
Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- Billings_Griz
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4637
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:01 pm
- Location: Flatlands
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
Yes.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
- rtb
- Moderator
- Posts: 8027
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:15 pm
- Location: Bend, OR
- Contact:
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
In basketball right now? No, that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
Big Sky Conf
Idaho St. 2-0
Northern Arizona 3-1
Portland St. 2-2
Northern Colorado 2-2
Eastern Wash. 2-2
Montana St. 1-1
Weber St. 1-1
Sacramento St. 1-3
Montana 0-2
Randy B. - MSU '04 

-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
Yeah, but records (facts) don't matter to (some) Griz fans. Like 5-4 is a better record than 17-2.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
- tampa_griz
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 5467
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 1:37 pm
- Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
Speaking of facts......crazycat wrote:Yeah, but records (facts) don't matter to (some) Griz fans.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
- Billings_Griz
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4637
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:01 pm
- Location: Flatlands
- Billings_Griz
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4637
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:01 pm
- Location: Flatlands
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
With any luck (and we need lots of it) the Cats and Griz could be tied after Saturday night.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No, that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
Big Sky Conf
Idaho St. 2-0
Northern Arizona 3-1
Portland St. 2-2
Northern Colorado 2-2
Eastern Wash. 2-2
Montana St. 1-1
Weber St. 1-1
Sacramento St. 1-3
Montana 0-2

- rtb
- Moderator
- Posts: 8027
- Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:15 pm
- Location: Bend, OR
- Contact:
- Billings_Griz
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4637
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:01 pm
- Location: Flatlands
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
Oh, I don't think you'll need much luck. We're toast after burning up all our energy trying to catch Sac and they will still be celebrating when UM gets there. So UM 103, SSU 48. NAU 81, MSU 65. We'll both be 1-2, but not in last place. Yippee!!! Sac will be 1-4.Billings_Griz wrote:With any luck (and we need lots of it) the Cats and Griz could be tied after Saturday night.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No, that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
Big Sky Conf
Idaho St. 2-0
Northern Arizona 3-1
Portland St. 2-2
Northern Colorado 2-2
Eastern Wash. 2-2
Montana St. 1-1
Weber St. 1-1
Sacramento St. 1-3
Montana 0-2
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:00 pm
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
are you saying that if we would have won last night that we wouldn't have used as much energy? or are you actually implying that with every road trip we are going to lose the second game because of wasted energy in the first? either way, i have to say that i disagree with you. these guys are in amazing shape, and last nights game wasn't even as up-and-down as most. but thanks for the confidence heading into the game.crazycat wrote:Oh, I don't think you'll need much luck. We're toast after burning up all our energy trying to catch Sac and they will still be celebrating when UM gets there. So UM 103, SSU 48. NAU 81, MSU 65. We'll both be 1-2, but not in last place. Yippee!!! Sac will be 1-4.Billings_Griz wrote:With any luck (and we need lots of it) the Cats and Griz could be tied after Saturday night.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No, that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
Big Sky Conf
Idaho St. 2-0
Northern Arizona 3-1
Portland St. 2-2
Northern Colorado 2-2
Eastern Wash. 2-2
Montana St. 1-1
Weber St. 1-1
Sacramento St. 1-3
Montana 0-2


do you have to know everything to post here? or just think you do?
- grizzh8r
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7325
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:23 pm
- Location: Billings via Livingston
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
Was that sarcasm? I only ask because the CSUS/NAU trip is THE most grueling in the Big Sky Conference, especially when you have to go from sea level to 7k feet (the other way around isn't quite so bad). Then add in the effect of working their a$$es off (twice) in the 2nd half last night only to lose to a terrible team on a bad break/call or five, AND playing an afternoon game instead of an evening game tomorrow...whitetrashgriz wrote:are you saying that if we would have won last night that we wouldn't have used as much energy? or are you actually implying that with every road trip we are going to lose the second game because of wasted energy in the first? either way, i have to say that i disagree with you. these guys are in amazing shape, and last nights game wasn't even as up-and-down as most. but thanks for the confidence heading into the game.crazycat wrote:Oh, I don't think you'll need much luck. We're toast after burning up all our energy trying to catch Sac and they will still be celebrating when UM gets there. So UM 103, SSU 48. NAU 81, MSU 65. We'll both be 1-2, but not in last place. Yippee!!! Sac will be 1-4.Billings_Griz wrote:With any luck (and we need lots of it) the Cats and Griz could be tied after Saturday night.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No, that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
Big Sky Conf
Idaho St. 2-0
Northern Arizona 3-1
Portland St. 2-2
Northern Colorado 2-2
Eastern Wash. 2-2
Montana St. 1-1
Weber St. 1-1
Sacramento St. 1-3
Montana 0-2and you can't be serious with your scores. um wins by 55 and the cats lose by 15? honestly, do you know much about basketball, or are you more of a football guy? your name suits you perfectly.

