NAU/MSU predition

Discuss anything and everything relating to Bobcat Football here.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

CaliLumber
New Recruit
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 3:36 pm

NAU/MSU predition

Post by CaliLumber » Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:36 pm

I don't like the looks of this game. NAU was outplayed by PSU for 3 1/2 quarters on Sat. I think we will win on the wings of nothing other then LUCK!

NAU 21, MSU 20



User avatar
CARDIAC_CATS
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7857
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:37 am

Re: NAU/MSU predition

Post by CARDIAC_CATS » Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:39 pm

CaliLumber wrote:I don't like the looks of this game. NAU was outplayed by PSU for 3 1/2 quarters on Sat. I think we will win on the wings of nothing other then LUCK!

NAU 21, MSU 20
Yeah, PSU is interesting ... really big/physical team, but can't go the full game like that. Was the same way against the Bobcats as well. So I will say that both OL/DL for both teams this week match up well with each other and the team with the MOST Turnovers or special teams scores wins this one. Its gonna be a good one. And I HOPE it better be on in Billings here as I heard last weeks wasn't on? Omega is complaining about not being able to carry some games (i.e. ALtitude), but yet they can't carry a game they had on the schedule? I don't get it?



User avatar
Cat-theotherwhitemeat
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3156
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 5:45 pm
Location: Billings
Contact:

Post by Cat-theotherwhitemeat » Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:40 pm

ooooooh, this is a tough game to predict. I've been picking the Cats in most of their games but this one......hmmmmmm

**please hold**


My avatar does not now, nor has in the past, depict a person of mentally challenged state. If you have a problem with it, please call the U.S. department of Bite my A$$. MTBuff/Administrator.

User avatar
lifeloyalsigmsu
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1382
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:50 pm

Post by lifeloyalsigmsu » Mon Oct 25, 2004 1:42 pm

Well what worries me is the fact that we haven't won in Flagstaff since '79. As an optimist, I'd like to go out on a limb and predict a change in that trend.

Of course, a full 4 quarters of football will be needed this time around. If we can't get our heads together in the first 2 quarters, I don't see Lulay and company pulling out any heroics this time.

Despite the losing streak at NAU, I'm going to, of course, go with the Cats. It's going to be a shootout in my opinion.

41-37 Cats!!!


"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." --Thomas Reed

User avatar
kmax
Site Admin
Posts: 9780
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 6:23 pm
Location: Belgrade, MT
Contact:

Post by kmax » Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:23 pm

lifeloyal- Just out of curiosity, what makes you think NAU could hang 37 on the Cats D? Or for that matter(not to be pessimistic or anything) what makes you think the Cats could hang 41 up period?

I think it is going to be a very close one, but I just can't see a high scoring shootout occurring. And I have to echo Cardiac's comments as I will be in Billings this weekend and it better be on.


“Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be—or to be indistinguishable from—self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time.” -- Neal Stephenson, Cryptonomicon

User avatar
CelticCat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 12292
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2004 12:55 pm
Location: Upper Northwest WA
Contact:

Post by CelticCat » Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:24 pm

Stats

Code: Select all

                  MSU          NAU
PF/G              20.9         24.29
PA/G              20.6         21.6
Rushing/G         101.9        124.4
Passing/G         257.4        200.4
Total O/G         359.3        324.4
Rushing D/G       119.9        145.7
Passing D/G       226.4        224.3
Passing Eff D     115.3        131.8    (the lower this number, the better)
Total D/G         346.3        370
Turnover M.       -.43         .57
We are equal or near equal in most categories. Big key will be turnovers. Whoever makes the fewest should win, although we have made a living off of making more turnovers and still winning. But I don't see that happening in NAU.

I believe we can hold the running game, and pressure Murietta. We should be able to walk out of NAU with a win for the first time since what... 76?
Last edited by CelticCat on Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:31 pm, edited 4 times in total.


R&R Cat Cast - the #1 Bobcat fan podcast - https://www.rrcatcast.com
Twitter - https://twitter.com/rrcatcast

User avatar
CARDIAC_CATS
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7857
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:37 am

Post by CARDIAC_CATS » Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:34 pm

I'll make a bland prediction. Whoever has the most TO's or gives up the most big plays will lose this game.

WINNER: 30
LOSER: 20



grizhatr
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 2:50 pm
Location: bozeman

Post by grizhatr » Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:35 pm

1979.



Eastcoastgriz
Member # Retired
Posts: 2151
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 5:43 am
Location: Use to be New Jersey

Post by Eastcoastgriz » Mon Oct 25, 2004 2:45 pm

Good Luck this weekend with NAU.



User avatar
jagur1
Member # Retired
Posts: 2015
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 3:53 pm
Location: Billings

Post by jagur1 » Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:34 pm

Ok I asked this a couple of weeks ago and got no answer

Time of the NAU/cat game? Will it be on Omega?


Never mistake activity for accomplishment.

I'm sick of the man because the man is a thief.

Four

User avatar
CARDIAC_CATS
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7857
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:37 am

Post by CARDIAC_CATS » Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:42 pm

jagur1 wrote:Ok I asked this a couple of weeks ago and got no answer

Time of the NAU/cat game? Will it be on Omega?
7:05 .. SUPPOSSED to be on OMEGA, but we'll see.



velochat
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 447
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:29 am
Location: Bozeman

Post by velochat » Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:49 pm




WYCAT
Member # Retired
Posts: 2828
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 5:19 pm
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Post by WYCAT » Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:22 pm

This is our biggest game yet this season if we want to make a serious run at the post season. We pulled one out in Pocatello that a lot of people thought unlikely and this game has a similar feel going into it. I think we have as good a team as NAU on paper this year especially the way Lulay and Co. are rolling up yardage lately. They defense stepped up big last week (bad SDSU offensive line or better effort???) and must do it again this week. As with most games between evenly matched teams I think this one comes down to turnovers and field position. I think EJ doesn't muff any more punts, kicks better off of the turf, and hold his own in the field position battle. I think our receivers (Sullivan and Gatewood have alternated big weeks - we just need Guinn to make a reappearance) have come back from their first few game funks and are on fire right now. Lulay's confidence and leadership are spilling over to the rest of the team and they are finding ways to win. Maybe not always pretty or deserved but wins the same (reminds me of another MT school). I think they keep the ball out of Domenick's hands quite a bit and Lulay throws 50+ times again. Final score in another close one - Cats 34 Lumberjacks 31.



