Smack like question....

Topher · Post by **Topher** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:10 pm

Question:

How big of an impact does Lulay have on this game? (The one who graduated last year)

tdub · Post by **tdub** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:27 pm

HUGE. Those scrambles of Rolovich's would have been first downs, and not 3 yard gains. In a game as close as that one, a few first downs strung together could swing the whole game.

1BadBobcat · Post by **1BadBobcat** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:55 pm

No question about it. Lulay's running ability forced opposing linebackers to stay home and many times he was even touched until he was seven yards downfield.

fredito · Post by **fredito** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:30 pm

I agree with the above posts....Lulay was a great QB and could threaten the line with a rush....the oppositon had to a passer and a great runner

BobcatOninetails · Post by **BobcatOninetails** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:54 pm

Topher wrote:Question:

How big of an impact does Lulay have on this game? (The one who graduated last year)

Lulat is GONE! Bailey hasn't figured that out yet. I will personally help him pack for the move. Our offense has eaked out all season when we should have put teams away. His second half coaching is more than terrible. Lets all get over Lulay and try to find someone more predictable than Mr. Rogers. Bailey Sucks and there is no arguing about it. Third and one from the shotgun? Complete idiocy. The kids on the field deserve better than that. Goldie Hawn in "Wildcats" knows more about football than this clown.

DCC2MSU · Post by **DCC2MSU** » Sat Nov 18, 2006 11:32 pm

There's also the obvious upgrade to our punting game.

GrizinWashington · Post by **GrizinWashington** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 2:05 am

DCC2MSU wrote:There's also the obvious upgrade to our punting game.

Your punt team is...well, in a word, horrible.

Cledus · Post by **Cledus** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:31 am

GrizinWashington wrote:Your punt team is...well, in a word, horrible.

It was for a better part of the season, but it made improvements as the season progressed. The punt team consists of more than just the punter. The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.

Topher · Post by **Topher** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:36 pm

Cledus wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Your punt team is...well, in a word, horrible.
It was for a better part of the season, but it made improvements as the season progressed. The punt team consists of more than just the punter. The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.

uuuuuuh, it's not like Tuff needed to get a whole lot of yards after receiving the ball on his own/or the Cats 45. It would have been greedy to expect more from punt return than what your special teams already gift wrapped.

So to your envious dig on our top notch punt returner I say thaaaank you.

Htowngriz · Post by **Htowngriz** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:26 pm

Cledus wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Your punt team is...well, in a word, horrible.
It was for a better part of the season, but it made improvements as the season progressed. The punt team consists of more than just the punter. The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.

Is that the only positive thing you can say about your team's performance? Pretty sad

Post by **SonomaCat** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:42 pm

Htowngriz wrote:
Cledus wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Your punt team is...well, in a word, horrible.
It was for a better part of the season, but it made improvements as the season progressed. The punt team consists of more than just the punter. The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.
Is that the only positive thing you can say about your team's performance? Pretty sad

At the expense of pointing out the obvious ... he didn't say that was the only positive thing that he could say about the team's performance.

Grizlaw · Post by **Grizlaw** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:52 pm

Cledus wrote:The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.

To be fair, though, they were also kicking away from Harris for most of the day, right? I'll grant you that the Cats did do a good job of containing him on the few punts that he did return, but they clearly feared him as a returner.

Cledus · Post by **Cledus** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:59 pm

Htowngriz wrote:Is that the only positive thing you can say about your team's performance? Pretty sad

I could say how the Jizz got stuffed on 4th and 1 to end the half. Couldn't even move the ball three feet. Would that work for you?

Htowngriz · Post by **Htowngriz** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:00 pm

Bay Area Cat wrote:
Htowngriz wrote:
Cledus wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Your punt team is...well, in a word, horrible.
It was for a better part of the season, but it made improvements as the season progressed. The punt team consists of more than just the punter. The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.
Is that the only positive thing you can say about your team's performance? Pretty sad
At the expense of pointing out the obvious ... he didn't say that was the only positive thing that he could say about the team's performance.

I haven't read much else that was positive, other than how the cats were gifted a playoff berth

Htowngriz · Post by **Htowngriz** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:01 pm

Bay Area Cat wrote:
Htowngriz wrote:
Cledus wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Your punt team is...well, in a word, horrible.
It was for a better part of the season, but it made improvements as the season progressed. The punt team consists of more than just the punter. The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.
Is that the only positive thing you can say about your team's performance? Pretty sad
At the expense of pointing out the obvious ... he didn't say that was the only positive thing that he could say about the team's performance.

I haven't read much else that was positive, other than how the cats were gifted a playoff berth

Post by **SonomaCat** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:02 pm

Grizlaw wrote:
Cledus wrote:The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.
To be fair, though, they were also kicking away from Harris for most of the day, right? I'll grant you that the Cats did do a good job of containing him on the few punts that he did return, but they clearly feared him as a returner.

In all honesty, that's how they have punted all year. Every punt has the intent of kicking away from the returner.

I'm sure they respected Tuff as a returner, but they weren't doing anything special for him that they didn't do all year long (except they didn't hand any easy blocked punts to the Griz, which they did often do for other teams).

anacondagriz · Post by **anacondagriz** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:04 pm

Cledus wrote:
Htowngriz wrote:Is that the only positive thing you can say about your team's performance? Pretty sad
I could say how the Jizz got stuffed on 4th and 1 to end the half. Couldn't even move the ball three feet. Would that work for you?

Did you guys get stuffed on 4th & 1 also?

Post by **SonomaCat** » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:05 pm

Htowngriz wrote:
Bay Area Cat wrote:
Htowngriz wrote:
Cledus wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Your punt team is...well, in a word, horrible.
It was for a better part of the season, but it made improvements as the season progressed. The punt team consists of more than just the punter. The coverage bitch-smacked "Tuff" Harris all day.
Is that the only positive thing you can say about your team's performance? Pretty sad
At the expense of pointing out the obvious ... he didn't say that was the only positive thing that he could say about the team's performance.
I haven't read much else that was positive, other than how the cats were gifted a playoff berth

If you watched the game, you probably saw about as many positives for MSU as UM ... mostly on defense for both.

But the Griz won the game.

And now we have a new season.

Sorry for deflating your smack. I hope you weren't hoping for too much joy from it.

Htowngriz · Post by **Htowngriz** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:16 am

Cledus wrote:
Htowngriz wrote:Is that the only positive thing you can say about your team's performance? Pretty sad
I could say how the Jizz got stuffed on 4th and 1 to end the half. Couldn't even move the ball three feet. Would that work for you?

Seems like we moved the ball 54 yards on one play, and that was enough to beat the scats; and if by "Jizz" you mean that hit on Jefferson, then that would be correct.

Grizomatic · Post by **Grizomatic** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:00 am

Cledus wrote:
Htowngriz wrote:
I could say how the Jizz got stuffed on 4th and 1 to end the half. Couldn't even move the ball three feet. Would that work for you?

No it doesn't, but 13-7 does.

Smack like question....

Smack like question....

Re: Smack like question....