Page 1 of 2

Powerhouse

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:43 pm
by poorgriz
I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?

Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:47 pm
by FTG06'
The answer is simple: money talks, bull**** walks. And UM definitely likes the money.

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:26 am
by Egg Salad
3. Why is this in Bobcat Athletics?

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:33 am
by MashTun
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
They are and have been pretty good. I doubt they'll beat us in Cat/griz though. It will be a low scoring defensive battle. My kind of game.

What I can't figure out is why this year IMHO, there seems to be a feeling in grizzlyville that they are, such and incredible team this year. I don't get it.

The only player of the griz I worry about is Lex. Berquist is better this year, but not a major threat. In general griz D is strongest part of that team, not the O.

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:58 am
by Nick
MashTun wrote:
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
They are and have been pretty good. I doubt they'll beat us in Cat/griz though. It will be a low scoring defensive battle. My kind of game.

What I can't figure out is why this year IMHO, there seems to be a feeling in grizzlyville that they are, such and incredible team this year. I don't get it.

The only player of the griz I worry about is Lex. Berquist is better this year, but not a major threat. In general griz D is strongest part of that team, not the O.
Like last year? :roll:

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:59 am
by Cat-theotherwhitemeat
poorgriz wrote:2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
You're preaching to the choir here my good man.

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:08 am
by Nick
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
Look who's footsteps those are also. Idaho.

I rest my case.

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:13 am
by poorgriz
Nick wrote:
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
Look who's footsteps those are also. Idaho.

I rest my case.
At least they took the chance and moved up when they claimed that they were such a great team in the Big Sky. You boys won't even take the chance to play a D-1A program, win or lose, it still showing that you have the balls to step up and compete with the "BIG BOYS".

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 9:14 am
by MashTun
Nick wrote:
MashTun wrote:
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
They are and have been pretty good. I doubt they'll beat us in Cat/griz though. It will be a low scoring defensive battle. My kind of game.

What I can't figure out is why this year IMHO, there seems to be a feeling in grizzlyville that they are, such and incredible team this year. I don't get it.

The only player of the griz I worry about is Lex. Berquist is better this year, but not a major threat. In general griz D is strongest part of that team, not the O.
Like last year? :roll:
Low scoring like last year, except that the Cats end up winning.

BTW Nick, you're reaching a bit if that's what you get from my post. Take the smack to the smack board :roll:

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 1:06 pm
by Nick
MashTun wrote:
Nick wrote:
MashTun wrote:
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
They are and have been pretty good. I doubt they'll beat us in Cat/griz though. It will be a low scoring defensive battle. My kind of game.

What I can't figure out is why this year IMHO, there seems to be a feeling in grizzlyville that they are, such and incredible team this year. I don't get it.

The only player of the griz I worry about is Lex. Berquist is better this year, but not a major threat. In general griz D is strongest part of that team, not the O.
Like last year? :roll:
Low scoring like last year, except that the Cats end up winning.

BTW Nick, you're reaching a bit if that's what you get from my post. Take the smack to the smack board :roll:
Oh boo hoo. I only said that because that's the GRIZ kind of game as of late. I don't see how that works in the Cats' advantage.

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 2:34 pm
by MashTun
Nick wrote:
MashTun wrote:
Nick wrote:
MashTun wrote:
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
They are and have been pretty good. I doubt they'll beat us in Cat/griz though. It will be a low scoring defensive battle. My kind of game.

What I can't figure out is why this year IMHO, there seems to be a feeling in grizzlyville that they are, such and incredible team this year. I don't get it.

The only player of the griz I worry about is Lex. Berquist is better this year, but not a major threat. In general griz D is strongest part of that team, not the O.
Like last year? :roll:
Low scoring like last year, except that the Cats end up winning.

BTW Nick, you're reaching a bit if that's what you get from my post. Take the smack to the smack board :roll:
Oh boo hoo. I only said that because that's the GRIZ kind of game as of late. I don't see how that works in the Cats' advantage.
Last year was basically a one big play game and it came out in UM's favor. I don't think that's a real 'advantage'. I'd expect the same this year, a big play, maybe two will decide it.

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:33 pm
by Eastcoastgriz
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?
Of course we beat Id-a-hoe all the time!!! :D

Re: Powerhouse

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:15 pm
by Nick
poorgriz wrote:
Nick wrote:
poorgriz wrote:I keep hearing all these griz fans talking about how much of a powerhouse in the Big Sky they are. I have two questions I would like to ask them.