User avatar
El_Gato
Member # Retired
Posts: 2926
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: Kalispell

Post by El_Gato » Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:34 pm

I love all the optimism and predictions, but our recent history vs NAU mirrors this season:

Dig a big hole early and spend the rest of the game catching up. I know we've "pulled the rabbit out of our hats" this season, as we did last year against NAU in Bozeman.

But I fear if we fall behind by 10+ in the first half this Saturday, our streak of magic will end. I think we MUST be within a score at the half; if so, the long drought at Flagstaff will end; if not, we'll be forced to run the table the rest of the way to win the Sky.

With that said....

HALFTIME SCORE

BOBCATS 10
'Jacks 7


FINAL SCORE

BOBCATS 24
'Jacks 16


Grizzlies: 2-5 when it matters most

User avatar
lifeloyalsigmsu
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1382
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:50 pm

Post by lifeloyalsigmsu » Mon Oct 25, 2004 6:35 pm

kmax wrote:lifeloyal- Just out of curiosity, what makes you think NAU could hang 37 on the Cats D? Or for that matter(not to be pessimistic or anything) what makes you think the Cats could hang 41 up period?

I think it is going to be a very close one, but I just can't see a high scoring shootout occurring. And I have to echo Cardiac's comments as I will be in Billings this weekend and it better be on.
Kmax, NAU has traditionally generally always put up points on us. The offense is starting to take form and our defense hasn't been near as consistent as it was last year. To think we are going to head to Flagstaff and stifle Murrietta and company is ideal, but I don't see it as happening. I see the defense giving up big plays but with the trend the offense has been setting I'm hoping (and, yes, predicting) that they will put up enough to pull out a rare W down there.


"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." --Thomas Reed

User avatar
Helcat72
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4424
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 9:47 pm
Location: Helena

Post by Helcat72 » Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:33 pm

If we put together a whole game offensively and defensively...

Cats 38, Jacks 34

If we play our usual 1/2 game...

Jacks 34, Cats 24


2024 Resume dominance

User avatar
GreatLakesCat
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 6:26 pm
Location: Michigan

Post by GreatLakesCat » Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:00 pm

Here we go...I say it every week, but it IS time the CATS put together one of those perfect feelgood all around football games, which up to this point have eluded us.

Cats- 35
NAU- 17

It is only Monday, so if I have any dreams, odd feelings or preminitions, I'll let everybody know...


If God made me a griz fan...I'd shoot myself...

catsalltheway
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 46
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:54 pm

Post by catsalltheway » Mon Oct 25, 2004 8:17 pm

I think the Bobcats will ROCK the HOUSE!!!!...we will have three great quarters....now come on...we can't have all four yet...let's save that for the Grizz...score.....Bobcats....27 to 14[/b]



raincat
Honorable Mention All-BobcatNation
Posts: 843
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 3:07 pm

Post by raincat » Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:50 pm

This NAU team is hard to get a handle on. They lose to Arizona 21-3 and SF Austin, 24-17. Then the beat Weber 55-27 and SacState 26-0; turn around and get blown out by EWU 45-14. Beat W. New Mex 34-14 and PSU 21-20. If Sac State held them to 26 I'm confident we can too. And, I think if Weber scored 27 on them we can to. So, it's elementary dear Watson (from Sherlock Homes for those of you born after the middle of the last century)...Bobcat 27+, NAU 26-.
Hate to even bring this up..but......I'm wondering with NAU facing going to Missoula next Saturday they might be......well....you know...never mind... . . . . . . . .



velochat
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 447
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:29 am
Location: Bozeman

Post by velochat » Tue Oct 26, 2004 8:02 am

Your analysis doesn't consider where the games were played. Here's the info:

Current / Upcoming Season
Date Opponent Location Time Results
Sep 4 Arizona (FSN Arizona) Tucson, Ariz. 7:00 p.m. L, 21-3
Sep 11 Stephen F. Austin Nacogdoches, Texas 5:05 p.m. L, 24-17 OT
Sep 25 Weber State* Flagstaff, Ariz. 6:05 pm W, 55-27
Oct 2 Sacramento State* (HC) (KAZ-TV) Flagstaff, Ariz. 3:35 p.m. W, 26-0
Oct 9 Eastern Washington* (KAZ-TV) Cheney, Wash. 2:05 p.m. L, 45-14
Oct 16 Western New Mexico Flagstaff, Ariz. 6:05 p.m. W, 34-14
Oct 23 Portland State* (Family Weekend) Flagstaff, Ariz. 3:35 p.m. W, 21-20
Oct 30 Montana State* (KAZ-TV) Flagstaff, Ariz. 6:05 p.m.
Nov 6 Montana* Missoula, Mont. 12:05 p.m.
Nov 13 Idaho State* Pocatello, Idaho 3:05 p.m.
Nov 20 Northern Iowa (Red Ribbon Game) Flagstaff, Ariz. 6:05 p.m.
* - Big Sky Conference game
(HC) - Homecoming
(PW) - Parents' Weekend



Post Reply