Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

The place to talk smack with those not fortunate enough to be Bobcat fans.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Eastcoastgriz
Member # Retired
Posts: 2151
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Use to be New Jersey

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by Eastcoastgriz » Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:59 pm

STREETCAT wrote:Actually you get no rings Weber beat you head to head, they still win the big sky out right. Good effort though I would expect you to know how that works though,
I think that is incorrect. Both teams are entitled to rings.


The GRIZ, a quarter century of total football dominance over the cats.

User avatar
AlphaGriz1
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 10209
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:13 pm
Location: Dominating BN since 1997............

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by AlphaGriz1 » Sat Nov 22, 2008 11:04 pm

Why not give rings to everyone in the BSC so nobody feels left out?

Weber St is the BSC champ.

They beat us, end of story.



Stop with the co-champ stuff you look like a bunch of co-chumps.


A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
www.maroonblood.com
www.championshipsubdivision.com

CFGriz
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:56 pm

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by CFGriz » Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:16 am

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Why not give rings to everyone in the BSC so nobody feels left out?

Weber St is the BSC champ.

They beat us, end of story.



Stop with the co-champ stuff you look like a bunch of co-chumps.
So what do you say, just bow out now then?

You kind of sound like a Cat fan- I mean, with all due respect, since you are the self-proclaimed Alpha of all the Griz fans. :shrug:


cats2506: spawning BN trolls everyday.

User avatar
DriftCat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1568
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Kalispell, MT

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by DriftCat » Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:40 am

Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.

I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.


F.K.A. - MM7CAT

PDXGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by PDXGriz » Sun Nov 23, 2008 3:41 am

MM7CAT wrote:
Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.

I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.

All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!

ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!



User avatar
DriftCat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1568
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Kalispell, MT

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by DriftCat » Sun Nov 23, 2008 10:36 am

PDXGriz wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:
Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.

I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.

All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!

ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!
Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.


F.K.A. - MM7CAT

PDXGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by PDXGriz » Sun Nov 23, 2008 7:08 pm

MM7CAT wrote:
PDXGriz wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:
Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.

I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.

All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!

ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!
Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.
I don't know what cirriculum is :lol: =D^ #-o

You people should quite while you're ahead. Ahem....Scoreboard. Again.



User avatar
Hell's Bells
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4700
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:58 pm
Location: Belgrade, Mt.
Contact:

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by Hell's Bells » Sun Nov 23, 2008 9:58 pm

Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Feel free to take down the '02 and '03 Big Sky championship flags :D


This space for rent....

GrizinWashington
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7992
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by GrizinWashington » Mon Nov 24, 2008 1:00 am

Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions either cannot read, or is blinded by blue and gold. The Big Sky Conference has always rewarded all teams that ties for the top conference spot with a championship. You can argue all you want with that position if you wish. But please do it with the BSC Commissioner, not with Griz fans who rightly call their team "Big Sky Champions". Because they are.


We're all here 'cause we ain't all there.

User avatar
DriftCat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1568
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
Location: Kalispell, MT

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by DriftCat » Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:15 am

PDXGriz wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:
PDXGriz wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:
Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.

I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.

All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!

ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!
Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.
I don't know what cirriculum is :lol: =D^ #-o

You people should quite while you're ahead. Ahem....Scoreboard. Again.
How do you know when the other person has absolutely no comeback.......spelling smack! #-o


F.K.A. - MM7CAT

Grizlaw
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Floral Park, NY

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by Grizlaw » Mon Nov 24, 2008 9:44 am

MM7CAT wrote:
Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.

I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
Actually, if my memory serves me correctly -- I think if you look back at a lot of the recent years that Cats won co-championships, you'll find that in most (or maybe all) of those years, there were three teams tied for the championships, so there truly was no clear-cut winner between the three (because it was always a scenario where Team A beat Team B, Team B beat Team C, and Team C beat Team A). In those cases, I think awarding co-championships makes perfect sense, because any method you use to choose between the three is completely arbitrary anyway.

In cases like this year -- I agree that it would be logical to award Weber the championship; however, the rules are what they are, and thus, the Griz are technically co-champions. I honestly don't care, because at this point, the only thing I really get excited about are national titles, so I'm more focused on the playoff picture. However, to all the Cat fans who are making a big deal about the "co-champions" thing -- I think if you're honest with yourselves, you'll have to admit that if the Cats were in this position, you'd be celebrating your "co-championship" just the same.


