Blah

The Butcher · Post by **The Butcher** » Fri Nov 25, 2011 10:22 pm

TomCat88 wrote:Considering all the distractions from the Montana DUI charge, finding out about Middleton's DUI and the Johnson/Kemp charges he should've won it even if UM had lost to MSU last week. I beleive there were a couple other off-season issues with DUIs, too. He did a good job keeping his team focused through all of that.

I think his lack of internal control had a lot to do with these distractions...

GrizinWashington · Post by **GrizinWashington** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 3:31 am

The Butcher wrote:
TomCat88 wrote:Considering all the distractions from the Montana DUI charge, finding out about Middleton's DUI and the Johnson/Kemp charges he should've won it even if UM had lost to MSU last week. I beleive there were a couple other off-season issues with DUIs, too. He did a good job keeping his team focused through all of that.
I think his lack of internal control had a lot to do with these distractions...

I think Ash's lack of internal control leads to players destroying property and breaking into the homes of elected officials....

Bobcatsinmso · Post by **Bobcatsinmso** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:05 am

Oh yes, and that happens year after year after year with coach Ash, just like in missoula......

LongTimeCatFan · Post by **LongTimeCatFan** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 1:42 pm

GrizinWashington wrote:
The Butcher wrote:
TomCat88 wrote:Considering all the distractions from the Montana DUI charge, finding out about Middleton's DUI and the Johnson/Kemp charges he should've won it even if UM had lost to MSU last week. I beleive there were a couple other off-season issues with DUIs, too. He did a good job keeping his team focused through all of that.
I think his lack of internal control had a lot to do with these distractions...

I think Ash's lack of internal control leads to players destroying property and breaking into the homes of elected officials....

there you go again.... back to your dUMb ways

GrizinWashington · Post by **GrizinWashington** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 7:46 pm

Thanks for moving this to SMACK Mods, where it belonged to begin with.

catsack · Post by **catsack** » Sat Nov 26, 2011 8:52 pm

Well I'm sure glad you guys got the Thomas brothers. How'd that work out for you? You probably could use those big nasty linemen .

catbooster · Post by **catbooster** » Tue Nov 29, 2011 12:41 pm

catsack wrote:Well I'm sure glad you guys got the Thomas brothers. How'd that work out for you? You probably could use those big nasty linemen .

It's worked out great. It did hurt when Ash wouldn't let them start our DII game, but you have to enforce some standards for the team...wait...what?..oh, nevermind.

catsack · Post by **catsack** » Tue Nov 29, 2011 8:38 pm

catbooster wrote:
catsack wrote:Well I'm sure glad you guys got the Thomas brothers. How'd that work out for you? You probably could use those big nasty linemen .
It's worked out great. It did hurt when Ash wouldn't let them start our DII game, but you have to enforce some standards for the team...wait...what?..oh, nevermind.

It was the Weber game should have left them on the bench , it was over before they got on the field . Nice try !

catbooster · Post by **catbooster** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 2:08 am

catsack wrote:
catbooster wrote:
catsack wrote:Well I'm sure glad you guys got the Thomas brothers. How'd that work out for you? You probably could use those big nasty linemen .
It's worked out great. It did hurt when Ash wouldn't let them start our DII game, but you have to enforce some standards for the team...wait...what?..oh, nevermind.
It was the Weber game should have left them on the bench , it was over before they got on the field . Nice try !

You're right, my mistake - it was the Weber game. That changes everything. I'm surprised the ACLU isn't suing UM for violating their constitutional rights with such a cruel punishment.

Since the game was going well for the Griz, and they didn't need those players to win, apparently you think they should have kept them on the bench. I guess if they might be needed for the Griz to win, the punishment should be one quarter. That allows the coaches to see how the game is going before a final decision is made on the punishment? Is that what you're saying? Sure looks like it.

catsack · Post by **catsack** » Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:31 am

catbooster wrote:
catsack wrote:
catbooster wrote:
catsack wrote:Well I'm sure glad you guys got the Thomas brothers. How'd that work out for you? You probably could use those big nasty linemen .
It's worked out great. It did hurt when Ash wouldn't let them start our DII game, but you have to enforce some standards for the team...wait...what?..oh, nevermind.
It was the Weber game should have left them on the bench , it was over before they got on the field . Nice try !
You're right, my mistake - it was the Weber game. That changes everything. I'm surprised the ACLU isn't suing UM for violating their constitutional rights with such a cruel punishment.

Since the game was going well for the Griz, and they didn't need those players to win, apparently you think they should have kept them on the bench. I guess if they might be needed for the Griz to win, the punishment should be one quarter. That allows the coaches to see how the game is going before a final decision is made on the punishment? Is that what you're saying? Sure looks like it.

I think the punishment was weak! I think it probably should have been a game suspension, bu t have to assume the coaches did what was appropriate .

Blah

Blah

Re: Big Sky Conference football Coach of the Year

Re: Big Sky Conference football Coach of the Year

Re: Big Sky Conference football Coach of the Year

Re: Blah

Re: Blah

Re: Blah

Re: Blah

Re: Blah

Re: Blah