Page 1 of 1

Bush decline and its effect

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 4:01 pm
by iaafan
George Bush's poll numbers are in decline because the Iraq war hangs around his neck like a two-ton albatross.

The latest AP-Ipsos poll puts approval for Bush's handling of the war at only 38 percent and his overall job approval at only 42 percent. (In addition, 50 percent of the country says he is dishonest and only 48 percent says he is honest.)

Since Bush doesn't have to run for office again, you might wonder why this matters. There are at least two reasons:

Republicans in Congress have to run for re-election next year; these figures terrify them. The numbers are getting so bad that some are already wondering whether a campaign visit by the president would be a plus or a minus in their districts.

One reason the administration is now talking about a pull-down of troops in Iraq next year is that congressional Republicans are virtually demanding a return of some U.S. troops before Election Day. And the Republican Party does not want to even think about trying to run a presidential campaign in 2008 if large numbers of U.S. troops are still fighting and dying in Iraq.

The best thing the Republicans have going for them, in fact, is that the Democrats are not offering many solutions. Most Democrats just parrot what the White House is saying: We must stay the course in Iraq. It's not over until it's over. We will have accomplished our mission when our mission is accomplished.

For voters this is not a choice, but an echo.

The other reason that Bush is upset with the polls numbers is that they show his political capital now running a deficit.

Those who hailed Bush's recent legislative "triumphs"--the energy bill, the highway bill, and CAFTA--overlook political reality. In the real America, you can't find a hundred people who know anything about the energy bill, highway bill, or CAFTA.

Average Americans--and this is due in large part to a ferocious publicity campaign by the White House--are familiar with only one legislative initiative: Social Security. And whatever happened to George Bush's plans to privatize it?

Gone and buried--along with his high poll numbers.

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:03 pm
by Bleedinbluengold
Indeed! - Better for him just keep a low profile.

Better for us if the Republicans wring their hands, and the Dems wander aimlessly...no legislation is good legislation.

Wait 'til you see his numbers when oil hits $100, and gas is $3.

Who's working on that perpetual motion machine?

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:49 pm
by iaafan
Wait til you see his wallet after oil hits $100 and $3. We'll have to wait until he leaves office first, but it'll be a sight. He'll throw down his religious ways and cruise the drag in Vegas in a Rhino with Britney Spears or that gay manwhore guy that was sneaking into the press conferences. Comp tix to Ziegfeld and Roy. :P

Re: Bush decline and its effect

Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 10:07 pm
by El_Gato
iaafan wrote:...The other reason that Bush is upset with the polls numbers...
I'm sorry, iaa, but I see NOTHING in W's words or actions that even HINTS that he gives a rat's arse about his poll #'s.

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:22 am
by raincat
The perpetual motion machine is almost here. google "Saddle Rock Technology". I can't bring up the link. Very exciting stuff. Let's see how big oil puts the Ki Bosh on this.

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:44 am
by Bleedinbluengold
Fascinating.

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 11:53 am
by SonomaCat
raincat wrote:The perpetual motion machine is almost here. google "Saddle Rock Technology". I can't bring up the link. Very exciting stuff. Let's see how big oil puts the Ki Bosh on this.
Either Big Oil has already gotten to Google, I am experiencing some severe user error, or I missed a joke, because I'm not finding anything on-point. If anyone comes across a link, can they post it? Thanks.

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:00 pm
by raincat

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:01 pm
by SonomaCat
Thanks, raincat! I don't know why I couldn't find these sites.

It does all sound very, very interesting. I'm just a little disappointed that the most recent news article on their page is over a year old. I hope that doesn't mean that they have run into problems in their progress on the design or in bringing the technology to market. Maybe that is just evidence that their focus is on the technology right now as opposed to the marketing -- if they have lined up the necessary investors, then the marketing side is irrelevent until they go to market with the engine.

Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 12:02 pm
by raincat
Hey...it came up. See both above.