I think that is incorrect. Both teams are entitled to rings.STREETCAT wrote:Actually you get no rings Weber beat you head to head, they still win the big sky out right. Good effort though I would expect you to know how that works though,
Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
-
Eastcoastgriz
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2151
- Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 5:43 am
- Location: Use to be New Jersey
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
The GRIZ, a quarter century of total football dominance over the cats.
- AlphaGriz1
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 10209
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 4:13 pm
- Location: Dominating BN since 1997............
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Why not give rings to everyone in the BSC so nobody feels left out?
Weber St is the BSC champ.
They beat us, end of story.
Stop with the co-champ stuff you look like a bunch of co-chumps.
Weber St is the BSC champ.
They beat us, end of story.
Stop with the co-champ stuff you look like a bunch of co-chumps.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
www.maroonblood.com
www.championshipsubdivision.com
www.maroonblood.com
www.championshipsubdivision.com
-
CFGriz
- BobcatNation Redshirt
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:56 pm
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
So what do you say, just bow out now then?AlphaGriz1 wrote:Why not give rings to everyone in the BSC so nobody feels left out?
Weber St is the BSC champ.
They beat us, end of story.
Stop with the co-champ stuff you look like a bunch of co-chumps.
You kind of sound like a Cat fan- I mean, with all due respect, since you are the self-proclaimed Alpha of all the Griz fans.
cats2506: spawning BN trolls everyday.
- DriftCat
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
- Location: Kalispell, MT
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.Yossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
F.K.A. - MM7CAT
-
PDXGriz
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:10 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
MM7CAT wrote:Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.Yossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!
ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!
- DriftCat
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
- Location: Kalispell, MT
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.PDXGriz wrote:MM7CAT wrote:Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.Yossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!
ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!
F.K.A. - MM7CAT
-
PDXGriz
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:10 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
I don't know what cirriculum isMM7CAT wrote:Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.PDXGriz wrote:MM7CAT wrote:Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.Yossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!
ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!
You people should quite while you're ahead. Ahem....Scoreboard. Again.
- Hell's Bells
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4700
- Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:58 pm
- Location: Belgrade, Mt.
- Contact:
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Feel free to take down the '02 and '03 Big Sky championship flagsYossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
This space for rent....
-
GrizinWashington
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7992
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions either cannot read, or is blinded by blue and gold. The Big Sky Conference has always rewarded all teams that ties for the top conference spot with a championship. You can argue all you want with that position if you wish. But please do it with the BSC Commissioner, not with Griz fans who rightly call their team "Big Sky Champions". Because they are.
We're all here 'cause we ain't all there.
- DriftCat
- 1st Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1568
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 8:39 pm
- Location: Kalispell, MT
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
How do you know when the other person has absolutely no comeback.......spelling smack!PDXGriz wrote:I don't know what cirriculum isMM7CAT wrote:Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.PDXGriz wrote:MM7CAT wrote:Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.Yossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!
ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!![]()
![]()
You people should quite while you're ahead. Ahem....Scoreboard. Again.
F.K.A. - MM7CAT
-
Grizlaw
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3305
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:04 pm
- Location: Floral Park, NY
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Actually, if my memory serves me correctly -- I think if you look back at a lot of the recent years that Cats won co-championships, you'll find that in most (or maybe all) of those years, there were three teams tied for the championships, so there truly was no clear-cut winner between the three (because it was always a scenario where Team A beat Team B, Team B beat Team C, and Team C beat Team A). In those cases, I think awarding co-championships makes perfect sense, because any method you use to choose between the three is completely arbitrary anyway.MM7CAT wrote:Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.Yossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
In cases like this year -- I agree that it would be logical to award Weber the championship; however, the rules are what they are, and thus, the Griz are technically co-champions. I honestly don't care, because at this point, the only thing I really get excited about are national titles, so I'm more focused on the playoff picture. However, to all the Cat fans who are making a big deal about the "co-champions" thing -- I think if you're honest with yourselves, you'll have to admit that if the Cats were in this position, you'd be celebrating your "co-championship" just the same.
I work as an attorney so that I can afford good scotch, which helps me to forget that I work as an attorney.
-
PDXGriz
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 251
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:10 pm
- Location: Portland, OR
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
MM7CAT wrote:How do you know when the other person has absolutely no comeback.......spelling smack!PDXGriz wrote:I don't know what cirriculum isMM7CAT wrote:Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.PDXGriz wrote:MM7CAT wrote:Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.Yossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!
ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!![]()
![]()
You people should quite while you're ahead. Ahem....Scoreboard. Again.
Actually what happened was you attempted some sort of academic smack since your athletic program is routinely inferior, and you even fell flat on your face doing that.
You people are just lovable.
- STREETCAT
- 2nd Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:11 am
- Location: BOZEMAN
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
You are correctGrizinWashington wrote:Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions either cannot read, or is blinded by blue and gold. The Big Sky Conference has always rewarded all teams that ties for the top conference spot with a championship. You can argue all you want with that position if you wish. But please do it with the BSC Commissioner, not with Griz fans who rightly call their team "Big Sky Champions". Because they are.
From BSC website
"Both Weber State and Montana finished 7-1 in conference play, and will be recognized as co-champions. Weber State, however, gained the Big Sky's automatic bid to the Division I Football Championship playoffs becuase of its 45-28 win over the Grizzlies. Montana is expected to receive one of the eight at-large bids to the playoffs."
But your not Champions, but co-champions. See the difference!
I don't know what your problem is, but I'll bet it's hard to pronounce.
I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.

