Conrad Burns one of Time's worst five

A mellow place for Bobcats to discuss topics free of political posturing

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

crazycat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4432
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 6:03 pm

Conrad Burns one of Time's worst five

Post by crazycat » Mon Apr 17, 2006 3:57 pm

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... 28,00.html

"I'm gonna go get knee walkin' drunk!"


Montana Grizzly Football: A Century of Dominance! tampagriz says: crazycat may be completely insane but he's got guts. And guts are enough.
tampapig said: Females have one function in my world.

mslacat
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6154
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:12 am
Contact:

Re: Conrad Burns one of Time's worst five

Post by mslacat » Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:32 pm

crazycat wrote:http://www.time.com/time/magazine/artic ... 28,00.html

"I'm gonna go get knee walkin' drunk!"
And yet he will be re-elected.
It is always the other guy's senator that is crooked!


You elected a ****** RAPIST to be our President

User avatar
catamaran
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3802
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by catamaran » Mon Apr 17, 2006 4:40 pm

Conrad sealed my opinion of him right before the first time I could vote. In front of a class of high school seniors he triumphantly proclaims....."Education isn't always important. Heck I barely graduated from high school and now I'm a U. S. Senator". 'Nuff said.


if you're keeping score, France gave us Burgundy wine, cigarettes, berets, B.O., brie and the Napoleon complex-Bill Simmons

iaafan
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7803
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 12:44 pm

Post by iaafan » Mon Apr 17, 2006 6:33 pm

Heck, I'm surprised he even said it "isn't always important." Shoot, the way I figure it, he's prolly said, "Edge-a-kashun ain't 'portant a-tall" a time 'er two. All ya need is the three Rs -- Redneck, Racist and Republican.

Oh now look what I've gone and done, got all them ripoffleggins all fired up. Heh-heh. C'mon, you guys kin take a joke cain't ya? :lol:



PortlandCat
BobcatNation Redshirt
Posts: 79
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 4:39 pm
Location: Portland

Post by PortlandCat » Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:52 pm

His first campaign slogan was "you bet" which I and everyone I knew thought was stupid. I was so shocked he was elected. The guy is an idiot and always has been.

I heard his new slogan was "git er done"



User avatar
lifeloyalsigmsu
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1382
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2004 9:50 pm

Post by lifeloyalsigmsu » Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:25 am

iaafan wrote:Heck, I'm surprised he even said it "isn't always important." Shoot, the way I figure it, he's prolly said, "Edge-a-kashun ain't 'portant a-tall" a time 'er two. All ya need is the three Rs -- Redneck, Racist and Republican.

Oh now look what I've gone and done, got all them ripoffleggins all fired up. Heh-heh. C'mon, you guys kin take a joke cain't ya? :lol:
Spoken like a truly elitist liberal! ;)


"One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." --Thomas Reed

User avatar
G.W.Bush
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 539
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 8:33 am

Post by G.W.Bush » Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:07 am

After reading about the other 4 Senators that made the list one thing stuck out in my mind, Conrad was the only one that "might have" broken the law.



User avatar
Ponycat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1885
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 3:52 pm

Post by Ponycat » Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:13 am

To get on Conrad over his possible ties to the Abramoff scandal is understandable but to say that his legislative record is "meagher" is foolish and flat wrong.


The devil made me do it the first time... the second time I done it on my own.

User avatar
Hell's Bells
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4699
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:58 pm
Location: Belgrade, Mt.
Contact:

Post by Hell's Bells » Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:57 am

and yet Teddy "buy me a drink and a babe" Kennedy was one of the best senators....are you kidding me?? lol


This space for rent....

User avatar
catamaran
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3802
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by catamaran » Tue Apr 18, 2006 9:59 am

Kind of off topic but that reminds me of a funny bumper sticker I saw yesterday. "I'd rather go hunting with Dick Chaney than take a leisurly drive with Ted Kennedy" Hilarious


if you're keeping score, France gave us Burgundy wine, cigarettes, berets, B.O., brie and the Napoleon complex-Bill Simmons

User avatar
Hell's Bells
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4699
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:58 pm
Location: Belgrade, Mt.
Contact:

Post by Hell's Bells » Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:01 am

catamaran wrote:Kind of off topic but that reminds me of a funny bumper sticker I saw yesterday. "I'd rather go hunting with Dick Chaney than take a leisurly drive with Ted Kennedy" Hilarious
funny why should we take seriously a list of senators that are good if one of them has a nic "turban durban"


This space for rent....

User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 24005
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Post by SonomaCat » Tue Apr 18, 2006 10:02 am

Hell's Bells wrote:and yet Teddy "buy me a drink and a babe" Kennedy was one of the best senators....are you kidding me?? lol
What arguments do you have to suggest that he is not a good Senator? (Outside of referencing an accident from 30 years ago)



User avatar
RyeCat
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2005 8:17 am
Location: Bozeman
Contact:

Post by RyeCat » Tue Apr 18, 2006 11:23 am

My friend, whom I know is very intelligent and I respect highly, works in Conrad's D.C. office. In the past, she has asked that we vote for Conrad so that she can keep her job. As much as I like her and value her friendshp, I haven't been able to do it. He's an embarrassing hayseed.



