Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
Hey Cat-trash, I actually LIKE losing to Bozo once in a while. Frankly, it had become tedious to even have to play you guys.whitetrashgriz wrote:when you stop losing to us
I know this has been said before and it is very difficult for griz fans to understand but I will try one more time for you MaZoo. The griz were 8-3 and the end of the season, the Cats were 7-4. The griz had a non-conference game against a DII while the Cats played all I-A. If the cats had played a DII instead of a DI we would have had identical records and throw in the fact that we dominated the griz, we would have been in the playoffs. Seeing these facts and the fact that the griz got smoked AT HOME in the playoffs, how do you figure that your season last year was so much more successful than ours? Just because you made it to the playoffs? You don't really beleive that do you? The tiebreaker for the conference title went EWU, MSU, then UM but since UM had a better record and a bigger checkbook they were in and we were out but I guarantee you this, it was not because they were the better team. I feel better now.MaZooLaGriz wrote:Hey Cat-trash, I actually LIKE losing to Bozo once in a while. Frankly, it had become tedious to even have to play you guys.whitetrashgriz wrote:when you stop losing to us
But while the Griz/Sc@ game is big fun, it's not the measure of a football team. That happens by virture of - and I know this is not a word familiar to you - PLAYOFFS!
Tell me, please... if this is another typical Sc@ season, does it spell the end of 50% Kramer?
Yes... over and over and over. "If", "had we", "since", "checkbook", bla, bla, bla. Excuses, excuses, excuses.MM7CAT wrote:I know this has been said before
I agree 100%MM7CAT wrote:I know this has been said before and it is very difficult for griz fans to understand but I will try one more time for you MaZoo. The griz were 8-3 and the end of the season, the Cats were 7-4. The griz had a non-conference game against a DII while the Cats played all I-A. If the cats had played a DII instead of a DI we would have had identical records and throw in the fact that we dominated the griz, we would have been in the playoffs. Seeing these facts and the fact that the griz got smoked AT HOME in the playoffs, how do you figure that your season last year was so much more successful than ours? Just because you made it to the playoffs? You don't really beleive that do you? The tiebreaker for the conference title went EWU, MSU, then UM but since UM had a better record and a bigger checkbook they were in and we were out but I guarantee you this, it was not because they were the better team. I feel better now.MaZooLaGriz wrote:Hey Cat-trash, I actually LIKE losing to Bozo once in a while. Frankly, it had become tedious to even have to play you guys.whitetrashgriz wrote:when you stop losing to us
But while the Griz/Sc@ game is big fun, it's not the measure of a football team. That happens by virture of - and I know this is not a word familiar to you - PLAYOFFS!
Tell me, please... if this is another typical Sc@ season, does it spell the end of 50% Kramer?
Cue pictures of kitties.
I knew I could count on ya BB!MM7CAT wrote:MaZooLaGriz wrote:Hey Cat-trash, I actually LIKE losing to Bozo once in a while. Frankly, it had become tedious to even have to play you guys.whitetrashgriz wrote:when you stop losing to us
But while the Griz/Sc@ game is big fun, it's not the measure of a football team. That happens by virture of - and I know this is not a word familiar to you - PLAYOFFS!
Tell me, please... if this is another typical Sc@ season, does it spell the end of 50% Kramer?
Cue pictures of kitties.
Haven't seen that picture before on here. Wait, I have.bearBAC wrote:This weeks award goes to G.W. the super WHINER!G.W.Bush wrote:This coming from a fan whose supporting base blames the turf and outdoor conditions for every Griz loss. Wow...MaZooLaGriz wrote: Yes... over and over and over. "If", "had we", "since", "checkbook", bla, bla, bla. Excuses, excuses, excuses.
Yeah, you guys sure showed Cal Poly how its done...PS we played them on the roadBR GRIZ wrote:[quote="MM7CAT
. . .The griz had a non-conference game against a DII while the Cats played all I-A. If the cats had played a DII instead of a DI we would have had identical records . . .
