Oops, my bad, CC. It was actually catatac that posted that, not you. It's on page 11, I believe. Sorry.crazycat wrote:I'm sure you're probably right, but can you direct me to where I said that. Just give me the page number and I'll look it up. I could only find two instances that allude to using Google and neither mentions Hauck. Maybe there's a third and not seeing it.GrizinWashington wrote:crazycat wrote:I think I said if you Google "Neuheisal + recruiting violations" all kinds of things come up. I also said to Google 'football recruiting violations' but I don't recall saying to Google "hauck recruiting violations". Maybe I did, but of late I've been trying to leave Hauck's name out whenever possible.GrizinWashington wrote:Bobby was already at Montana when the betting pool issue ocurred at Washington. He had no more part in that than you or I did.catatac wrote:Yep, I did leave out that last part, knowing that you guys would be sure to fill it in!I also said that these weren't huge deals in my opinion. Neither is the betting pool violation that Bobby was involved with that I didn't mention. None of this, though... explains how in the world these were the first 3 things at the top of my Google list... yet somehow "the first 30ish" articles that came up in your list supposedly didn't mention any of these things. You are going to www.google.com rather than www.google.org... correct?
Anyway, I am all for morphing this thread into Hotties...
And my post said that in 6 pages I could not find any recruiting violations. That was in reply to cc's contention that if you google BH and recruiting violations, all sorts of things came up. I simply posted I didn't find an article that shows he has committed anything beyond the 1-day quiet call, and that was Nieuheisal's issue, not BH's.You said Hauck. Perhaps you meant Slick Rick.if you Google "Bobby Hauck Recruiting Violations
As for the betting pool, we are both correct. The pool you're refering to is the $5 NCAA BB bracket the coaching staff participated in after the UW compliance officer wrote the now-infamous memo stating it was acceptable. The pool that really got Slick Rick in trouble was a Monte Carlo style betting pool that took place in his snobby neighborhood, and which did not involve any others from the athletic dept, and which was NOT a $5 pool (Rick won it and I believe collected a couple grand in the deal). But I agree with you the small bracket pool was certainly not an issue (although technically against the rules, no matter what the compliance officer stated).
And JDoub! UDAMAN!!!
