Enough said

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Fri Dec 23, 2005 12:04 am

You would want another man to bite you...

grizzh8r · Post by **grizzh8r** » Fri Dec 23, 2005 12:37 am

Swilly3224 wrote:

G-d Dam that kid has skills.....

Or as Stuart Scott would say "Bush got all KRUNK on the Bruins" or "That's just STUPID"

MSUCATS · Post by **MSUCATS** » Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:59 am

You would want another man to bite you...

Who said that you were a man??

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Fri Dec 23, 2005 11:12 am

MSUCATS wrote:
You would want another man to bite you...
Who said that you were a man??

Good one....

CARDIAC_CATS · Post by **CARDIAC_CATS** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:08 pm

Swilly3224 wrote:

That kind of reminds of of Groves going over the top to score on the Griz.

16-6! Yes, I said 6 points. 6 points scored from the Mecca of 1-AA football.

UMclassof2002 · Post by **UMclassof2002** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:23 pm

CARDIAC_CATS wrote:
Swilly3224 wrote:
That kind of reminds of of Groves going over the top to score on the Griz.

16-6! Yes, I said 6 points. 6 points scored from the Mecca of 1-AA football.

Savor the flavor b/c those days are just about done. Let's see:

QB improvements: check
WR upgrade: check
addition of dual threat RB: check
game in WA-Griz: check

Plus you have lost the only reason, Lulay, that you have any victories over us in the last 20 years (LOL).

Konechiwa, bitches.

catsrback76 · Post by **catsrback76** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:34 pm

UMclassof2002 wrote:
CARDIAC_CATS wrote:
Swilly3224 wrote:
That kind of reminds of of Groves going over the top to score on the Griz.

16-6! Yes, I said 6 points. 6 points scored from the Mecca of 1-AA football.
Savor the flavor b/c those days are just about done. Let's see:

QB improvements: check
WR upgrade: check
addition of dual threat RB: check
game in WA-Griz: check

Plus you have lost the only reason, Lulay, that you have any victories over us in the last 20 years (LOL).

Interesting thoughts '02. The ONLY reason we won was Lulay-- inferring the ONLY reason you lost was Berquist.

But then you list ALL the other improvements you need to have in place to compete next year. Assuming that you get a QB improvement, and that you get the improved recieving corps, and you get an improved running game-- I would have to agree, it will be competitive next year. Because we will have all that and more-- CALLED MOMENTUM- 3 outta 4 and this years win.

It's funny what fear brings out from those who were once cocky.

Still have the trophy-- it looks great.

catsrback76 · Post by **catsrback76** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:36 pm

BTW: Your nose is still bleeding.

catamaran · Post by **catamaran** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 5:39 pm

cUMglass2002 says "Savor the flavor b/c those days are just about done. Let's see:

QB improvements: check
WR upgrade: check
addition of dual threat RB: check
game in WA-Griz: check

Sounds like the same argument you guys would win this year....How'd that go

UMclassof2002 · Post by **UMclassof2002** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:03 pm

catsrback76 wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
CARDIAC_CATS wrote:
Swilly3224 wrote:
That kind of reminds of of Groves going over the top to score on the Griz.

16-6! Yes, I said 6 points. 6 points scored from the Mecca of 1-AA football.
Savor the flavor b/c those days are just about done. Let's see:

QB improvements: check
WR upgrade: check
addition of dual threat RB: check
game in WA-Griz: check

Plus you have lost the only reason, Lulay, that you have any victories over us in the last 20 years (LOL).
Interesting thoughts '02. The ONLY reason we won was Lulay-- inferring the ONLY reason you lost was Berquist.

But then you list ALL the other improvements you need to have in place to compete next year. Assuming that you get a QB improvement, and that you get the improved recieving corps, and you get an improved running game-- I would have to agree, it will be competitive next year. Because we will have all that and more-- CALLED MOMENTUM- 3 outta 4 and this years win.

It's funny what fear brings out from those who were once cocky.
Still have the trophy-- it looks great.

How could I have inferred that the only reason we lost was Bergquist when I was referring to last FEW years? The common denominator was Lulay, and now he is gone. If we had any semblance of offense this year we would've scored more than 6 points, ergo, the game would've been closer. So, by logical extension:

-Your greatest player has graduated meaning that advantage (both offensive and intangibles) have been eliminated.
-Our offensive problems have been/are being dealt with via I-A transfers and maturation of players already in the program.
-The game is on our turf

Get ready for another 16 in a row (16....damn that's crazy)

UMclassof2002 · Post by **UMclassof2002** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:06 pm

catamaran wrote:
cUMglass2002 says "Savor the flavor b/c those days are just about done. Let's see:

QB improvements: check
WR upgrade: check
addition of dual threat RB: check
game in WA-Griz: check
Sounds like the same argument you guys would win this year....How'd that go

Yes, many Griz fans made the argument that we would win the game this year because the game was in Wash-Griz.