User avatar
PapaG
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9164
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:44 am
Location: The Magic City, MT

Post by PapaG » Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:24 pm

Bay Area Cat wrote:
Hell's Bells wrote:and yet Teddy "buy me a drink and a babe" Kennedy was one of the best senators....are you kidding me?? lol
What arguments do you have to suggest that he is not a good Senator? (Outside of referencing an accident from 30 years ago)
Well, if bringing home the bacon is one of the criteria, it's hard to argue against Ted being in the Top 10 Best.

The Big Dig alone places him in this category. What's the new slogan on that one? "Over $14.6 billion served to local Massachusetts businesses"? The great thing is they still aren't done with it.

Yeah, that Ted. Fighting for the little guy. ;)



User avatar
Hell's Bells
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4699
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 11:58 pm
Location: Belgrade, Mt.
Contact:

Post by Hell's Bells » Wed Apr 19, 2006 12:35 pm

PapaG wrote:
Bay Area Cat wrote:
Hell's Bells wrote:and yet Teddy "buy me a drink and a babe" Kennedy was one of the best senators....are you kidding me?? lol
What arguments do you have to suggest that he is not a good Senator? (Outside of referencing an accident from 30 years ago)
Well, if bringing home the bacon is one of the criteria, it's hard to argue against Ted being in the Top 10 Best.

The Big Dig alone places him in this category. What's the new slogan on that one? "Over $14.6 billion served to local Massachusetts businesses"? The great thing is they still aren't done with it.

Yeah, that Ted. Fighting for the little guy. ;)
so we should not vote for conrad because he is a "embarassing hayseed"?
isnt that a little bigoted? seriously? :wink:


This space for rent....

User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 24005
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Post by SonomaCat » Wed Apr 19, 2006 1:58 pm

Hell's Bells wrote:
PapaG wrote:
Bay Area Cat wrote:
Hell's Bells wrote:and yet Teddy "buy me a drink and a babe" Kennedy was one of the best senators....are you kidding me?? lol
What arguments do you have to suggest that he is not a good Senator? (Outside of referencing an accident from 30 years ago)
Well, if bringing home the bacon is one of the criteria, it's hard to argue against Ted being in the Top 10 Best.

The Big Dig alone places him in this category. What's the new slogan on that one? "Over $14.6 billion served to local Massachusetts businesses"? The great thing is they still aren't done with it.

Yeah, that Ted. Fighting for the little guy. ;)
so we should not vote for conrad because he is a "embarassing hayseed"?
isnt that a little bigoted? seriously? :wink:
I'm not sure "embarassing hayseeds" are a protected class of people (to use HR-speak). It's like accusing someone of being a pompous elitist. You can be discriminating (literally, and not in the negative way) in your views and not care for people with those traits (and choose to not vote for a person with those traits to represent your state), but it's certainly not bigoted to hold such an opinion.

In other words, it's not the same as using an ethnic slur (which, incidentally, is one of the identifiers of an embarassing hayseed) ... it's closer to calling someone "dumb."



Grizlaw
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Floral Park, NY

Post by Grizlaw » Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:33 pm

Ponycat wrote:To get on Conrad over his possible ties to the Abramoff scandal is understandable but to say that his legislative record is "meagher" is foolish and flat wrong.
Is it? What was the last bill of significance that Burns sponsored? What was the last major bill on which he was a key player in reaching a compromise?

The thing about Burns is that, whenever his supporters are questioned about his record, they always point to the amount of money he has brought to the state of Montana. That's fine; as a Montanan, I like to see federal dollars flowing to Montana, but you must realize that alone does not make a noteworthy legislative record. He may be doing a good job of doing what his constituents want, but he's certainly not a mover/shaker on the national level. (It is also a bit ironic that a lot of the same people who praise Burns for bringing money to Montana are also the same people who criticize other states' Senators for bringing "pork" to their states, but that's another matter.)

Bottom line: Burns is a solid, "yes-Republican," and I do agree with him on a lot of issues, but I don't think it's unfair to say that his legislative record is less than spectacular.

--GL


I work as an attorney so that I can afford good scotch, which helps me to forget that I work as an attorney.

User avatar
Ponycat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1885
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 3:52 pm

Post by Ponycat » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:24 pm

Grizlaw wrote:
Ponycat wrote:To get on Conrad over his possible ties to the Abramoff scandal is understandable but to say that his legislative record is "meagher" is foolish and flat wrong.
Is it? What was the last bill of significance that Burns sponsored? What was the last major bill on which he was a key player in reaching a compromise?

