US vs Iran

A mellow place for Bobcats to discuss topics free of political posturing

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply
User avatar
briannell
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:49 am
Contact:

US vs Iran

Post by briannell » Sat Aug 13, 2005 11:43 am

Bush hints at using force against Iran
President says 'all options are on the table' to get Tehran to give up nukes

Updated: 1:35 p.m. ET Aug. 13, 2005
JERUSALEM - In a stern warning to Iran, President Bush said “all options are on the table” if the Iranians refuse to comply with international demands to halt their nuclear program, pointedly noting he has already used force to protect U.S. security.

Bush’s statement during an interview on Israeli TV late Friday was unusually harsh. He previously said diplomacy should be used to persuade Iran to suspend its nuclear program and if that failed then the U.N. Security Council should impose sanctions.

The U.S. government and others fear Iran’s nuclear work is secretly designed to produce nuclear weapons. Iran’s leaders deny that, saying it is only for the generation of electricity.


In the interview, Bush said the United States and Israel “are united in our objective to make sure that Iran does not have a weapon.”

But, he said, if diplomacy fails “all options are on the table.”

“The use of force is the last option for any president. You know, we’ve used force in the recent past to secure our country,” he said.

Iran’s government resumed uranium conversion at its nuclear facility in Isfahan this past week. The U.N. nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency, responded by issuing a warning to Iran on Thursday that expressed “serious concern” about Iran’s intentions.

Bush welcomed the warning, which signaled that the West wanted to give diplomacy time to ease the standoff.

In Vienna, Austria, where the IAEA is based, diplomats said Iran faced a Sept. 3 deadline to stop uranium conversion or face possible referral to the Security Council, which has the power to impose crippling sanctions. The diplomats spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the IAEA board’s proceedings.

Iran, which insists its nuclear program is peaceful, responded with indignation to the IAEA warning.

© 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Rate this story Low


Rebecca
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Please donate to PEDS cancer research-
a cure is just around the bend

support mastiff rescue
www.mastiff.org

User avatar
Hell's Bells
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4692
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:58 pm
Location: Belgrade, Mt.
Contact:

Post by Hell's Bells » Sat Aug 13, 2005 2:09 pm

good outlaw nation with nukes = disaster


This space for rent....

User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 24000
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Re: US vs Iran

Post by SonomaCat » Sun Aug 14, 2005 7:12 pm

briannell wrote:“The use of force is the last option for any president. You know, we’ve used force in the recent past to secure our country,” he said.
This line kind of reminds me of something from Bull Durham. Do you suppose we just invaded Iraq akin to Crash telling Meat to hit the mascot, even when he had the control to not do so? Do we now have the whole world off-balance since we have that crazy look in our eyes that says, "Yes, we are just wild enough that we might bean you in the head with our next pitch."

It's one form of foreign policy. Time will tell is it's the right one.



Post Reply