OBAMA

[tampa_griz]

Can somebody explain to us a single crime that a single prisoner in Gitmo committed?

Seriously?

[Griznationalist]

Can somebody explain to us a single crime that a single prisoner in Gitmo committed?

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. I'm just asking.

[tampa_griz]

Can somebody explain to us a single crime that a single prisoner in Gitmo committed?

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. I'm just asking.

Acts of terrorism, mass murder of civilians, among others.

[HassFan]

Thoughts???[/quote]
Well it seems that most are convinced he is Muslim... That is weird HAHA! Either there is a HUGE CONSPIRACY AND HE WILL TAKE OVER THE WORLD!!! or you morons are ignorant and should give the guy a break... I'm guessin alpha is stockin up on his guns and ammo cuz the termination 2nd amendment is on his agenda... am i right?:P[/quote]

I would love to see the speech Obama gave on the arab tv station earlier this week where he explained his "Muslim background".

[Griznationalist]

Can somebody explain to us a single crime that a single prisoner in Gitmo committed?

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. I'm just asking.

Acts of terrorism, mass murder of civilians, among others.

I'm serious, tampa_griz. Is anyone in Gitmo guilty of a crime? Who? What crime?

[tampa_griz]

Can somebody explain to us a single crime that a single prisoner in Gitmo committed?

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. I'm just asking.

Acts of terrorism, mass murder of civilians, among others.

I'm serious, tampa_griz. Is anyone in Gitmo guilty of a crime? Who? What crime?

Hit the link I posted earlier for an example. But I guess it depends on what a crime is.

[Griznationalist]

Can somebody explain to us a single crime that a single prisoner in Gitmo committed?

Seriously?

Yes, seriously. I'm just asking.

Acts of terrorism, mass murder of civilians, among others.

I'm serious, tampa_griz. Is anyone in Gitmo guilty of a crime? Who? What crime?

Hit the link I posted earlier for an example. But I guess it depends on what a crime is.

Using the same source (Wikipedia), I see that of the 775 prisoners, 3 have been convicted, most have no charges against them, and we intend to release most of them because in six years we haven't found evidence to even charge them with crimes.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_prison

[tampa_griz]

Using the same source (Wikipedia), I see that of the 775 prisoners, 3 have been convicted, most have no charges against them, and we intend to release most of them because in six years we haven't found evidence to even charge them with crimes.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_prison

Did you ever see Loose Change?

[Griznationalist]

Using the same source (Wikipedia), I see that of the 775 prisoners, 3 have been convicted, most have no charges against them, and we intend to release most of them because in six years we haven't found evidence to even charge them with crimes.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_prison

Did you ever see Loose Change?

Nope.

[tampa_griz]

Using the same source (Wikipedia), I see that of the 775 prisoners, 3 have been convicted, most have no charges against them, and we intend to release most of them because in six years we haven't found evidence to even charge them with crimes.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_prison

Did you ever see Loose Change?

Nope.

You should. It's based on a true story.

[futurebobcat]

I would love to see the speech Obama gave on the arab tv station earlier this week where he explained his "Muslim background".

..well he touched the bible.. BLASPHEMY!!!! lol
check this out moron..
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22767392/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[futurebobcat]

Using the same source (Wikipedia), I see that of the 775 prisoners, 3 have been convicted, most have no charges against them, and we intend to release most of them because in six years we haven't found evidence to even charge them with crimes.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_prison

...honestly.. you are on their side? they are guilty until proven innocent in my mind.. i believe obamas reason behind g-bay is strictly based on the corruption of our interrogation methods, and it also gives the place a very bad name... now dont jump to conclusions and think that all these 'good Samaritan's' will go free.. they will be rightfully tried in our supreme court system and convicted and put into one of the prisons in the US. so with that being said if someone is wrongfully convicted as you suggest, blame the supreme court judge and jury.. or if someone is wrongfully not convicted.. same thing..
i believe you already knew all this, but i thought i would break it down for ya..
keep it up buddy

[Griznationalist]

Using the same source (Wikipedia), I see that of the 775 prisoners, 3 have been convicted, most have no charges against them, and we intend to release most of them because in six years we haven't found evidence to even charge them with crimes.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_prison

...honestly.. you are on their side? they are guilty until proven innocent in my mind.. i believe obamas reason behind g-bay is strictly based on the corruption of our interrogation methods, and it also gives the place a very bad name... now dont jump to conclusions and think that all these 'good Samaritan's' will go free.. they will be rightfully tried in our supreme court system and convicted and put into one of the prisons in the US. so with that being said if someone is wrongfully convicted as you suggest, blame the supreme court judge and jury.. or if someone is wrongfully not convicted.. same thing..
i believe you already knew all this, but i thought i would break it down for ya..
keep it up buddy