The thing about Burns is that, whenever his supporters are questioned about his record, they always point to the amount of money he has brought to the state of Montana. That's fine; as a Montanan, I like to see federal dollars flowing to Montana, but you must realize that alone does not make a noteworthy legislative record. He may be doing a good job of doing what his constituents want, but he's certainly not a mover/shaker on the national level. (It is also a bit ironic that a lot of the same people who praise Burns for bringing money to Montana are also the same people who criticize other states' Senators for bringing "pork" to their states, but that's another matter.)

Bottom line: Burns is a solid, "yes-Republican," and I do agree with him on a lot of issues, but I don't think it's unfair to say that his legislative record is less than spectacular.

--GL
Take a look at any of major telecommunications and telemedicine bills and you will see that Conrad is a "mover/shaker" Conrad has been at the forefront of telecommunications, particulary the internet since he has been in the Senate. You don't get called the "Father of the Internet" by Yahoo for simply bringing home the pork. A couple of examples would his work on making the cyperspace more secure (tech 7, I think, and e-Eleven) he also helped author the Telecommunications Act (not sure what year), and the CAN SPAM Bill

And yes most of Conrad's bill's have to do with money because he is on the Appropriations committee...oh the horror and the money he has gotten our universities are because of his seat on the Commerce, Science, and Transportation committee. God forbid if he makes sure money earmarked for research and development is given to Montanans for research and development.

His work on COOL legislation, keeping International Markets open for American beef, his help for Small business, Veterans, and Asbestosis victims plus his pushing to split the 9th Circuit, might be issues that are a little too local for TIME Magazine but are major reasons I'm a huge fan of Conrad.


The devil made me do it the first time... the second time I done it on my own.

User avatar
HelenaCat95
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6978
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Helena, Montana

Post by HelenaCat95 » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:40 pm

Ponycat wrote:
Grizlaw wrote:
Ponycat wrote:To get on Conrad over his possible ties to the Abramoff scandal is understandable but to say that his legislative record is "meagher" is foolish and flat wrong.
Is it? What was the last bill of significance that Burns sponsored? What was the last major bill on which he was a key player in reaching a compromise?

The thing about Burns is that, whenever his supporters are questioned about his record, they always point to the amount of money he has brought to the state of Montana. That's fine; as a Montanan, I like to see federal dollars flowing to Montana, but you must realize that alone does not make a noteworthy legislative record. He may be doing a good job of doing what his constituents want, but he's certainly not a mover/shaker on the national level. (It is also a bit ironic that a lot of the same people who praise Burns for bringing money to Montana are also the same people who criticize other states' Senators for bringing "pork" to their states, but that's another matter.)

Bottom line: Burns is a solid, "yes-Republican," and I do agree with him on a lot of issues, but I don't think it's unfair to say that his legislative record is less than spectacular.

--GL
Take a look at any of major telecommunications and telemedicine bills and you will see that Conrad is a "mover/shaker" Conrad has been at the forefront of telecommunications, particulary the internet since he has been in the Senate. You don't get called the "Father of the Internet" by Yahoo for simply bringing home the pork. A couple of examples would his work on making the cyperspace more secure (tech 7, I think, and e-Eleven) he also helped author the Telecommunications Act (not sure what year), and the CAN SPAM Bill

And yes most of Conrad's bill's have to do with money because he is on the Appropriations committee...oh the horror and the money he has gotten our universities are because of his seat on the Commerce, Science, and Transportation committee. God forbid if he makes sure money earmarked for research and development is given to Montanans for research and development.

His work on COOL legislation, keeping International Markets open for American beef, his help for Small business, Veterans, and Asbestosis victims plus his pushing to split the 9th Circuit, might be issues that are a little too local for TIME Magazine but are major reasons I'm a huge fan of Conrad.


=D^ =D^



Ponycat...call me on cell when you get a chance.



Grizlaw
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3305
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 2:04 pm
Location: Floral Park, NY

Post by Grizlaw » Wed Apr 19, 2006 3:50 pm

Ponycat wrote:Take a look at any of major telecommunications and telemedicine bills and you will see that Conrad is a "mover/shaker" Conrad has been at the forefront of telecommunications, particulary the internet since he has been in the Senate.
You're correct; he is something of a leader in the technology arena. I had forgotten about that aspect of his record when I posted.

I guess my point is, the guy has been in the Senate for 18 years now, and considering his level of seniority, it doesn't seem to me like he's accomplished that much from a leadership perspective (and I'm not saying he hasn't accomplished much in other ways; he has...but since we're talking about his legislative record here, I'm just looking at areas where he has been instrumental in getting bills drafted and passed -- the fact is, there aren't many, considering how long he's been around).

I don't deny that he's done some good things, (particularly for Montana), but on most issues he does tend to be more of a follower than a leader. Coupled with the fact that a lot of what Burns does accomplish would be considered "pork" to the rest of the country, it doesn't shock me that much that Time would label his record as "meager."


I work as an attorney so that I can afford good scotch, which helps me to forget that I work as an attorney.

Post Reply