I would not be at all surprised if the scenerio crazycat proposed did indeed happen. I know the Cats will put up a helluva fight, but I just don't know if they will have the legs tomorrow. We do have a fairly deep bench working in our favor, but even the radio broadcasters hate that trip. I remember Dean lamenting about it on the Sports Nuts a few years ago. I said it this morning and will say it again, the Griz will probably steamroll the Hairnets tomorrow night.
Eric Curry STILL makes me sad.

94VegasCat wrote:Are you for real? That is just a plain ol dumb paragraph! You just nailed every note in the Full Reetard sing-a-long choir!!!

-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
I'm amazed at how people on this board call the egriz board a bunch of sugarcoaters and then in the same breath try to minimize losses to the likes of UNC football and SSU hoops (this year's edition). I mean these two teams are BAD. Is it the end of the season? No, of course not. But at the end of the season there's nothing worse than losing to teams like these knowing that had we beat them it may have made a difference in our overall year. In 2002 we were able to bounce back after losing to SSU and last year we came back in FB after losing to Chadron and losing three straight, so obviously it can be done again, but to act like it's no big deal is pure folly. Hopefully it'll have some kind of positive effect in that it ingrains the notion that you can't overlook anyone and that you must stay focused.grizzh8r wrote:Was that sarcasm? I only ask because the CSUS/NAU trip is THE most grueling in the Big Sky Conference, especially when you have to go from sea level to 7k feet (the other way around isn't quite so bad). Then add in the effect of working their a$$es off (twice) in the 2nd half last night only to lose to a terrible team on a bad break/call or five, AND playing an afternoon game instead of an evening game tomorrow...whitetrashgriz wrote:are you saying that if we would have won last night that we wouldn't have used as much energy? or are you actually implying that with every road trip we are going to lose the second game because of wasted energy in the first? either way, i have to say that i disagree with you. these guys are in amazing shape, and last nights game wasn't even as up-and-down as most. but thanks for the confidence heading into the game.crazycat wrote:Oh, I don't think you'll need much luck. We're toast after burning up all our energy trying to catch Sac and they will still be celebrating when UM gets there. So UM 103, SSU 48. NAU 81, MSU 65. We'll both be 1-2, but not in last place. Yippee!!! Sac will be 1-4.Billings_Griz wrote:With any luck (and we need lots of it) the Cats and Griz could be tied after Saturday night.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No, that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
Big Sky Conf
Idaho St. 2-0
Northern Arizona 3-1
Portland St. 2-2
Northern Colorado 2-2
Eastern Wash. 2-2
Montana St. 1-1
Weber St. 1-1
Sacramento St. 1-3
Montana 0-2and you can't be serious with your scores. um wins by 55 and the cats lose by 15? honestly, do you know much about basketball, or are you more of a football guy? your name suits you perfectly.
![]()
I would not be at all surprised if the scenerio crazycat proposed did indeed happen. I know the Cats will put up a helluva fight, but I just don't know if they will have the legs tomorrow. We do have a fairly deep bench working in our favor, but even the radio broadcasters hate that trip. I remember Dean lamenting about it on the Sports Nuts a few years ago. I said it this morning and will say it again, the Griz will probably steamroll the Hairnets tomorrow night.
We weren't really that far from being in the playoffs last year in football. A win over arguably the worst team in the FCS might've been enough to get us past NAU or UM (both at home). Do that and we're 8-3 and we're fully confident heading into 2008. Losing to teams like these is a huge psychological wound. We'll see. Hopefully we can pull it out tomorrow somehow and I can eat my words, they'll taste delicious.
-
- Member # Retired
- Posts: 2081
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:11 pm
- Location: Bozeman, Montana
- Contact:
This year has a lot of similarities to 2002 in my mind. One of them is that we lost at Sacramento State to break a long win streak (10 then, 5 now) and then won at NAU the next night. That was the one year when Friday-Saturday scheduling was used. So it can be done. But I don't know why Sacramento State and/or Northern Colorado seem to bite us so often, when they don't pose too many problems for everybody else.
GO CATS!
It's always a good day to be a Bobcat fan!

My name is Steve, if you'd like to know.
It's always a good day to be a Bobcat fan!