I don't know enough to be "on their side," so my answer is, no, I'm not on their side. I don't believe you or anyone else know enough to be "for them" or "against them," either (why else would the vast majority be sitting there without any charges brought against them and about ready to be freed?). I'm not fighting or arguing with you. I'm just asking, if they are "guilty" in your mind, can you provide us specific details as to the crimes that everyone there committed? Or, are you just trusting George Bush? I'm not slamming you if you're simply trusting Bush. I'm just trying to figure out where you're coming from.

[futurebobcat]

Using the same source (Wikipedia), I see that of the 775 prisoners, 3 have been convicted, most have no charges against them, and we intend to release most of them because in six years we haven't found evidence to even charge them with crimes.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guantanamo_Bay_prison

...honestly.. you are on their side? they are guilty until proven innocent in my mind.. i believe obamas reason behind g-bay is strictly based on the corruption of our interrogation methods, and it also gives the place a very bad name... now dont jump to conclusions and think that all these 'good Samaritan's' will go free.. they will be rightfully tried in our supreme court system and convicted and put into one of the prisons in the US. so with that being said if someone is wrongfully convicted as you suggest, blame the supreme court judge and jury.. or if someone is wrongfully not convicted.. same thing..
i believe you already knew all this, but i thought i would break it down for ya..
keep it up buddy

I don't know enough to be "on their side," so my answer is, no, I'm not on their side. I don't believe you or anyone else know enough to be "for them" or "against them," either (why else would the vast majority be sitting there without any charges brought against them and about ready to be freed?). I'm not fighting or arguing with you. I'm just asking, if they are "guilty" in your mind, can you provide us specific details as to the crimes that everyone there committed? Or, are you just trusting George Bush? I'm not slamming you if you're simply trusting Bush. I'm just trying to figure out where you're coming from.

good point.. well i trust him enough that these guys did something to deserve goin behind bars.. its not some dude flippin paddies at mcdonalds in Baghdad.. or im pretty convinced its not... bush is very stupid, but i dont think he is cruel... cheney on the other hand.. i dunno.

[tampa_griz]

Kind of a moot point anyway. Neither Bush nor Cheney apprehended anyone anywhere.

[dcbeck]

It has also been in the news the past few weeks about some of the detainees getting released and now they are back in leading roles with these different terrorist groups, but don't worry they are good guys with a bad rap.

[TIrwin24]

Actually, now I'm going back on my thought process and realizing that it would be a good idea to send these Gitmo prisoners to our prisons because as soon as they get there, the prison gangs are going to kill them anyways.

[STREETCAT]

Actually, now I'm going back on my thought process and realizing that it would be a good idea to send these Gitmo prisoners to our prisons because as soon as they get there, the prison gangs are going to kill them anyways.

I would rather Grizdelusionist adopt them all into his home. Since there all good guys right?

[Griznationalist]

Actually, now I'm going back on my thought process and realizing that it would be a good idea to send these Gitmo prisoners to our prisons because as soon as they get there, the prison gangs are going to kill them anyways.

I would rather Grizdelusionist adopt them all into his home. Since there all good guys right?

The reading comprehension quotient of some people here appears legally drunk. I never said "there (sic) all good guys." I asked if anyone can tell me a single crime that any of the detainees are guilty of committing. One guy responded with one example. I checked his source (Wiki), which said out of 775 detainees, 3 have been convicted of crimes, the vast majority were never charged with anything, and many have been released. TIrwin24 and STREETCAT must have some inside information that George Bush could never find in regard to evidence against these detainees.

[cats2506]

Actually, now I'm going back on my thought process and realizing that it would be a good idea to send these Gitmo prisoners to our prisons because as soon as they get there, the prison gangs are going to kill them anyways.

I would rather Grizdelusionist adopt them all into his home. Since there all good guys right?

The reading comprehension quotient of some people here appears legally drunk. I never said "there (sic) all good guys." I asked if anyone can tell me a single crime that any of the detainees are guilty of committing. One guy responded with one example. I checked his source (Wiki), which said out of 775 detainees, 3 have been convicted of crimes, the vast majority were never charged with anything, and many have been released. TIrwin24 and STREETCAT must have some inside information that George Bush could never find in regard to evidence against these detainees.

They are guilty of being enemy combatants on the field of battle in the global war on terrorism against the United States od America

I hope they rot in GITMO