Nobody wants Bobby

dumbcat · Post by **dumbcat** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 1:43 am

I hate to think of what a 0 - 0 tie means on a neutral field

tampa_griz · Post by **tampa_griz** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:04 am

crazycat wrote:He had a sprained MCL in the first round game and was cleared to play against UM less than three weeks later. He was noticeably limping throughout the game. You can't honestly tell me you watched that game closely and thought he was 100%.

You obviously didn't watch the game. You were too busy watching an injured Eddie Lee Ivory.

tampa_griz · Post by **tampa_griz** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 8:32 am

Grizlaw wrote:I have to admit, I sort of admire the way ol' crazycat always comes out with guns blazin', no matter what is going on in the thread. I mean -- here's a guy who has just been called out both for getting a guy's name wrong, and for having erroneously claimed that he didn't play against the Griz. Is he letting any of that put him on the defensive? Hell nah -- no matter how wrong he may have been, he can still see clear to criticize others for their "lake" of Griz knowledge.

Do you like Greek mythology? cc kind of reminds me of Sisyphus.

From Wikipedia wrote:Today, Sisyphean can be used as an adjective meaning that an activity is unending and/or repetitive. It could also be used to refer to tasks that are pointless and unrewarding.

Roll that rock cc!

crazycat · Post by **crazycat** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:12 am

tampa_griz wrote:
crazycat wrote:He had a sprained MCL in the first round game and was cleared to play against UM less than three weeks later. He was noticeably limping throughout the game. You can't honestly tell me you watched that game closely and thought he was 100%.
You obviously didn't watch the game. You were too busy watching an injured Eddie Lee Ivory.

Alright, alright.

If calling Louis Ivory, Eddie Lee Ivory, is all that bad then my kids, and all my brothers and sisters must really despise me. I get their names mixed up all the time, too. C'mon that wasn't that bad.

tampa_griz · Post by **tampa_griz** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:16 am

crazycat wrote:If calling Louis Ivory, Eddie Lee Ivory, is all that bad then my kids, and all my brothers and sisters must really despise me. I get their names mixed up all the time, too. C'mon that wasn't that bad.

Don't leave out your "their star RB was out" desperation cry.

crazycat · Post by **crazycat** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:26 am

tampa_griz wrote:
Grizlaw wrote:I have to admit, I sort of admire the way ol' crazycat always comes out with guns blazin', no matter what is going on in the thread. I mean -- here's a guy who has just been called out both for getting a guy's name wrong, and for having erroneously claimed that he didn't play against the Griz. Is he letting any of that put him on the defensive? Hell nah -- no matter how wrong he may have been, he can still see clear to criticize others for their "lake" of Griz knowledge.
Do you like Greek mythology? cc kind of reminds me of Sisyphus.

From Wikipedia wrote:Today, Sisyphean can be used as an adjective meaning that an activity is unending and/or repetitive. It could also be used to refer to tasks that are pointless and unrewarding.
Roll that rock cc!

That's almost a good comparison. The only difference is that me rolling that rock bothers you guys more than it does me. Which makes it a very fun rock to roll. So it has a point and is very rewarding. The angles you come up with to defend UM are hilarious. It's fun watching you squirm about Hauck and your playoff record. I just tell like it is -- give or take a few wrong first names and the occassional missed fact (injured, not out) -- and sit back and watch you try to spin it around.

For The Record: I think UM would've beat Furman even if "Louis" Ivory really was 100%. But since he was "nursing a sprained MCL" it's fun to roll that rock up the hill.

tampa_griz · Post by **tampa_griz** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:33 am

crazycat wrote:That's almost a good comparison. The only difference is that me rolling that rock bothers you guys more than it does me.

Wrong. When you squeal you squeal for a pretty good spell.

crazycat · Post by **crazycat** » Fri Jan 11, 2008 9:44 am

tampa_griz wrote:
crazycat wrote:That's almost a good comparison. The only difference is that me rolling that rock bothers you guys more than it does me.
Wrong. When you squeal you squeal for a pretty good spell.

Oh maybe once every great while.

futurebobcat · Post by **futurebobcat** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 10:00 am

UMclassof2002 wrote:
Bobcatsinmso wrote:Bobcat fans rejoice! We all know Bobby can't win the big games

scoreboardsayswhat?

oh, if you cant read. (UM grad..) it says 23-22 in Woffords favor... lol!

AlphaGriz1 · Post by **AlphaGriz1** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 12:59 pm

Still don't want him or the OC.

UMclassof2002 · Post by **UMclassof2002** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:52 pm

futurebobcat wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
Bobcatsinmso wrote:Bobcat fans rejoice! We all know Bobby can't win the big games

scoreboardsayswhat?
oh, if you cant read. (UM grad..) it says 23-22 in Woffords favor... lol!

He still owns your sorry ass, you plunger-humping chode sniffer.

Sucks to be M. S. You.

cats2506 · Post by **cats2506** » Mon Jan 21, 2008 5:11 pm

UMclassof2002 wrote:
futurebobcat wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
Bobcatsinmso wrote:Bobcat fans rejoice! We all know Bobby can't win the big games

scoreboardsayswhat?
oh, if you cant read. (UM grad..) it says 23-22 in Woffords favor... lol!

He still owns your sorry ass, you plunger-humping chode sniffer.

Sucks to be M. S. You.

Last I checked Bobby was 3-2 against MSU. That isnt a bad record, but it is worse than he has fared against most other FCS opponents, and it is hardly what I would consider "owned"

futurebobcat · Post by **futurebobcat** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:47 am

Its okay... The UM grad can't count LOL.

cats2506 · Post by **cats2506** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 11:44 am

futurebobcat wrote:Its okay... The UM grad can't count LOL.