That quote makes for a good sound bite but it doesn't s stand up. The Cats would not have travelled to a DII school. The only way you could have played a DII instead of a DI and ended up with an identical record is to have scheduled more home games. Face it, the Griz went to the playoffs because they went 3-2 on the road against DI competition, and the Cats failed to make them because they went 1-4 on the road against DI competition.
Cue: our road games were more difficult than your road games
i thought teams were measured in championships. no? last time i checked, neither the cats or the griz won it all last year, so as far as myself and the rest of the world are concerned, we were equal. there is one national champ, and everyone else is tied at no-national-champ. by your logic you may be better than some very good teams because they may have lost earlier in the day than the griz! get a grip.MaZooLaGriz wrote:Hey Cat-trash, I actually LIKE losing to Bozo once in a while. Frankly, it had become tedious to even have to play you guys.whitetrashgriz wrote:when you stop losing to us
But while the Griz/Sc@ game is big fun, it's not the measure of a football team. That happens by virture of - and I know this is not a word familiar to you - PLAYOFFS!
Tell me, please... if this is another typical Sc@ season, does it spell the end of 50% Kramer?
Yeah, and we showed Portland State how its done...PS you played, and lost, to them on the road as well. But that's my point, you couldn't win on the road. Perhaps you would have beaten Cal Poly and PSU at home, but you also may not have been able to pull out your come from behind victories over ISU, NDSU and NAU on the road.catamaran wrote:Yeah, you guys sure showed Cal Poly how its done...PS we played them on the roadBR GRIZ wrote:[quote="MM7CAT
. . .The griz had a non-conference game against a DII while the Cats played all I-A. If the cats had played a DII instead of a DI we would have had identical records . . .
That quote makes for a good sound bite but it doesn't s stand up. The Cats would not have travelled to a DII school. The only way you could have played a DII instead of a DI and ended up with an identical record is to have scheduled more home games. Face it, the Griz went to the playoffs because they went 3-2 on the road against DI competition, and the Cats failed to make them because they went 1-4 on the road against DI competition.
Cue: our road games were more difficult than your road games
im sorry...did you win it all last year?bearBAC wrote:at the end of the regular season, 16 teams play for the championship!
The rest (like the kittens) watch , pout, and say woulda, coulda & shoulda - blame the selection committee for not picking a team with a 7-4 record over one with an 8-3 - Sour grapes? yes,Kitten style
With all do respect, THE L to Portland State is what did you in. Along with getting drilled by Cal Poly.MM7CAT wrote:I know this has been said before and it is very difficult for griz fans to understand but I will try one more time for you MaZoo. The griz were 8-3 and the end of the season, the Cats were 7-4. The griz had a non-conference game against a DII while the Cats played all I-A. If the cats had played a DII instead of a DI we would have had identical records and throw in the fact that we dominated the griz, we would have been in the playoffs. Seeing these facts and the fact that the griz got smoked AT HOME in the playoffs, how do you figure that your season last year was so much more successful than ours? Just because you made it to the playoffs? You don't really beleive that do you? The tiebreaker for the conference title went EWU, MSU, then UM but since UM had a better record and a bigger checkbook they were in and we were out but I guarantee you this, it was not because they were the better team. I feel better now.MaZooLaGriz wrote:Hey Cat-trash, I actually LIKE losing to Bozo once in a while. Frankly, it had become tedious to even have to play you guys.whitetrashgriz wrote:when you stop losing to us
But while the Griz/Sc@ game is big fun, it's not the measure of a football team. That happens by virture of - and I know this is not a word familiar to you - PLAYOFFS!
Tell me, please... if this is another typical Sc@ season, does it spell the end of 50% Kramer?
Cue pictures of kitties.
CelticCat wrote:Well it's because the Griz are the only program in Montana of course.
No, dear.whitetrashgriz wrote:i thought teams were measured in championships. no?
Superior School??????????? Now who is out of his element. You probably didn't even go to school (obviously) but if you had you would have learned about higher education unless you went to UM. Which McDonald's do you work for or are you a taxidermist?King wrote:griz trolls? give me a break. You're just jealous that the griz have a better record than the scats. Get over it. We have superior sports teams and we're a superior school.