1. Do you think you would be a powerhouse if Boise State and Idaho were still in the Big Sky?

2. If you are such an amazing team/program, than why are you still playing in the Big Sky and at the D-1AA level. Why not follow in the footsteps of Boise State, or are those shoes just to big to fill?
Look who's footsteps those are also. Idaho.

I rest my case.
At least they took the chance and moved up when they claimed that they were such a great team in the Big Sky. You boys won't even take the chance to play a D-1A program, win or lose, it still showing that you have the balls to step up and compete with the "BIG BOYS".
1991 - Oregon State
1992 - Washington State, Kansas State
1993 - Oregon
1995 - Washington State
1996 - Oregon State
1998 - Wyoming
1999 - Idaho
2000 - Idaho
2001 - Hawaii, Idaho
2002 - Idaho
2003 - Idaho
2005 - Oregon
2006 - Iowa
2008 - Hawaii (?)

Dear poorgriz,

Please bring it harder than that next time.

Hugs & kisses,

Nick

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 8:45 am
by cats2506
Does Idaho count as one of the 'Big Boys'?

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:28 am
by RMD
Will the Frizz even schedule Idaho anymore?

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:55 am
by AlphaGriz1
We barely keep our head above water in the BSC we would be worse than Idaho if we moved up. Boise will come back to the pack here in a year or two and then everyone can quit using that stupid arguement.

BSU will soon be screaming "WE ARE MARSHALL" and sucking on the football field the same way.

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:05 am
by Nick
RMD wrote:Will the Frizz even schedule Idaho anymore?
Idaho ended the series. They are 1-4 vs the Griz since the series was renewed in `99 but the two haven't met since UM spanked Idaho 41-28 in a game that wasn't even that close in Missoula in 03.

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:31 am
by Gus
Ok lets look since 1999 shall we...

1999 - Idaho Loss 33 to 30 (7-4)
2000 - Idaho Win 45-38 (5-6)
2001 – Hawaii Loss 30-12 (9-3), Idaho Win 33-27 (1-10)
2002 - Idaho Win 38-31 (2-10)
2003 - Idaho Win 41-28 (3-9)
2005 - Oregon Loss 47-14 (10-2)
2004 - ????
2006 - Iowa 41-7 (6-7)
2007 - ????
2008 We cant really count Hawaii can we?

Calling Idaho one of the Big Boys is a bit of a stetch dont you think...

"the two haven't met since UM spanked Idaho 41-28 in a game that wasn't even that close in Missoula in 03."

And spanking a 3 and 9 team by 13 points at home? Wow that was quite the beatdown...

I would think Idaho would like to resume the series. The Jizz appeared to be one of the only teams they could compete with.

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:54 pm
by Nick
Gus wrote:Ok lets look since 1999 shall we...

1999 - Idaho Loss 33 to 30 (7-4)
2000 - Idaho Win 45-38 (5-6)
2001 – Hawaii Loss 30-12 (9-3), Idaho Win 33-27 (1-10)
2002 - Idaho Win 38-31 (2-10)
2003 - Idaho Win 41-28 (3-9)
2005 - Oregon Loss 47-14 (10-2)
2004 - ????
2006 - Iowa 41-7 (6-7)
2007 - ????
2008 We cant really count Hawaii can we?

Calling Idaho one of the Big Boys is a bit of a stetch dont you think...

"the two haven't met since UM spanked Idaho 41-28 in a game that wasn't even that close in Missoula in 03."

And spanking a 3 and 9 team by 13 points at home? Wow that was quite the beatdown...

I would think Idaho would like to resume the series. The Jizz appeared to be one of the only teams they could compete with.

Yeah Idaho was 3-9 against I-A opponents. Opponents like Washington State, Boise State, and Washington. When you look at their conference opponents, all of them had a tougher time with the Vandals than Montana did.

Like it or not they ahve more scholarships than UM. In that same time span I think the Cats lost to UI something like 56-7:shock: . Poor record or not that's not a "cupcake" opponent. Show me where I called Idaho one of the big boys, and yes that game was a beatdown. The Griz were up 31-9 before putting the reserves in.

You guys are funny. You say UM never plays I-A teams. Then when I show you they do, you pick and choose which ones count. :lol:

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:12 pm
by cats2506
Nick wrote:Yeah Idaho was 3-9 against I-A opponents. Opponents like Washington State, Boise State, and Washington.
We know they are I-A and they play those teams but they got beat by those teams, they were 3-9 in 2003. The games they won? New Mexico St., Louisiana-Monroe & Utah St.

And who did they beat in 2002 when they were 2-10? San Diego St & Middle Tennessee St.