My name is Steve, if you'd like to know.
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm
It is without a doubt bizarre. The eighth wonder of the world. If ever there's been a school that should know from experience that it needs to guard against this, it's MSU. Maybe that's the answer. We're so worried it's going to happen again, once it starts to happen all those past nightmares creep in and boo-hoo.bozbobcat wrote:This year has a lot of similarities to 2002 in my mind. One of them is that we lost at Sacramento State to break a long win streak (10 then, 5 now) and then won at NAU the next night. That was the one year when Friday-Saturday scheduling was used. So it can be done. But I don't know why Sacramento State and/or Northern Colorado seem to bite us so often, when they don't pose too many problems for everybody else.
-
- BobcatNation Hall of Famer
- Posts: 3381
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:00 pm
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
no...it wasn't sarcasm. trust me, i know all about the trip. let me say first that despite their record, sac state is not terrible. i have had the opportunity to watch them play southern utah and they have enough talent to beat some teams this year. second, they have given us problems their for as long as i can remember. if you recall, my first post after the loss was that this is the trip that i fear the most. so in one breath you say what a hard trip it is, and in the next say you wouldn't be surprised if we lose our next game by 50! all i am saying is we lost a close game on the road by one point in a conference where no one has any idea who will be at the top. honestly, when all is said and done i wouldn't be surprised if a team with a .500 gets in the tourney. this team has more heart than any that we have seen in years. the trip is always hard, and the players and coaches know that this isn't an excuse. we have won their before after playing at sac, and their is no reason we can't again. so you guys keep believing that this team will lose by 50, and i'll keep believing that they have more character than you guys give them credit for. i'm not about to get into a pissing match with other fans 2 games into the season about how bad this team is. they are still very talented, and very well coached. and if anyone wants to put actual money where their moths are on this fifty point nonsense i'd be happy to.grizzh8r wrote:Was that sarcasm? I only ask because the CSUS/NAU trip is THE most grueling in the Big Sky Conference, especially when you have to go from sea level to 7k feet (the other way around isn't quite so bad). Then add in the effect of working their a$$es off (twice) in the 2nd half last night only to lose to a terrible team on a bad break/call or five, AND playing an afternoon game instead of an evening game tomorrow...whitetrashgriz wrote:are you saying that if we would have won last night that we wouldn't have used as much energy? or are you actually implying that with every road trip we are going to lose the second game because of wasted energy in the first? either way, i have to say that i disagree with you. these guys are in amazing shape, and last nights game wasn't even as up-and-down as most. but thanks for the confidence heading into the game.crazycat wrote:Oh, I don't think you'll need much luck. We're toast after burning up all our energy trying to catch Sac and they will still be celebrating when UM gets there. So UM 103, SSU 48. NAU 81, MSU 65. We'll both be 1-2, but not in last place. Yippee!!! Sac will be 1-4.Billings_Griz wrote:With any luck (and we need lots of it) the Cats and Griz could be tied after Saturday night.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No, that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
Big Sky Conf
Idaho St. 2-0
Northern Arizona 3-1
Portland St. 2-2
Northern Colorado 2-2
Eastern Wash. 2-2
Montana St. 1-1
Weber St. 1-1
Sacramento St. 1-3
Montana 0-2and you can't be serious with your scores. um wins by 55 and the cats lose by 15? honestly, do you know much about basketball, or are you more of a football guy? your name suits you perfectly.
![]()
I would not be at all surprised if the scenerio crazycat proposed did indeed happen. I know the Cats will put up a helluva fight, but I just don't know if they will have the legs tomorrow. We do have a fairly deep bench working in our favor, but even the radio broadcasters hate that trip. I remember Dean lamenting about it on the Sports Nuts a few years ago. I said it this morning and will say it again, the Griz will probably steamroll the Hairnets tomorrow night.