I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.

- tampa_griz
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:37 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
That's exactly what he said:STREETCAT wrote:But your not Champions, but co-champions. See the difference!
GrizinWashington wrote:Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions.....
- STREETCAT
- 2nd Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:11 am
- Location: BOZEMAN
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
No He saystampa_griz wrote:That's exactly what he said:STREETCAT wrote:But your not Champions, but co-champions. See the difference!
GrizinWashington wrote:Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions.....
"But please do it with the BSC Commissioner, not with Griz fans who rightly call their team "Big Sky Champions". Because they are"
Which they are not. Big Sky Champions would imply that they won the big sky out right, which they did not do.
I don't know what your problem is, but I'll bet it's hard to pronounce.
I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.

I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.

-
GrizinWashington
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7992
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
STREETCAT wrote:No He saystampa_griz wrote:That's exactly what he said:STREETCAT wrote:But your not Champions, but co-champions. See the difference!
GrizinWashington wrote:Anyone who does not agree that Montana and Weber are co-champions.....
"But please do it with the BSC Commissioner, not with Griz fans who rightly call their team "Big Sky Champions". Because they are"
Which they are not. Big Sky Champions would imply that they won the big sky out right, which they did not do.
OMFG.
We're all here 'cause we ain't all there.
- BigBruceBaker
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 1:24 pm
- Location: God's Country
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Good onePDXGriz wrote:I don't know what cirriculum isMM7CAT wrote:Actually, I get up everyday and thank God that I am not a jizz. And I said nothing about 1984......maybe UM needs to expand the cirriculum to include reading as well as general comprehension.PDXGriz wrote:MM7CAT wrote:Actually No! I am not sure why you griziditots can't wrap your heads around how this works. Those "co-champs" that you say WE claim are actually co-champs that the griz claim......you see those years it was the EXACT same situation as this year! The Cats and the griz had the same conference record (much like Weber and the griz this year) so that means there is a tie, yes. WHAT DO YOU DO WHEN THERE IS A TIE? YOU GO TO A TIE-BREAKER WHICH US (OR WEBER THIS YEAR) BEATING YOU BREAKS THE FRICKIN TIE! THEREFORE, NO CO-CHAMPS. THAT IS WHY WE HANG BANNERS FOR THOSE YEARS. WE WERE THE BIG SKY CHAMPS, NOT THE GRIZ.Yossarian wrote:RMD wrote:frizz fans will always be A-holes!!!! you are not champs, WEBER IS!!!!! and that is all I got to say about that!!!
Careful RMD, with that logic your taking away a couple Bobcat co-champ flags.
I dont expect you morons to get this because it has been beat into the ground and it still hasnt sunk in........UM may want to add some courses in 5th grade comprehension.
All I hear is WAAAAAHHH!!! WAHHHH!! I WISH IT WAS 1984!
ENJOY YOUR GRIZ ENVY LOSERS!!!![]()
![]()
You people should quite while you're ahead. Ahem....Scoreboard. Again.
I love the Bobcats and the Miami Hurricanes an unhealthy level
-
CapitalCityCat
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2410
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 11:52 pm
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
One Mother F'n Griz?GrizinWashington wrote:OMFG.
Retiring my moniker. It's time to ride off into the sunset. It's been a fun ride. Go Cats.
-
BR GRIZ
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2005 6:29 pm
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
I'm curious: Did the Cats tie for 3rd in the conference this year or did they take 4th? 
- STREETCAT
- 2nd Team All-BobcatNation
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 8:11 am
- Location: BOZEMAN
Re: Big Sky Co-Champs!!!
Co third place right! Or wait co second place if both um and Weber are 1st Right?BR GRIZ wrote:I'm curious: Did the Cats tie for 3rd in the conference this year or did they take 4th?
I don't know what your problem is, but I'll bet it's hard to pronounce.
I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.

I have plenty of talent and vision. I just don't give a damn.
