Who's going to win Scientifically

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply
mslacat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6117
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:12 am
Contact:

Who's going to win Scientifically

Post by mslacat » Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:05 pm

OK, I was just in a doctors waiting room and read an olllllllld Sporting news Mag. In it , it had an artical that scientifically broke down how to determine who will a conference title. After reviewing ten years of D-1 football conferences the author claims that the overwhelming key to success does not rely on having a running or passing game. It is not always defence that wins but it is the team with the top 1 or 2 offencive line wins 90% of the time the second most critical position is an experianced quality quarterback. The author does point out though that even with a maginal to poor quarterback but an out standing offencive line that your chances of winning go up substantially. It is the offencive line baby!!!!

So given this guys theroy (it makes sence but I do not know if I would bet the house on it) who would you football heads feel has the best chance of winning the Big Sky? Who has the best O-line or O-line / Quarterback combo?


You elected a ****** RAPIST to be our President

User avatar
Cat-theotherwhitemeat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3156
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Billings
Contact:

Re: Who's going to win Scientifically

Post by Cat-theotherwhitemeat » Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:25 pm

mslacat wrote:OK, I was just in a doctors waiting room and read an olllllllld Sporting news Mag. In it , it had an artical that scientifically broke down how to determine who will a conference title. After reviewing ten years of D-1 football conferences the author claims that the overwhelming key to success does not rely on having a running or passing game. It is not always defence that wins but it is the team with the top 1 or 2 offencive line wins 90% of the time the second most critical position is an experianced quality quarterback. The author does point out though that even with a maginal to poor quarterback but an out standing offencive line that your chances of winning go up substantially. It is the offencive line baby!!!!

So given this guys theroy (it makes sence but I do not know if I would bet the house on it) who would you football heads feel has the best chance of winning the Big Sky? Who has the best O-line or O-line / Quarterback combo?
oooh, let me guess.....


My avatar does not now, nor has in the past, depict a person of mentally challenged state. If you have a problem with it, please call the U.S. department of Bite my A$$. MTBuff/Administrator.

User avatar
jagur1
Member # Retired
Posts: 2015
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:53 pm
Location: Billings

Post by jagur1 » Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:32 pm

Who does have the Best BSC O Line? Not NAU since they lost 4 starters, Griz talented but young lost 3 starters but no freshman starters. What is the scoop on EWU, Weber, ISU? Cats looked good on Dec 1st but have lost some talent since then, young also.
Last edited by jagur1 on Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.


Never mistake activity for accomplishment.

I'm sick of the man because the man is a thief.

Four

User avatar
CARDIAC_CATS
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7857
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:37 am

Re: Who's going to win Scientifically

Post by CARDIAC_CATS » Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:39 pm

mslacat wrote:OK, I was just in a doctors waiting room and read an olllllllld Sporting news Mag. In it , it had an artical that scientifically broke down how to determine who will a conference title. After reviewing ten years of D-1 football conferences the author claims that the overwhelming key to success does not rely on having a running or passing game. It is not always defence that wins but it is the team with the top 1 or 2 offencive line wins 90% of the time the second most critical position is an experianced quality quarterback. The author does point out though that even with a maginal to poor quarterback but an out standing offencive line that your chances of winning go up substantially. It is the offencive line baby!!!!

So given this guys theroy (it makes sence but I do not know if I would bet the house on it) who would you football heads feel has the best chance of winning the Big Sky? Who has the best O-line or O-line / Quarterback combo?
If thats the case, there should be 5-6 teams competing very closely for the title this year. I wonder if it makes any difference on experienced QB's who can also run and also PUNT WELL? :)



User avatar
JahGriz
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:28 am
Contact:

Post by JahGriz » Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:40 pm

The Grizzlies have a bright future given those statistics. We had one of the better OL recruiting classes I've seen, including insiders.com 131 rated o-lineman, Cody Balogh.
And on paper Berquist looks like a heck of a QB, 80th ranked QB on insiders.com with over 60% completions in H.S.


Am I right mslacat? :shock:

I must admit though, I have not idea who will have the best O-line in the BSC this season...hopefully da'Griz. Anyone have an arguement as to who they think will have the best o-line in the Sky.
Last edited by JahGriz on Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.



User avatar
JahGriz
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 683
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:28 am
Contact:

Post by JahGriz » Fri Jul 30, 2004 12:51 pm

As a note, swami on anygivensaturday picks Cory Procter of UM as a 3rd team preseason all-american and Jeff Bolton of MSU as a 4th team preseason all-american.
As honorable mention picks he's got Steve Burch of ISU, Michael Roos of EWU, and Jeff Christiansen of EWU.



Post Reply