do you have to know everything to post here? or just think you do?
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7992
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm
-
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 4432
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
Wow, you just said.......nothing. Sac State isn't terrible, because they played well against SUU and they will win a few games? How many is a few? 3? So 3-13, that's not terrible?whitetrashgriz wrote:no...it wasn't sarcasm. trust me, i know all about the trip. let me say first that despite their record, sac state is not terrible. i have had the opportunity to watch them play southern utah and they have enough talent to beat some teams this year. second, they have given us problems their for as long as i can remember. if you recall, my first post after the loss was that this is the trip that i fear the most. so in one breath you say what a hard trip it is, and in the next say you wouldn't be surprised if we lose our next game by 50! all i am saying is we lost a close game on the road by one point in a conference where no one has any idea who will be at the top. honestly, when all is said and done i wouldn't be surprised if a team with a .500 gets in the tourney. this team has more heart than any that we have seen in years. the trip is always hard, and the players and coaches know that this isn't an excuse. we have won their before after playing at sac, and their is no reason we can't again. so you guys keep believing that this team will lose by 50, and i'll keep believing that they have more character than you guys give them credit for. i'm not about to get into a pissing match with other fans 2 games into the season about how bad this team is. they are still very talented, and very well coached. and if anyone wants to put actual money where their moths are on this fifty point nonsense i'd be happy to.grizzh8r wrote:Was that sarcasm? I only ask because the CSUS/NAU trip is THE most grueling in the Big Sky Conference, especially when you have to go from sea level to 7k feet (the other way around isn't quite so bad). Then add in the effect of working their a$$es off (twice) in the 2nd half last night only to lose to a terrible team on a bad break/call or five, AND playing an afternoon game instead of an evening game tomorrow...whitetrashgriz wrote:are you saying that if we would have won last night that we wouldn't have used as much energy? or are you actually implying that with every road trip we are going to lose the second game because of wasted energy in the first? either way, i have to say that i disagree with you. these guys are in amazing shape, and last nights game wasn't even as up-and-down as most. but thanks for the confidence heading into the game.crazycat wrote:Oh, I don't think you'll need much luck. We're toast after burning up all our energy trying to catch Sac and they will still be celebrating when UM gets there. So UM 103, SSU 48. NAU 81, MSU 65. We'll both be 1-2, but not in last place. Yippee!!! Sac will be 1-4.Billings_Griz wrote:With any luck (and we need lots of it) the Cats and Griz could be tied after Saturday night.rtb wrote:In basketball right now? No, that would the the winless Griz.Billings_Griz wrote:Are these two the "bottom of the barrel" of the BSC?
Big Sky Conf
Idaho St. 2-0
Northern Arizona 3-1
Portland St. 2-2
Northern Colorado 2-2
Eastern Wash. 2-2
Montana St. 1-1
Weber St. 1-1
Sacramento St. 1-3
Montana 0-2and you can't be serious with your scores. um wins by 55 and the cats lose by 15? honestly, do you know much about basketball, or are you more of a football guy? your name suits you perfectly.
![]()
I would not be at all surprised if the scenerio crazycat proposed did indeed happen. I know the Cats will put up a helluva fight, but I just don't know if they will have the legs tomorrow. We do have a fairly deep bench working in our favor, but even the radio broadcasters hate that trip. I remember Dean lamenting about it on the Sports Nuts a few years ago. I said it this morning and will say it again, the Griz will probably steamroll the Hairnets tomorrow night.
Everyone realizes that SSU has given us trouble there forever.
No one's questioning their character or saying we'll lose by 50. Show me where someone said we'll lose by 50. NAU is good, so are we, but I would say the same thing about anyone else in our conference if they were in the same situation.
I don't recall anyone saying we have a bad team. We're talking about losing to SSU and that it's a game we should've won and what the long term effect of it will be. I'm basically saying losses like this 'tend' to come back to haunt you and that this loss is the type that is hard to rebound from both physically and emotionally.
- grizzh8r
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7325
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 11:23 pm
- Location: Billings via Livingston
Re: Northern Colorado and Sacramento State
Come on wtg; don't put words in my mouth... Nowhere did I say we would lose by 50, nor did CC. We said CSUS might lose by 50 to UM.whitetrashgriz wrote:no...it wasn't sarcasm. trust me, i know all about the trip. let me say first that despite their record, sac state is not terrible. i have had the opportunity to watch them play southern utah and they have enough talent to beat some teams this year. second, they have given us problems their for as long as i can remember. if you recall, my first post after the loss was that this is the trip that i fear the most. so in one breath you say what a hard trip it is, and in the next say you wouldn't be surprised if we lose our next game by 50! all i am saying is we lost a close game on the road by one point in a conference where no one has any idea who will be at the top. honestly, when all is said and done i wouldn't be surprised if a team with a .500 gets in the tourney. this team has more heart than any that we have seen in years. the trip is always hard, and the players and coaches know that this isn't an excuse. we have won their before after playing at sac, and their is no reason we can't again. so you guys keep believing that this team will lose by 50, and i'll keep believing that they have more character than you guys give them credit for. i'm not about to get into a pissing match with other fans 2 games into the season about how bad this team is. they are still very talented, and very well coached. and if anyone wants to put actual money where their moths are on this fifty point nonsense i'd be happy to.

The sky is not falling and we don't have a "bad" team, I am just a literalist. After all, I am a Bobcat fan!

Eric Curry STILL makes me sad.

94VegasCat wrote:Are you for real? That is just a plain ol dumb paragraph! You just nailed every note in the Full Reetard sing-a-long choir!!!