I work as an attorney so that I can afford good scotch, which helps me to forget that I work as an attorney.

PDXGriz
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 251
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by PDXGriz » Mon Nov 24, 2008 10:55 am

MM7CAT wrote:
PDXGriz wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:
PDXGriz wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:
Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.

I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.

All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!

ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!
Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.
I don't know what cirriculum is :lol: =D^ #-o

You people should quite while you're ahead. Ahem....Scoreboard. Again.
How do you know when the other person has absolutely no comeback.......spelling smack! #-o

Actually what happened was you attempted some sort of academic smack since your athletic program is routinely inferior, and you even fell flat on your face doing that.

You people are just lovable.



User avatar
STREETCAT
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1021
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:11 am
Location: BOZEMAN

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by STREETCAT » Tue Nov 25, 2008 11:47 am

GrizinWashington wrote:Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions either cannot read, or is blinded by blue and gold. The Big Sky Conference has always rewarded all teams that ties for the top conference spot with a championship. You can argue all you want with that position if you wish. But please do it with the BSC Commissioner, not with Griz fans who rightly call their team "Big Sky Champions". Because they are.
You are correct

From BSC website

"Both Weber State and Montana finished 7-1 in conference play, and will be recognized as co-champions. Weber State, however, gained the Big Sky's automatic bid to the Division I Football Championship playoffs becuase of its 45-28 win over the Grizzlies. Montana is expected to receive one of the eight at-large bids to the playoffs."

But your not Champions, but co-champions. See the difference!


I don't know what your problem is, but I'll bet it's hard to pronounce.

I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.

Image

User avatar
tampa_griz
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 5467
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by tampa_griz » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:13 pm

STREETCAT wrote:But your not Champions, but co-champions. See the difference!
That's exactly what he said:
GrizinWashington wrote:Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions.....



User avatar
STREETCAT
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1021
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:11 am
Location: BOZEMAN

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by STREETCAT » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:16 pm

tampa_griz wrote:
STREETCAT wrote:But your not Champions, but co-champions. See the difference!
That's exactly what he said:
GrizinWashington wrote:Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions.....
No He says

"But please do it with the BSC Commissioner, not with Griz fans who rightly call their team "Big Sky Champions". Because they are"

Which they are not. Big Sky Champions would imply that they won the big sky out right, which they did not do.


I don't know what your problem is, but I'll bet it's hard to pronounce.

I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.

Image

GrizinWashington
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7992
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by GrizinWashington » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:17 pm

STREETCAT wrote:
tampa_griz wrote:
STREETCAT wrote:But your not Champions, but co-champions. See the difference!
That's exactly what he said:
GrizinWashington wrote:Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions.....
No He says

"But please do it with the BSC Commissioner, not with Griz fans who rightly call their team "Big Sky Champions". Because they are"

Which they are not. Big Sky Champions would imply that they won the big sky out right, which they did not do.

OMFG.


We're all here 'cause we ain't all there.

User avatar
BigBruceBaker
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3971
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:24 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by BigBruceBaker » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:22 pm

PDXGriz wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:
PDXGriz wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:
Yossarian wrote:
RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!

Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.

I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.

All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!

ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!
Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.
I don't know what cirriculum is :lol: =D^ #-o

You people should quite while you're ahead. Ahem....Scoreboard. Again.
Good one


I love the Bobcats and the Miami Hurricanes an unhealthy level

CapitalCityCat
Member # Retired
Posts: 2410
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:52 pm

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by CapitalCityCat » Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:58 pm

GrizinWashington wrote:OMFG.
One Mother F'n Griz?


Retiring my moniker. It's time to ride off into the sunset. It's been a fun ride. Go Cats.

BR GRIZ
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:29 pm

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by BR GRIZ » Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:08 pm

I'm curious: Did the Cats tie for 3rd in the conference this year or did they take 4th? :wink:



User avatar
STREETCAT
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1021
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:11 am
Location: BOZEMAN

Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!

Post by STREETCAT » Tue Nov 25, 2008 1:19 pm

BR GRIZ wrote:I'm curious: Did the Cats tie for 3rd in the conference this year or did they take 4th? :wink:
Co third place right! Or wait co second place if both um and Weber are 1st Right? :lol: #-o


I don't know what your problem is, but I'll bet it's hard to pronounce.

I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.

Image

Post Reply