Page 1 of 1
69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:49 am
by The Mooses Whistle
69-36-5

Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:51 am
by tdub
The Mooses Whistle wrote:69-36-5
= Moose Knuckles measurements (Ass - Man boobs - brain)
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:51 am
by allcat
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:57 am
by ImagineSanta
The Mooses Whistle wrote:69-36-5

Well, you had a good run there Moose Knuckle. See ya!
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:58 am
by Go Scats Go
tdub wrote:The Mooses Whistle wrote:69-36-5
= Moose Knuckles measurements (Ass - Man boobs - brain)
So did I miss something... was his stat incorrect?
Cat fans are like liberals, when the facts don't fit what they want, they attack the carrier. You can always tell what scares a liberal/cat fan, they attack what scares them.
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:00 am
by doebrmn
I love it when idiots post this record because it demonstrates they are complete morons. Take a look at the record. Much of the disparity came in the first half of the 20th century, when of course MSU was still a small agricultural college and the University was a considerably larger school. In fact, during the portion of the century, UM was actually MSU. It would be similar to MSU fans running around like the typical Griz moron and bragging about a superior record against Carroll College or Western. If you have the ability, because perhaps you are just too stupid, look at the record in the modern ERA and you will find that it is much closer like most rivalry. But then again, expecting a Griz fan to have that intellectual ability is probably asking too much.
Oh and BTW, the only game that counts was the last one, and you lost so live with it loser.......................
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:01 am
by tdub
Go Scats Go wrote:tdub wrote:The Mooses Whistle wrote:69-36-5
= Moose Knuckles measurements (Ass - Man boobs - brain)
So did I miss something... was his stat incorrect?
Cat fans are like liberals, when the facts don't fit what they want, they attack the carrier. You can always tell what scares a liberal/cat fan, they attack what scares them.
I didn't say that was the ONLY thing it equalled...I'm just think I'm right about knucklehead.
He was warned already to put this stuff on the smack board...or bye-bye.
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:16 am
by Bobcatsinmso
The mooses whistle blows byu fans...ok now we send this to the smack boards

Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:16 am
by The Mooses Whistle
doebrmn wrote:I love it when idiots post this record because it demonstrates they are complete morons. Take a look at the record. Much of the disparity came in the first half of the 20th century, when of course MSU was still a small agricultural college and the University was a considerably larger school. In fact, during the portion of the century, UM was actually MSU. It would be similar to MSU fans running around like the typical Griz moron and bragging about a superior record against Carroll College or Western. If you have the ability, because perhaps you are just too stupid, look at the record in the modern ERA and you will find that it is much closer like most rivalry. But then again, expecting a Griz fan to have that intellectual ability is probably asking too much.
Oh and BTW, the only game that counts was the last one, and you lost so live with it loser.......................
Montana still owns the better record in the modern era. Deal with it. You don't get to take away losses simply because your school didn't have as many students; Bottom line: 69-36-5
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:18 am
by allcat
All this guy does is post smack.
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:20 am
by [cat_bracket]
Yes, it’s a fact. So is the fact that UM was NCAA (in the same conf that is now the PAC 12), while MSU was NAIA for most of the 1897 to 1962 part of this series. UM was 42-15-5 from ’97 to ’62. It’s 27-21 since.
And it’s also a fact that you’re a welch.
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 11:37 am
by doebrmn
Here let me do the math for you moron. Since 1950 (what is considered the modern ERA of college football, the record is 35-26, wow that is just a landslide. What is even more interesting is that since 1956, MSU's first National Championship, it is 29-26. Wow, even more of a landslide for the idiots from UM. Yeah, this is really a one-sided rivarly. If I was you, I would keep acting like most Jump on the Band Wagon Griz fans and go around bragging like an idiot.
Oh yeah, and you lost last year so live with it you pathetic moron..........................
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:38 pm
by [cat_bracket]
So UM was in the PAC-12 (PCC) and failed there. Went to the MWC (Mountain States) and failed there. Went to the Big Sky and failed there from 63-68, so they cheated to be good (Swartout 69-70), got caught (failed at cheating) and finally did something in the late 80s.
Now they want to go back to the big ranks and join the WAC. Hey, who knows, maybe they got it right this time.
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:42 pm
by GrizinWashington
the only game that counts was the last one
If you actually believe this, the Cats sure have been completely irrelevant over much of the past two decades.
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:18 pm
by cats2506
GrizinWashington wrote:the only game that counts was the last one
If you actually believe this, the Cats sure have been completely irrelevant over much of the past two decades.
and you are irrelevant now
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:27 pm
by GrizinWashington
cats2506 wrote:GrizinWashington wrote:the only game that counts was the last one
If you actually believe this, the Cats sure have been completely irrelevant over much of the past two decades.
and you are irrelevant now
Not in the least, because I don't subscribe to the ridiculous theory that the last game is the only one that mattered.
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:49 pm
by [cat_bracket]
GrizinWashington wrote:cats2506 wrote:GrizinWashington wrote:the only game that counts was the last one
If you actually believe this, the Cats sure have been completely irrelevant over much of the past two decades.
and you are irrelevant now
Not in the least, because I don't subscribe to the ridiculous theory that the last game is the only one that mattered.
That's convenient. Since you haven't won a last game in 10 years.
Re: 69-36-5
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:36 pm
by CPACAT
Go Scats Go wrote:tdub wrote:The Mooses Whistle wrote:69-36-5
= Moose Knuckles measurements (Ass - Man boobs - brain)
So did I miss something... was his stat incorrect?
Cat fans are like liberals, when the facts don't fit what they want, they attack the carrier. You can always tell what scares a liberal/cat fan, they attack what scares them.
Shut up douche bag. You opinion has no validity regarding anything. You are a worthless welcher. If you had any character at all you would be long gone from this board.