The biggest playoff loss at home in the history of MT?
Posted: Sat Dec 04, 2010 6:49 pm
I'm talking margins of course 

Bobcat Nation Forums
http://bobcatnation.com/bobcatbb/
how'd the griz do today? you do realize the griz had more California players on its roster this year than Montanan's - well, maybe not since your focus seems to be on the Cats!PBRgriz wrote:Easily. Big boys can't hang in the big time.
Maybe the fan who booked the tickets to Frisco will do some nice sightseeing while he's there![]()
![]()
![]()
At least they'll be able to see where Texas State-Bozeman's roots are.
Yeah I am sure the Cats would really be bummed to play in the championship.AlphaOAlum wrote:Not by margin, but I'd say making it to the NC twice in a row and not being able to put your money where your mouth is must be pretty embarrassing for the maroon....
Way to use your big boy words!Thanks for choking on a big d*ck in your big moment at home.
That is a LIE!MSU Toddler wrote:how'd the griz do today? you do realize the griz had more California players on its roster this year than Montanan's - well, maybe not since your focus seems to be on the Cats!PBRgriz wrote:Easily. Big boys can't hang in the big time.
Maybe the fan who booked the tickets to Frisco will do some nice sightseeing while he's there![]()
![]()
![]()
At least they'll be able to see where Texas State-Bozeman's roots are.
GoCats18 wrote:Yeah, you guy are right, we suck. At least we kicked your asses though and at least ended all your pretty little streaks, and at least we weren't the ones sitting home yesterday. That was a well played game up until the last few minutes. I could care less about the final score, it is the fact that things are changing in the Big Sky and your team is not the top dog any more. All you have left is to talk smalk, because your team is not any good and you guys know it.
Nice logic, idiot. You've just admitted that the Cats average above capacity. By your screwed up logic, where the Cats are "pathetic" for only averaging only 102% of capacity, UCLA should be able to hammer Oregon's attendance as "pathetic" because UO only averaged 108% of capacity (2009 final numbers). You know, since UCLA averaged 64k per game and Oregon "only" averaged 58k per game.PBRgriz wrote:GoCats18 wrote:Yeah, you guy are right, we suck. At least we kicked your asses though and at least ended all your pretty little streaks, and at least we weren't the ones sitting home yesterday. That was a well played game up until the last few minutes. I could care less about the final score, it is the fact that things are changing in the Big Sky and your team is not the top dog any more. All you have left is to talk smalk, because your team is not any good and you guys know it.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Kicked our asses? Please. We handed the ball over to you twice in the redzone and still barely lost. Your best team EVER and you BARELY beat our WORST team in 10 years!!!
It's a down year fellas, and we'll take it after seeing you blow chunks in the playoffs. Buncha amateurs. We're the flagship in this conference and state, and we have the rings to prove it, oh and we actually win when it counts (the playoffs).
You'll always be second fiddle. No matter how many Texans you try to bring up to your stadium. Which barely averages 15,000 fans. Pathetic.