Also, many Griz fans were making the point the Bergquist is better than Ochs

And we certainly added a dual threat RB for this years game

But I guess some of us thought that Allen would pan out better than he did. Congrats on going 1 for 4.

catsrback76 · Post by **catsrback76** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:23 pm

UMclassof2002 wrote:
catsrback76 wrote:
UMclassof2002 wrote:
CARDIAC_CATS wrote:
Swilly3224 wrote:
That kind of reminds of of Groves going over the top to score on the Griz.

16-6! Yes, I said 6 points. 6 points scored from the Mecca of 1-AA football.
Savor the flavor b/c those days are just about done. Let's see:

QB improvements: check
WR upgrade: check
addition of dual threat RB: check
game in WA-Griz: check

Plus you have lost the only reason, Lulay, that you have any victories over us in the last 20 years (LOL).
Interesting thoughts '02. The ONLY reason we won was Lulay-- inferring the ONLY reason you lost was Berquist.

But then you list ALL the other improvements you need to have in place to compete next year. Assuming that you get a QB improvement, and that you get the improved recieving corps, and you get an improved running game-- I would have to agree, it will be competitive next year. Because we will have all that and more-- CALLED MOMENTUM- 3 outta 4 and this years win.

It's funny what fear brings out from those who were once cocky.
Still have the trophy-- it looks great.

How could I have inferred that the only reason we lost was Bergquist when I was referring to last FEW years? The common denominator was Lulay, and now he is gone. If we had any semblance of offense this year we would've scored more than 6 points, ergo, the game would've been closer. So, by logical extension:

-Your greatest player has graduated meaning that advantage (both offensive and intangibles) have been eliminated.
-Our offensive problems have been/are being dealt with via I-A transfers and maturation of players already in the program.
-The game is on our turf

Get ready for another 16 in a row (16....damn that's crazy)

The point I was making '02 is exactly the same one you make, the past 4 years with Lulay have been a team effort, not simply Lulay. No doubt Travis was the leader and he created the opportunities from his position, but no man, even Lulay does it alone.

I think our defense had alot to do with those wins, maybe more than the offense. Our defense will be back with a vengence next year after winning the battle for the number 1 defense.

Our offense is not focused on 1 man, as evidenced by Groves running away on that slippery field with offensive honors. Get ready, the strength of the team has risen to more than a one man show.

There will be no 16 in a row's and even you know it. We'll probably lose a few from time to time over the next 16 years.

94VegasCat · Post by **94VegasCat** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:37 pm

catsrback76 wrote:BTW: Your nose is still bleeding.

Did somebody punch BABY?

catsrback76 · Post by **catsrback76** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 6:55 pm

94VegasCat wrote:
catsrback76 wrote:BTW: Your nose is still bleeding.
Did somebody punch BABY?

Yep 16-6

Still bleeding...

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 8:37 pm

Funny how a post about Reggie Bush turns into a fight....

Griz win next year by 24

catsrback76 · Post by **catsrback76** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:16 pm

Swilly3224 wrote:Funny how a post about Reggie Bush turns into a fight....

Griz win next year by 24

In the words of ELO " Dreamer, you're nothing but a dreamer..."

Are you just going to stand there and bleed? 16-6

UMclassof2002 · Post by **UMclassof2002** » Tue Dec 27, 2005 9:26 pm

LMAO @ Bobcat delusion.

So, 76, basically what you are saying is that the Bobcat D was garbage for 16 consecutive years and then when Lulay arrives all of a sudden your defense coincidentally turned into nails at that same precise moment? I call ******. Your team had over a decade and a half of losing before TL arrived and THEN you started winning games. Not before. And certainly not after. Face it - this year you had the good fortune of playing against the worst Griz offense perhaps ever on your own turf and could only win by ten.

Your winning streak over The Flagship stops at 1.

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Wed Dec 28, 2005 3:56 pm

catsrback76 wrote:
Swilly3224 wrote:Funny how a post about Reggie Bush turns into a fight....

Griz win next year by 24
In the words of ELO " Dreamer, you're nothing but a dreamer..."

Are you just going to stand there and bleed? 16-6

Its basketball season

grizzh8r · Post by **grizzh8r** » Wed Dec 28, 2005 11:35 pm

UMclassof2002 wrote:...The Flagship...

Hold the back door for me 02. I gotta go puke now...

catatac · Post by **catatac** » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:20 am

UMclassof2002 wrote:LMAO @ Bobcat delusion.

So, 76, basically what you are saying is that the Bobcat D was garbage for 16 consecutive years and then when Lulay arrives all of a sudden your defense coincidentally turned into nails at that same precise moment? I call ******. Your team had over a decade and a half of losing before TL arrived and THEN you started winning games. Not before. And certainly not after. Face it - this year you had the good fortune of playing against the worst Griz offense perhaps ever on your own turf and could only win by ten.

Your winning streak over The Flagship stops at 1.

Actually the winning is mainly due to the program Kramer built. Lulay definitely helped the cause but if you look back I think we've had statistically the best defense in the Big Sky for 4 of the past 5 years. Probably didn't happen once in the "decade and a half" before Kramer arrived. No coincidence there...

Enough said

Re: Enough said

Re: Enough said

Re: Enough said

Re: Enough said

Re: Enough said

Re: Enough said