Hauck Ignorant?

The place to talk smack with those not fortunate enough to be Bobcat fans.

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

autocat
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:35 pm

Hauck Ignorant?

Post by autocat » Tue Sep 22, 2009 6:49 pm

Is this man ignorant? Name a starter at QB! Watch out for the floodgates of criticism on this( the first three and out by whoever) there is not a qb on the roster good enough now! Wait, maybe when one qb gets a concussion and another one gets injured that's when a starter is named. Sorry, silly me.



User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 23996
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by SonomaCat » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:18 pm

It's hard to criticize an undefeated coach's decisions, but it does happen.



GrizinWashington
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7992
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by GrizinWashington » Tue Sep 22, 2009 7:24 pm

Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.


We're all here 'cause we ain't all there.

User avatar
cats2506
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Lewistown

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by cats2506 » Tue Sep 22, 2009 9:31 pm

GrizinWashington wrote:Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.
Roper is looking like a dud, as much as everyone (bobby included) wants him to be the guy, Selle is steady enough get them into the playoffs, Kempt as a wildcat is intruging and give teams somthing else to prepare for. Roper gets another shot is my guess but unless he really shines he will settle for Selle.


PlayerRep wrote:The point is not the record of the teams UM beat, it's the quality and record of the teams UM almost beat.

Toucat
BobcatNation Letterman
Posts: 261
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:14 pm

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by Toucat » Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:38 am

cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.
Roper is looking like a dud, as much as everyone (bobby included) wants him to be the guy, Selle is steady enough get them into the playoffs, Kempt as a wildcat is intruging and give teams somthing else to prepare for. Roper gets another shot is my guess but unless he really shines he will settle for Selle.
I don't think you can call Roper a dud. The QB ratings for both Selle and Roper are very good. I do agree that it appears Selle has the upper hand and Roper will need to shine to win the spot.



User avatar
cats2506
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Lewistown

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by cats2506 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 10:03 am

Toucat wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.
Roper is looking like a dud, as much as everyone (bobby included) wants him to be the guy, Selle is steady enough get them into the playoffs, Kempt as a wildcat is intruging and give teams somthing else to prepare for. Roper gets another shot is my guess but unless he really shines he will settle for Selle.
I don't think you can call Roper a dud. The QB ratings for both Selle and Roper are very good. I do agree that it appears Selle has the upper hand and Roper will need to shine to win the spot.
I said looking like a dud, maybe that wasnt quite right, but based on the hype put out by the moroon koolaid drinkers he is not living up to expectations, with the concussion (not his first) I dont think he will be back for a few weeks. Selle looks like he is up to the task though so they are fine at the QB position.


PlayerRep wrote:The point is not the record of the teams UM beat, it's the quality and record of the teams UM almost beat.

User avatar
Billings_Griz
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4637
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Flatlands

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by Billings_Griz » Wed Sep 23, 2009 11:50 am

Hauck Ignorant? Nah.

Roper a dud...oh, excuse me, "looking" like a dud. No. However, you'd kill for him w/ what you guys have at QB. Oh wait, you have a Pac-10 drop down. How's he working out for ya?



User avatar
cats2506
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Lewistown

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by cats2506 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 12:00 pm

Billings_Griz wrote:Hauck Ignorant? Nah.

Roper a dud...oh, excuse me, "looking" like a dud. No. However, you'd kill for him w/ what you guys have at QB. Oh wait, you have a Pac-10 drop down. How's he working out for ya?
bout like your Pac 10 drop down, spends most of his time on the sidelines, I doubt that roper plays a full game for you this year.


PlayerRep wrote:The point is not the record of the teams UM beat, it's the quality and record of the teams UM almost beat.

GrizinWashington
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7992
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by GrizinWashington » Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:06 pm

cats2506 wrote:
Toucat wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.
Roper is looking like a dud, as much as everyone (bobby included) wants him to be the guy, Selle is steady enough get them into the playoffs, Kempt as a wildcat is intruging and give teams somthing else to prepare for. Roper gets another shot is my guess but unless he really shines he will settle for Selle.
I don't think you can call Roper a dud. The QB ratings for both Selle and Roper are very good. I do agree that it appears Selle has the upper hand and Roper will need to shine to win the spot.
I said looking like a dud, maybe that wasnt quite right, but based on the hype put out by the moroon koolaid drinkers he is not living up to expectations, with the concussion (not his first) I dont think he will be back for a few weeks. Selle looks like he is up to the task though so they are fine at the QB position.
That's odd. I remember most of the "maroon Kool-Aid drinkers" on this board saying they weren't certain that Roper would even get the nod over Selle, and almost all of the Cat fans (and almost certainly you, 2506) were absolutely CERTAIN that there was no way Hauck wouldn't play Roper all year.


We're all here 'cause we ain't all there.

