Fall enrollment 2023 record
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2023 5:08 pm
16,978
I remember Dave Lageson in Earth Sciences.wbtfg wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 9:40 amIn addition to record enrollment, it looks like we just had 6 new building projects approved (https://www.bozemandailychronicle.com/n ... b5744.html).
As bad as that is, Missoula is really pathetic (31%/48%).coloradocat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 12:59 pmWould be great if we could get more of these students graduated. Under 38% graduate from a 4-year program in four years and less than 60% get it done in six. But hey, at least the university will get more of that sweet out-of-state cash!
Yep. Far too many kids are shamed into attending college. Shame on our elitist educators...coloradocat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:17 pmOpen enrollment has historically been the excuse for poor results but Montana's policy isn't unique and other states have better outcomes.
I've ranted about the Schooling Industrial Complex, of which universities are only one part, many times so I won't go any further down that rabbit hole. But I'll just say that high enrollment in a vacuum is not something to celebrate.
Elitist educators?grizzh8r wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:24 pmYep. Far too many kids are shamed into attending college. Shame on our elitist educators...coloradocat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:17 pmOpen enrollment has historically been the excuse for poor results but Montana's policy isn't unique and other states have better outcomes.
I've ranted about the Schooling Industrial Complex, of which universities are only one part, many times so I won't go any further down that rabbit hole. But I'll just say that high enrollment in a vacuum is not something to celebrate.
I'm assuming sarcasm but it really is all part of the system. Most teachers from the late-70s to mid-00s were baby boomers who grew up in an age when the choices were: struggle with a factory/farm life or go to college and move up in society. That led to "everyone has to go to college". When you combine that attitude among society in general and the dumbing down of K-12 education, you get sub-40% graduation rates.wbtfg wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:35 pmElitist educators?grizzh8r wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:24 pmYep. Far too many kids are shamed into attending college. Shame on our elitist educators...coloradocat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:17 pmOpen enrollment has historically been the excuse for poor results but Montana's policy isn't unique and other states have better outcomes.
I've ranted about the Schooling Industrial Complex, of which universities are only one part, many times so I won't go any further down that rabbit hole. But I'll just say that high enrollment in a vacuum is not something to celebrate.
Montana is desperately in need of a shift in perception away from "Bobcats or Griz" as the only two college options in the state. A lot of these kids who go to Bozeman or Missoula and flunk out would be far better served to go to a two-year college and study in a trades or workforce program that will get them into a high-paying career in less time and without the four-year debt.coloradocat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:08 pmI'm assuming sarcasm but it really is all part of the system. Most teachers from the late-70s to mid-00s were baby boomers who grew up in an age when the choices were: struggle with a factory/farm life or go to college and move up in society. That led to "everyone has to go to college". When you combine that attitude among society in general and the dumbing down of K-12 education, you get sub-40% graduation rates.wbtfg wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:35 pmElitist educators?grizzh8r wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:24 pmYep. Far too many kids are shamed into attending college. Shame on our elitist educators...coloradocat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:17 pmOpen enrollment has historically been the excuse for poor results but Montana's policy isn't unique and other states have better outcomes.
I've ranted about the Schooling Industrial Complex, of which universities are only one part, many times so I won't go any further down that rabbit hole. But I'll just say that high enrollment in a vacuum is not something to celebrate.
MSU01 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 7:56 pmMontana is desperately in need of a shift in perception away from "Bobcats or Griz" as the only two college options in the state. A lot of these kids who go to Bozeman or Missoula and flunk out would be far better served to go to a two-year college and study in a trades or workforce program that will get them into a high-paying career in less time and without the four-year debt.coloradocat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:08 pmI'm assuming sarcasm but it really is all part of the system. Most teachers from the late-70s to mid-00s were baby boomers who grew up in an age when the choices were: struggle with a factory/farm life or go to college and move up in society. That led to "everyone has to go to college". When you combine that attitude among society in general and the dumbing down of K-12 education, you get sub-40% graduation rates.wbtfg wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:35 pmElitist educators?grizzh8r wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:24 pmYep. Far too many kids are shamed into attending college. Shame on our elitist educators...coloradocat wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 2:17 pmOpen enrollment has historically been the excuse for poor results but Montana's policy isn't unique and other states have better outcomes.
I've ranted about the Schooling Industrial Complex, of which universities are only one part, many times so I won't go any further down that rabbit hole. But I'll just say that high enrollment in a vacuum is not something to celebrate.
Thanks for posting, and I think you're right on. In addition, it looks like their freshman class increased by 22 students for a total of 1373.Cataholic wrote: ↑Mon Sep 25, 2023 1:25 pmUM released their fall enrollment today.
https://www.umt.edu/news/2023/09/092523enrl.php
Based on the article, it appears that they had some nice growth. I looked for data though and it was not part of the news release. The link they provide for the data does not work. It caused me to look a little closer and they still have growth issues.
They claim an increase of 372 students for a growth rate of 3.7%. The article then touts the growth at Missoula College as part of the increase with an increase of 221 students. (It should be noted that 201 of this increase is dual enrollment high school students). That means the main campus actually only increased 151 students. Yikes! They also mention growth for their graduate degrees of roughly 69. Taking away the graduate students, their main campus only increased by 82 students.
Exactly. I have heard UM alum criticize MSU for having so many out of state students. Considering that the out of state student pay double the amount in tuition and have the highest profit margin, they are the most sought after students. Leave it up to a UM grad to not figure that out.
How much has MSU shifted to being a part-time school? With population growth in the area, have more people moved in, gotten a job, then started their post-secondary education part time? That might explain a bit of the 6-year rate not moving as much as the 4-year rate.