94VegasCat wrote:In this century, have any conference teams beat the griz as many times as the CATS?
My money is firmly on:NO


Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
The Griz have been dominant and if we can just be nearly as dominant, I'd be very happy. Having won 3 of the last 6, we're getting there in that department. We just need another set of sky boxes, another 5,000 seats, a decent parking lot, and playoff appearances almost every year.GrizinWashington wrote:I agree. That is a damn good post. It really highlights just how dominant the Griz have been.grizzh8r wrote:94VegasCat wrote:In this century, have any conference teams beat the griz as many times as the CATS?
My money is firmly on:NO![]()
I'll beat the Griz posters to the punch and just say that UM went deep into the playoffs in 2006 reaching the semis. I figure you'd rather hear from me than them.LuvDaCats wrote:Boy how times change... Seems just a few short years ago Griz fans weren't so concerned with the Cat/Griz game because they were always playing in the post season, deep into the post season as it was always refered. Now with the last 2 seasons ending in the shallow post season seems the conf. record and Cat/Griz outcome are more talking points than they used to be. Hmmmmm
WHAT??? You got to get off the coolaid you're drinking. Sober up and then post again.Cat Grad wrote: The fairweatherfans who were a part of the 95 and 01 "even a blind pig finds and acorn once in a great while" feel-good-about-themselves somehow construe making the podunk playoffs every year in the only show in town atmosphere a testimony to their self-professed "great program." Yeah, everybody in the state heads for a 25k stadium!
Uhh, wut?Cat Grad wrote:Actually, DumB hasn't slipped, per se. The fairweatherfans who were a part of the 95 and 01 "even a blind pig finds and acorn once in a great while" feel-good-about-themselves somehow construe making the podunk playoffs every year in the only show in town atmosphere a testimony to their self-professed "great program." Yeah, everybody in the state heads for a 25k stadium!
Meanwhile, check out the programs that have moved up and on during their period of "dominance." In fact, check out the programs that have started from scratch and moved on. Oh well, we'll continue to allow the board of regents to allow them that satisfaction and we can argue with them whether or not a second tier Washington college is better than one of our flagship institutions and in a few years we'll be wondering why the Dakotas, Wyoming and Idaho have all stepped up and aren't looking at past accomplishments in a fatally flawed playoff system.
Let's all bow to Bobby who's doing everything in his power to get out of there to triple his salary as a position coach and one of those stupid bowl conference teams
I think the eye-popping and most telling stat about UM is that they are 2-4 against teams from the SoCon, CAA and Gateway in the playoffs under Buh-bay. Both wins were at home, three losses were at home and the other loss was at a neutral site. So you play five home games, no road games and one game at a neutral site and go 2-4. That's where UM is slipping. They can no longer keep up with the teams in the big conferences.Htowngriz wrote:Uhh, wut?
So because a bunch of top seeds lost that means the playoff system is fatally flawed?crazycat wrote:I think the eye-popping and most telling stat about UM is that they are 2-4 against teams from the SoCon, CAA and Gateway in the playoffs under Buh-bay. Both wins were at home, three losses were at home and the other loss was at a neutral site. So you play five home games, no road games and one game at a neutral site and go 2-4. That's where UM is slipping. They can no longer keep up with the teams in the big conferences.Htowngriz wrote:Uhh, wut?
Glenn was 4-1 against teams from those conferences in the playoffs. He won three of the four at home and split the other two on neutral fields. This is what a good coach does...win home playoff games.
Glenn was 7-0 overall in home playoff games in three years. Buh-bay is just 5-4 in five years. His '04 playoff run really saves him. Without it he's just 2-4 at home. That was the year all the top seeds kept getting knocked off right in front of UM and they didn't have to take to the road and play on someone else's home field...an almost sure loser for UM.
This is the difference in Griz football today vs. yesteryear. They no longer have the ability to beat the good teams with consistency even at home.
(Yes, I know you weren't saying 'uh, what' to me.)
Read the last sentence in parenthesis. Then look to the right and check out the emoticon.Htowngriz wrote:So because a bunch of top seeds lost that means the playoff system is fatally flawed?crazycat wrote:I think the eye-popping and most telling stat about UM is that they are 2-4 against teams from the SoCon, CAA and Gateway in the playoffs under Buh-bay. Both wins were at home, three losses were at home and the other loss was at a neutral site. So you play five home games, no road games and one game at a neutral site and go 2-4. That's where UM is slipping. They can no longer keep up with the teams in the big conferences.Htowngriz wrote:Uhh, wut?
Glenn was 4-1 against teams from those conferences in the playoffs. He won three of the four at home and split the other two on neutral fields. This is what a good coach does...win home playoff games.
Glenn was 7-0 overall in home playoff games in three years. Buh-bay is just 5-4 in five years. His '04 playoff run really saves him. Without it he's just 2-4 at home. That was the year all the top seeds kept getting knocked off right in front of UM and they didn't have to take to the road and play on someone else's home field...an almost sure loser for UM.
This is the difference in Griz football today vs. yesteryear. They no longer have the ability to beat the good teams with consistency even at home.
(Yes, I know you weren't saying 'uh, what' to me.)
No, it just means that, as per usual, Cat Grad had a few too many glasses of moonshine before 7:00 am.Htowngriz wrote:So because a bunch of top seeds lost that means the playoff system is fatally flawed?
I just wish we could have the great sucess that the cats have enjoyed the past 20 years.Cat Grad wrote:How can anyone justify the present playoff system? Talk about setting up success for more success--Ape State, for example, has had four extra games and weeks of practice for three consecutive years.
Meanwhile, back to the true spirit of the smack thread; never has a school done so little with so much as the fizzled-out-one-and-done-again.
EVERY STINKING YEAR AND VIRTUALLY NOTHING TO SHOW FOR IT
Be careful what you wish for, you might just get it.Eastcoastgriz wrote:I just wish we could have the great sucess that the cats have enjoyed the past 20 years.Cat Grad wrote:How can anyone justify the present playoff system? Talk about setting up success for more success--Ape State, for example, has had four extra games and weeks of practice for three consecutive years.
Meanwhile, back to the true spirit of the smack thread; never has a school done so little with so much as the fizzled-out-one-and-done-again.
EVERY STINKING YEAR AND VIRTUALLY NOTHING TO SHOW FOR IT
Not in my life time!!!Hawks86 wrote:Be careful what you wish for, you might just get it.Eastcoastgriz wrote:I just wish we could have the great sucess that the cats have enjoyed the past 20 years.Cat Grad wrote:How can anyone justify the present playoff system? Talk about setting up success for more success--Ape State, for example, has had four extra games and weeks of practice for three consecutive years.
Meanwhile, back to the true spirit of the smack thread; never has a school done so little with so much as the fizzled-out-one-and-done-again.
EVERY STINKING YEAR AND VIRTUALLY NOTHING TO SHOW FOR IT