User avatar
cats2506
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Lewistown

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by cats2506 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 2:26 pm

GrizinWashington wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
Toucat wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.
Roper is looking like a dud, as much as everyone (bobby included) wants him to be the guy, Selle is steady enough get them into the playoffs, Kempt as a wildcat is intruging and give teams somthing else to prepare for. Roper gets another shot is my guess but unless he really shines he will settle for Selle.
I don't think you can call Roper a dud. The QB ratings for both Selle and Roper are very good. I do agree that it appears Selle has the upper hand and Roper will need to shine to win the spot.
I said looking like a dud, maybe that wasnt quite right, but based on the hype put out by the moroon koolaid drinkers he is not living up to expectations, with the concussion (not his first) I dont think he will be back for a few weeks. Selle looks like he is up to the task though so they are fine at the QB position.
That's odd. I remember most of the "maroon Kool-Aid drinkers" on this board saying they weren't certain that Roper would even get the nod over Selle, and almost all of the Cat fans (and almost certainly you, 2506) were absolutely CERTAIN that there was no way Hauck wouldn't play Roper all year.
You can do better than that DHiW, It was all over the dark board about how he was gonna light things up.

Find one post before this week where I even commented on Roper, let alone said I was CERTAIN the nose would play him all year?


PlayerRep wrote:The point is not the record of the teams UM beat, it's the quality and record of the teams UM almost beat.

User avatar
Billings_Griz
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 4637
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:01 pm
Location: Flatlands

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by Billings_Griz » Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:04 pm

cats2506 wrote:
Billings_Griz wrote:Hauck Ignorant? Nah.

Roper a dud...oh, excuse me, "looking" like a dud. No. However, you'd kill for him w/ what you guys have at QB. Oh wait, you have a Pac-10 drop down. How's he working out for ya?
bout like your Pac 10 drop down, spends most of his time on the sidelines, I doubt that roper plays a full game for you this year.
We won't play just one qb in ANY game this year. If Roper is a "go", we'll play THREE. Any of which would be your #1. 8)



User avatar
cats2506
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Lewistown

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by cats2506 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:31 pm

Billings_Griz wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
Billings_Griz wrote:Hauck Ignorant? Nah.

Roper a dud...oh, excuse me, "looking" like a dud. No. However, you'd kill for him w/ what you guys have at QB. Oh wait, you have a Pac-10 drop down. How's he working out for ya?
bout like your Pac 10 drop down, spends most of his time on the sidelines, I doubt that roper plays a full game for you this year.
We won't play just one qb in ANY game this year. If Roper is a "go", we'll play THREE. Any of which would be your #1. 8)
Thats a big IF there, he dont even remember last saturday after that little bump out by PSU

http://www.missoulian.com/sports/colleg ... 03286.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


PlayerRep wrote:The point is not the record of the teams UM beat, it's the quality and record of the teams UM almost beat.

GrizinWashington
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7992
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by GrizinWashington » Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:50 pm

cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
Toucat wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.
Roper is looking like a dud, as much as everyone (bobby included) wants him to be the guy, Selle is steady enough get them into the playoffs, Kempt as a wildcat is intruging and give teams somthing else to prepare for. Roper gets another shot is my guess but unless he really shines he will settle for Selle.
I don't think you can call Roper a dud. The QB ratings for both Selle and Roper are very good. I do agree that it appears Selle has the upper hand and Roper will need to shine to win the spot.
I said looking like a dud, maybe that wasnt quite right, but based on the hype put out by the moroon koolaid drinkers he is not living up to expectations, with the concussion (not his first) I dont think he will be back for a few weeks. Selle looks like he is up to the task though so they are fine at the QB position.
That's odd. I remember most of the "maroon Kool-Aid drinkers" on this board saying they weren't certain that Roper would even get the nod over Selle, and almost all of the Cat fans (and almost certainly you, 2506) were absolutely CERTAIN that there was no way Hauck wouldn't play Roper all year.
You can do better than that DHiW, It was all over the dark board about how he was gonna light things up.

Find one post before this week where I even commented on Roper, let alone said I was CERTAIN the nose would play him all year?

You're correct; I owe you an apology. You were not involved in the SEVEN page thread by cat fans who claimed that Roper would start no matter what....


http://www.bobcatnation.com/bobcatbb/vi ... ilit=roper" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


We're all here 'cause we ain't all there.

User avatar
MSU Toddler
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Helena, MT

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by MSU Toddler » Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:08 pm

who cares?


Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.

autocat
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by autocat » Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:33 pm

The point is somebody should be named the starter, the sooner the better IMO. If the griz are 6-0, 7-0, 8-0 with rotating Qb's I'll be a believer, but show me a football team at any level that is playing 3 qb's and not because of injuries. Maybe I'm not giving Bob enough credit for his coaching ability. Bob said that Selle is going to start because, " he's going to get more practice time." I think it might be a case of having 3 mediocre QB's and not knowing what to do, too much uncertainty.



