Page 1 of 1

Sports Network picks MSU #4

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:47 pm
by Griznationalist
The Sports Network picks MSU to finish 4th, which is in the upper half of the conference. :thumbup: This article credits MSU, EWU, NAU, Weber, Sac St, NCU, PSU, and ISU for being “respectful of a legacy of dominance” by UM. That’s another way of saying all fans of the BSC are a class act, which is a credit to our conference as a whole. =D^

FCS Season Preview: Big Sky
By Andrew Gaddess, FCS Contributing Editor

The Montana Grizzlies football program has an impressive track record: 24 consecutive winning seasons, a Football Championship Subdivision record 17 consecutive playoff appearances, 12 consecutive outright or co-Big Sky Conference titles and a Division I-leading 119 victories over the last 10 years.

This is success on an inspiring yet humbling scale. Inspiring to opponents motivated by showdowns with the best and humbling to those same opponents respectful of a legacy of dominance. Both as inspiring and as humbling as the open air and wondrous natural beauty from which Montana's conference draws its name: the Big Sky.

Following is a team-by-team breakdown of the 2010 Big Sky race:

The Sports Network's predicted order of finish:

1. Montana 2. Eastern Washington 3. Northern Arizona 4. Montana State 5. Weber State 6. Sacramento State 7. Northern Colorado 8. Portland State 9. Idaho State

http://www.sportsnetwork.com/merge/tsnf ... id=4335579" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Sports Network picks MSU #4

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:22 pm
by seataccat
I think this was posted in the college athletics section where it belongs a couple months ago. :roll:

Re: Sports Network picks MSU #4

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:50 pm
by starcolt1110
seataccat wrote:I think this was posted in the college athletics section where it belongs a couple months ago. :roll:

And i just think you should never forget what other totally objective sports writers think of the GRIZ, and the rest of you CHUMPS!

Re: Sports Network picks MSU #4

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 8:41 pm
by FTG06'
starcolt1110 wrote:
seataccat wrote:I think this was posted in the college athletics section where it belongs a couple months ago. :roll:

And i just think you should never forget what other totally objective sports writers think of the GRIZ, and the rest of you CHUMPS!
I see only one chump here.

Re: Sports Network picks MSU #4

Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 9:11 pm
by Whisky_Ditch
Griznationalist wrote:The Sports Network picks MSU to finish 4th, which is in the upper half of the conference. :thumbup: This article credits MSU, EWU, NAU, Weber, Sac St, NCU, PSU, and ISU for being “respectful of a legacy of dominance” by UM. That’s another way of saying all fans of the BSC are a class act, which is a credit to our conference as a whole. =D^

FCS Season Preview: Big Sky
By Andrew Gaddess, FCS Contributing Editor

The Montana Grizzlies football program has an impressive track record: 24 consecutive winning seasons, a Football Championship Subdivision record 17 consecutive playoff appearances, 12 consecutive outright or co-Big Sky Conference titles and a Division I-leading 119 victories over the last 10 years.

This is success on an inspiring yet humbling scale. Inspiring to opponents motivated by showdowns with the best and humbling to those same opponents respectful of a legacy of dominance. Both as inspiring and as humbling as the open air and wondrous natural beauty from which Montana's conference draws its name: the Big Sky.

Following is a team-by-team breakdown of the 2010 Big Sky race:

The Sports Network's predicted order of finish:

1. Montana 2. Eastern Washington 3. Northern Arizona 4. Montana State 5. Weber State 6. Sacramento State 7. Northern Colorado 8. Portland State 9. Idaho State

http://www.sportsnetwork.com/merge/tsnf ... id=4335579" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
You might as well move this to smack talk, because this is a condescending as it gets. This is another reason why I can't stand Griz fans.

Re: Sports Network picks MSU #4

Posted: Tue Sep 14, 2010 5:31 pm
by AlphaGriz1
4 seems a bit high