
.ftg.
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
Oh the irony of using a picture from that game. Try again, your other stuff is much better.Bozecat wrote:
.ftg.
But damn, that's a sweet pic!!!!Htowngriz wrote:Oh the irony of using a picture from that game. Try again, your other stuff is much better.Bozecat wrote:
.ftg.
I'm with you on the first part. The second, we'll see about that..Cat Grad wrote:Actually, the hits in that game were some of the best ever (until the zebras started throwing the hanky around the field). Even then, there were still some hits that I felt in the stands.
This year in Bozo, we win 8-0. Two field goals and one safety as Ash stresses all aspects of a team win. We kick the second field goal with a little over two minutes and turn it over to the defense--again--and they give it to our offense to kill the clock.
Absolute denial, is admitting the truth. Cheap excuses only weakens your position.Htowngriz wrote:Let's not forget about that blown fumble call that led to your only points.longhorn_22 wrote:
If that penalty had been called, the Cats would have had the ball at around midfield. With 2 minutes to go they had the ball at the 20 yard line and failed to score. They had plenty of chances to win and didn't execute. Bad calls go both ways.GOKATS wrote:Absolute denial, is admitting the truth. Cheap excuses only weakens your position.Htowngriz wrote:Let's not forget about that blown fumble call that led to your only points.longhorn_22 wrote:
Like you tell us when we bring up your mud hole of a field in '05? I've gotten over that, how are you doing with yours?CelticCat wrote:Are you saying that a blatant penalty, which was not called, and resulted in a TURNOVER (interception), had absolutely no impact on the game whatsoever? Instead of having the ball at midfeld from a penalty (hell, maybe Barnhart would've made the catch if he wasn't having his head ripped sideways), the Griz picked it off instead. Yea, no big deal. I'm sure the Griz would feel the same way if the situation were reversed, and then we could tell you to quit being babies you had plenty of chances.
Field conditions and penalties are two totally different things.Htowngriz wrote:Like you tell us when we bring up your mud hole of a field in '05? I've gotten over that, how are you doing with yours?CelticCat wrote:Are you saying that a blatant penalty, which was not called, and resulted in a TURNOVER (interception), had absolutely no impact on the game whatsoever? Instead of having the ball at midfeld from a penalty (hell, maybe Barnhart would've made the catch if he wasn't having his head ripped sideways), the Griz picked it off instead. Yea, no big deal. I'm sure the Griz would feel the same way if the situation were reversed, and then we could tell you to quit being babies you had plenty of chances.
Tim Donaghy would disagree with you.Htowngriz wrote:Like you tell us when we bring up your mud hole of a field in '05? I've gotten over that, how are you doing with yours?CelticCat wrote:Are you saying that a blatant penalty, which was not called, and resulted in a TURNOVER (interception), had absolutely no impact on the game whatsoever? Instead of having the ball at midfeld from a penalty (hell, maybe Barnhart would've made the catch if he wasn't having his head ripped sideways), the Griz picked it off instead. Yea, no big deal. I'm sure the Griz would feel the same way if the situation were reversed, and then we could tell you to quit being babies you had plenty of chances.
You have one year to brag/whine/complain/taunt. After the next Cat/shiz, the previous year is a thing of the past.Htowngriz wrote:Like you tell us when we bring up your mud hole of a field in '05? I've gotten over that, how are you doing with yours?CelticCat wrote:Are you saying that a blatant penalty, which was not called, and resulted in a TURNOVER (interception), had absolutely no impact on the game whatsoever? Instead of having the ball at midfeld from a penalty (hell, maybe Barnhart would've made the catch if he wasn't having his head ripped sideways), the Griz picked it off instead. Yea, no big deal. I'm sure the Griz would feel the same way if the situation were reversed, and then we could tell you to quit being babies you had plenty of chances.
Sometimes your firm grip on reality amazes me, AG. Even though you forgot to capitalize Cats...again.AlphaGriz1 wrote:The Griz fans that complain about field conditions have their head up their "bear" asses.
We didn't lose to JMU because of the field, they physically kicked our ass and punched us in the mouth.
We didn't lose to the cats because of a muddy field, you beat us on the same field.
They will come back with the usuall comebacks, "It negated our obvious team speed", running games are not affected by bad field conditions"
BULLSH*T
If your coaching staff can't make changes during a game like ours obviously cannot you deserve to lose.
Both teams play on the same surface it affects both teams the same way, good teams find a way to win in adverse conditions. It pains me to say but on both those occassions we were not the better team.
Like I really forgot.Cat in NC wrote:Sometimes your firm grip on reality amazes me, AG. Even though you forgot to capitalize Cats...again.AlphaGriz1 wrote:The Griz fans that complain about field conditions have their head up their "bear" asses.
We didn't lose to JMU because of the field, they physically kicked our ass and punched us in the mouth.
We didn't lose to the cats because of a muddy field, you beat us on the same field.
They will come back with the usuall comebacks, "It negated our obvious team speed", running games are not affected by bad field conditions"
BULLSH*T
If your coaching staff can't make changes during a game like ours obviously cannot you deserve to lose.
Both teams play on the same surface it affects both teams the same way, good teams find a way to win in adverse conditions. It pains me to say but on both those occassions we were not the better team.