User avatar
cats2506
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 9501
Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:35 pm
Location: Lewistown

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by cats2506 » Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:53 pm

GrizinWashington wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
Toucat wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.
Roper is looking like a dud, as much as everyone (bobby included) wants him to be the guy, Selle is steady enough get them into the playoffs, Kempt as a wildcat is intruging and give teams somthing else to prepare for. Roper gets another shot is my guess but unless he really shines he will settle for Selle.
I don't think you can call Roper a dud. The QB ratings for both Selle and Roper are very good. I do agree that it appears Selle has the upper hand and Roper will need to shine to win the spot.
I said looking like a dud, maybe that wasnt quite right, but based on the hype put out by the moroon koolaid drinkers he is not living up to expectations, with the concussion (not his first) I dont think he will be back for a few weeks. Selle looks like he is up to the task though so they are fine at the QB position.
That's odd. I remember most of the "maroon Kool-Aid drinkers" on this board saying they weren't certain that Roper would even get the nod over Selle, and almost all of the Cat fans (and almost certainly you, 2506) were absolutely CERTAIN that there was no way Hauck wouldn't play Roper all year.
You can do better than that DHiW, It was all over the dark board about how he was gonna light things up.

Find one post before this week where I even commented on Roper, let alone said I was CERTAIN the nose would play him all year?

You're correct; I owe you an apology. You were not involved in the SEVEN page thread by cat fans who claimed that Roper would start no matter what....


http://www.bobcatnation.com/bobcatbb/vi ... ilit=roper" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And didnt Roper get the majority of plays in the big season opener with Western State Insurance?

So actually not only do you owe me an apology but the posters that posted on that thread were right too in that bobby showed that he will wanting to go with Roper but it just isnt working out now that we are into the season.


PlayerRep wrote:The point is not the record of the teams UM beat, it's the quality and record of the teams UM almost beat.

User avatar
BDizzle
Honorable Mention All-BobcatNation
Posts: 943
Joined: Thu Oct 23, 2008 12:31 pm
Location: Billings and Missoula on the fall weekends

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by BDizzle » Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:26 pm

cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
Toucat wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
GrizinWashington wrote:Why should he name a starter? He's got Souers and Company pulling their damn hair out in Flagstaff trying to figure out how to prepare for Selle, Roper and even Kemp. If you think that's idiotic, that's pretty much the reason he's on the sideline and you're on a message board.
Roper is looking like a dud, as much as everyone (bobby included) wants him to be the guy, Selle is steady enough get them into the playoffs, Kempt as a wildcat is intruging and give teams somthing else to prepare for. Roper gets another shot is my guess but unless he really shines he will settle for Selle.
I don't think you can call Roper a dud. The QB ratings for both Selle and Roper are very good. I do agree that it appears Selle has the upper hand and Roper will need to shine to win the spot.
I said looking like a dud, maybe that wasnt quite right, but based on the hype put out by the moroon koolaid drinkers he is not living up to expectations, with the concussion (not his first) I dont think he will be back for a few weeks. Selle looks like he is up to the task though so they are fine at the QB position.
That's odd. I remember most of the "maroon Kool-Aid drinkers" on this board saying they weren't certain that Roper would even get the nod over Selle, and almost all of the Cat fans (and almost certainly you, 2506) were absolutely CERTAIN that there was no way Hauck wouldn't play Roper all year.
You can do better than that DHiW, It was all over the dark board about how he was gonna light things up.

Find one post before this week where I even commented on Roper, let alone said I was CERTAIN the nose would play him all year?

You're correct; I owe you an apology. You were not involved in the SEVEN page thread by cat fans who claimed that Roper would start no matter what....


http://www.bobcatnation.com/bobcatbb/vi ... ilit=roper" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
And didnt Roper get the majority of plays in the big season opener with Western State Insurance?

So actually not only do you owe me an apology but the posters that posted on that thread were right too in that bobby showed that he will wanting to go with Roper but it just isnt working out now that we are into the season.
Actually Selle got the start aginst Western St. and both played six series. Selle played the first 3 series, roper the next 3, then selle, then roper. Roper just got more plays because he moved the ball better. Roper got the start against UC-Davis and again they rotated after 3 series. Roper IMO played better against UC-Davis and got the start against Portland State. Never know how that would've turned out as he got hurt. Selle came in and played great. Like its been mentioned before, the 3 QBs plus 1 WR/exQB that the Griz have are better than anything the Bobcats have right now.


GO GRIZ!

GrizinWashington
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 7992
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:30 pm

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by GrizinWashington » Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:44 pm

No. Selle and Roper split time in that game. So...I guess you owe me an apology 2506 if we want to get all technical.


We're all here 'cause we ain't all there.

autocat
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by autocat » Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:57 pm

I agree, there needs to be an apology! I forgot to give my assessment of the griz qb's: 1) Selle- Not consistent enough after 3 years in the program, that's why he hasn't been named the starter. 2) Roper- looks like a swimmer or a cross country runner/marathoner, looks like he doesn't have enough strength to walk up a flight of stairs, at 6'7 165 pounds, should probably be on the hoops team. 3) Kemp- apparently doesn't have any cartilage in his throwing arm, had to run 10 straight times in the PSU game! 3 mediocre qb's, too much uncertainty!



autocat
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 717
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:35 pm

Re: Hauck Ignorant?

Post by autocat » Wed Sep 23, 2009 6:14 pm

Let's clarify something! Several of you owe Cats2506 the apology!



Post Reply