The Bobcat Nation

Found here

http://www.standard.net/live/opinion/cartoonarchive

Very Funny!!!! You have to click on the link for Unnecessary roughness

Dang Balogh looks good.

I think Blackwater should sue the newspaper for defamation of character.

It is sickening that they would be compared to a football player that cheap shots people.

Blackwater is a group of highly trained professionals that are being targeted in the media for doing their job and getting results.

Don't taint them by comparing a college football player to them.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:I think Blackwater should sue the newspaper for defamation of character.

It is sickening that they would be compared to a football player that cheap shots people.

Blackwater is a group of highly trained professionals that are being targeted in the media for doing their job and getting results.

Don't taint them by comparing a college football player to them.

Ya got that right. I remember when Markos "I got 5 Medals of Honor, 12 Purple Hearts, and 19 Silver Stars" Moulitsas (otherwise known as the biggest military bad-ass to start a blog) made fun of Blackwater personnel when they were burned and hung from a bridge because they "weren't real soldiers" and that he's basically Rambo's little brother. Someone probably should have reminded him that those guys were former Army Rangers and Navy SEALs (as is the case with most Blackwater personnel). Typical liberal bitch chest-pounding but whatever.....

Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Umm, study much history Alpha? Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson and FDR? Or perhaps WWI and WWII? I would say those gentleman defended the United States quite admirably.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Yes. I'm sure all the vets would want people not to have a voice in this.


















Douche.

GrizinWashington wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Umm, study much history Alpha? Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson and FDR? Or perhaps WWI and WWII? I would say those gentleman defended the United States quite admirably.

Wilson and FDR have a lot in common with the liberals of today don't they.

Nice try though.

GrizinWashington wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Umm, study much history Alpha? Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson and FDR? Or perhaps WWI and WWII? I would say those gentleman defended the United States quite admirably.

Do you honestly think that Woodrow Wilsons' or FDRs' ideas would be considered liberal?

Maybe we can educate them together at least you have a clue.

NrthFce wrote:Do you honestly think that Woodrow Wilsons' or FDRs' ideas would be considered liberal?

The cornerstone of FDR's campaign was the New Deal, right?

We know him as the President who guided us through WWII, and he did do a good job of that, but that doesn't mean he wasn't a liberal.

AlphaGriz1 wrote:

GrizinWashington wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Umm, study much history Alpha? Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson and FDR? Or perhaps WWI and WWII? I would say those gentleman defended the United States quite admirably.

Wilson and FDR have a lot in common with the liberals of today don't they.

Nice try though.

wilson ran for president on a platform of keeping us out of europ's problems for his second term.

Hell's Bells wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:

GrizinWashington wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Umm, study much history Alpha? Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson and FDR? Or perhaps WWI and WWII? I would say those gentleman defended the United States quite admirably.

Wilson and FDR have a lot in common with the liberals of today don't they.

Nice try though.

wilson ran for president on a platform of keeping us out of europ's problems for his second term.

STILL sounds like a damn good plan if you replace the "Europe" part with "the World".

Was it not George Washington who said we should not involve ourselves with the affairs of the rest of the world? What a wise man.

Only conservatives with military experience can defend this country. Like Bush, errr, Cheney, errr, ... whatever.

Don't forget Hillary, Obama, and Edwards.

grizzh8r wrote: Was it not George Washington who said we should not involve ourselves with the affairs of the rest of the world? What a wise man.

Yeah, George W. said that... back when the biggest threat to America was an armada of cannonball wielding warships traveling by sail from England. Vast oceans really aren't a viable reason for isolationism in today's day and age.

George W. also said that in a time before the industrial revolution, when cash crops were our country's top industry and global trade was hardly a concept let alone a viable idea. Imported items were vastly limited and expensive, not so today.

We'd be better off celebrating George Washington's democratic philosophies as opposed to his 1700's version of foreign policy.

NrthFce wrote:

GrizinWashington wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Umm, study much history Alpha? Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson and FDR? Or perhaps WWI and WWII? I would say those gentleman defended the United States quite admirably.

Do you honestly think that Woodrow Wilsons' or FDRs' ideas would be considered liberal?

Are you being serious??? If so, I recommend a remedial history course for you. FDR is widely considered the most-liberal of all Presidents. His New Deal plan was the ultimate liberalism. It also saved our country from possible economic ruin. Which is why I never understand why "liberal" is a bad term.

grizzh8r wrote:

Hell's Bells wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:

GrizinWashington wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Umm, study much history Alpha? Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson and FDR? Or perhaps WWI and WWII? I would say those gentleman defended the United States quite admirably.

Wilson and FDR have a lot in common with the liberals of today don't they.

Nice try though.

wilson ran for president on a platform of keeping us out of europ's problems for his second term.

STILL sounds like a damn good plan if you replace the "Europe" part with "the World".

Was it not George Washington who said we should not involve ourselves with the affairs of the rest of the world? What a wise man.

yeah but on the other hand one has to relize that it was wilson that clearly stated the case to go to war in europe in 1917.



for the history buffs in all of us guess which senator voted against going to war in 1917 (hint...only one to vote no and this senator is from mt...)

Hell's Bells wrote:

grizzh8r wrote:

Hell's Bells wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:

GrizinWashington wrote:

AlphaGriz1 wrote:Liberals should get no voice on how to defend this country. They don't know how, and if they did, they wouldn't.

Umm, study much history Alpha? Ever hear of Woodrow Wilson and FDR? Or perhaps WWI and WWII? I would say those gentleman defended the United States quite admirably.

Wilson and FDR have a lot in common with the liberals of today don't they.

Nice try though.

wilson ran for president on a platform of keeping us out of europ's problems for his second term.

STILL sounds like a damn good plan if you replace the "Europe" part with "the World".

Was it not George Washington who said we should not involve ourselves with the affairs of the rest of the world? What a wise man.

yeah but on the other hand one has to relize that it was wilson that clearly stated the case to go to war in europe in 1917.



for the history buffs in all of us guess which senator voted against going to war in 1917 (hint...only one to vote no and this senator is from mt...)

Rankin was a hottie.