To go down a different path from the rest of the thread, it appears that the WTO appears with the rationale of the Catholic church:Hell's Bells wrote:Nice try Bac i am not going to let you get away with overgeneralizing a article even an hour before a chem test.
basically the article is about a pre school teacher that got fired for having a child out of wedlock. While yes, I will agree with you firing her because she got pregnent sounds bad, just by taking the teaching posation at a catholic school obligated her to be a roll model to her kids. I am willing to bet that as part of her employment contract it stipulated that by getting pregnent before marrage, or doing anything else that can bring shame down upon the school, example drinking and driving, sleeping with a student, child porn addiction...and ect, can and will result in her termination. She has the responsibility to be a good role model to her students, and by getting pregnenet without a husband *i think the kids will tell if she is wearing a ring or not...* that shows the kids that it is the christain way to get pregenent out of wedlock...= Bill O'Reilly]Christians are entitled to same sensibilities and courtesies every other religion receives in this country. Hope you agree.
back to studying chem
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f ... 104S38.DTL
I actually believe that private entities should have the right to hire and fire as they please. I'm not sure of the ACLU position on the school thing -- does the school get any public money? That would make a huge difference. If it doesn't, then strictly from a philosophical perspective (as I am not familiar with the applicable law), I think both the Catholics and the WTO are totally justified in firing people that don't fit their own moral or health standards.