Once again showing that there isnt any math requirment over there.

tampa_griz · Post by **tampa_griz** » Tue Jan 22, 2008 1:07 pm

cats2506 wrote:Once again showing that there isnt any math requirment over there.

Once again showing that there isn't much of a spelling or reading comprehension requirement over there. Further, what mathematical rule did UMClass break in his post? Having taken more math than most people should ever be subjected to, I'm very curious. Please explain. Here's a chance to show off that wonderful MSU math education.

futurebobcat · Post by **futurebobcat** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:15 am

tampa_griz wrote:
cats2506 wrote:Once again showing that there isnt any math requirment over there.
Once again showing that there isn't much of a spelling or reading comprehension requirement over there. Further, what mathematical rule did UMClass break in his post? Having taken more math than most people should ever be subjected to, I'm very curious. Please explain. Here's a chance to show off that wonderful MSU math education.

....your right our professions are less important, we just design the bridges that you UM grads walk across barefoot, or setup your save the tree's or hemp booths... lol

Sportin' Life · Post by **Sportin' Life** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:27 am

futurebobcat wrote:
tampa_griz wrote:
cats2506 wrote:Once again showing that there isnt any math requirment over there.
Once again showing that there isn't much of a spelling or reading comprehension requirement over there. Further, what mathematical rule did UMClass break in his post? Having taken more math than most people should ever be subjected to, I'm very curious. Please explain. Here's a chance to show off that wonderful MSU math education.
....your right our professions are less important, we just design the bridges that you UM grads walk across barefoot, or setup your save the tree's or hemp booths... lol

By that reply, I am guessing you haven't put much thought into tampa's 'lack of reading comprehension' assertion.

lol, indeed.

tampa_griz · Post by **tampa_griz** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:43 am

futurebobcat wrote:
tampa_griz wrote:Once again showing that there isn't much of a spelling or reading comprehension requirement over there. Further, what mathematical rule did UMClass break in his post? Having taken more math than most people should ever be subjected to, I'm very curious. Please explain. Here's a chance to show off that wonderful MSU math education.
....your right our professions are less important, we just design the bridges that you UM grads walk across barefoot, or setup your save the tree's or hemp booths... lol

K

cats2506 · Post by **cats2506** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:22 pm

Sportin' Life wrote:
futurebobcat wrote:
tampa_griz wrote:
cats2506 wrote:Once again showing that there isnt any math requirment over there.
Once again showing that there isn't much of a spelling or reading comprehension requirement over there. Further, what mathematical rule did UMClass break in his post? Having taken more math than most people should ever be subjected to, I'm very curious. Please explain. Here's a chance to show off that wonderful MSU math education.
....your right our professions are less important, we just design the bridges that you UM grads walk across barefoot, or setup your save the tree's or hemp booths... lol
By that reply, I am guessing you haven't put much thought into tampa's 'lack of reading comprehension' assertion.

lol, indeed.

futurebobcat wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
Bobcatsinmso wrote:Bobcat fans rejoice! We all know Bobby can't win the big games
scoreboardsayswhat?
oh, if you cant read. (UM grad..) it says 23-22 in Woffords favor... lol!

So UM grad thinks bobby is doing pretty good in the "Big Games", well in the playoffs, what I consider the "Big games" he is 5-5 or .500, overall he is .800 in his time at UM. Also note that 9 of the 10 game were at home and 3 of those wins came in his second year when he still had a Joe Glen recruited team. I would say that UM…02 didn’t look at the numbers very well if he disagrees with the statement that "bobby can’t win the big games"

UMclassof2002 wrote:He still owns your sorry ass,

Another statement where he didn’t look at the numbers, Bobby is 3-2 against MSU, or .600, overall he is .800 so he is doing far worse against MSU than he is against the rest of your cupcake schedule's that he likes so much. UM…02 doesn’t back his statements with any numbers or facts, thus he must have problems with basic statistics.

And yes I am a poor speller; but I can live with it since fundamental math is not a problem for me.

I have to wonder if UM…02 can even pass the Micky D test to be able to make change correctly.

cats2506 · Post by **cats2506** » Wed Jan 23, 2008 12:24 pm

futurebobcat wrote:
tampa_griz wrote:
cats2506 wrote:Once again showing that there isnt any math requirment over there.
Once again showing that there isn't much of a spelling or reading comprehension requirement over there. Further, what mathematical rule did UMClass break in his post? Having taken more math than most people should ever be subjected to, I'm very curious. Please explain. Here's a chance to show off that wonderful MSU math education.
....your right our professions are less important, we just design the bridges that you UM grads walk across barefoot, or setup your save the tree's or hemp booths... lol

Off topic but I was reminded of this

The Bridge Builder
An old man, going a lone highway,
Came, at the evening, cold and gray,
To a chasm, vast, and deep, and wide,
Through which was flowing a sullen tide.

The old man crossed in the twilight dim;
The sullen stream had no fears for him;
But he turned, when safe on the other side,
And built a bridge to span the tide.

"Old man," said a fellow pilgrim, near,
"You are wasting strength with building here;
Your journey will end with the ending day;
You never again must pass this way;
You have crossed the chasm, deep and wide-
Why build you a bridge at the eventide?"

The builder lifted his old gray head:
"Good friend, in the path I have come," he said,
"There followeth after me today,
A youth, whose feet must pass this way.

This chasm, that has been naught to me,
To that fair-haired youth may a pitfall be.
He, too, must cross in the twilight dim;
Good friend, I am building the bridge for him."

Nobody wants Bobby

Re: Nobody wants Bobby

Re: Nobody wants Bobby

Re: Nobody wants Bobby