letterman/O'Reilly spar

A mellow place for Bobcats to discuss topics free of political posturing

Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat

Post Reply
User avatar
briannell
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1223
Joined: Mon Sep 13, 2004 11:49 am
Contact:

letterman/O'Reilly spar

Post by briannell » Fri Jan 06, 2006 10:47 am

sorry for the length of post, but this was entertaining to watch :D


The Culture War Plays Out on 'Letterman'

Friday, January 06, 2006

By Bill O'Reilly



The "Talking Points Memo": the culture war plays out on the David Letterman program. Right now, there are two main issues dominating the culture war in America, the role of God in the public arena and the war on terror, including the Iraq campaign.

The Christmas controversy was all about the ACLU and others trying to de-emphasize Judeo-Christian tradition in America. All the nonsense was because of that.

On the Iraq front, the secular progressive movement sees America as the wrongdoer in the conflict. Traditionalists see the USA as doing something noble.

Now occasionally, I will venture on to entertainment programs to try and reach a new audience. And I usually enjoy the joust. I also appreciate every invitation I get.

Last night, I was prepared for just about anything with David Letterman. And here's how it went.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

DAVID LETTERMAN, HOST, "THE DAVID LETTERMAN SHOW": How were your holidays, good?

O'REILLY: I had a nice winter solstice, yes.

(LAUGHTER)

You can't say Christmas.

LETTERMAN: You can't say Christmas?

O'REILLY: No.

LETTERMAN: Why is that?

O'REILLY: Because it's politically incorrect. And we did a lot of reporting on this.

LETTERMAN: I wasn't aware that you couldn't say Christmas.

O'REILLY: Yes.

LETTERMAN: When did this happen?

O'REILLY: I actually got a card from a friend of mine that said have a blessed winter.

(LAUGHTER)

I live in New York. You know what you can do with your blessed winter, you know what I'm talking about?

LETTERMAN: I wasn't aware this had happened.

O'REILLY: Yes, you weren't aware of the big, giant controversy over Christmas? You didn't hear that?

LETTERMAN: Well, it doesn't really affect me. I go ahead and do what I want to do. And you know - I mean, but isn't this the kind of thing where like once or twice every 20 years, somebody gets outraged and says, oh, by God, we got to put diapers on horses. Isn't it just about - is this like so what, let it go, it'll take care of itself?

O'REILLY: No. There is a movement in this country by politically correct people to erode traditions.

LETTERMAN: I don't think this is an actual threat. I think that this is something that happened here and it happened there. And so people like you are trying to make us think that it's a threat.

O'REILLY: Wrong.

(APPLAUSE)

Memphis, Tennessee, Bible belt, library, they have a little display where you can — say you are in a duck hunting club. You can bring in a dead duck and put it there and advertise your duck hunting club.

There was a church that wanted to advertise a Christmas pageant. So they brought in the manger scene. And the library said you can have the manger scene in Memphis, Tennessee, but you can't have the baby Jesus, Joseph, or Mary, or the wise men. We're not sure about the shepherds. That was the big debate. Now how stupid and crazy is this?

LETTERMAN: Yes, I don't believe you.

O'REILLY: It's true!

(LAUGHTER)

LETTERMAN: I just don't believe you. Let's talk about your friends in the Bush administration. Things seem to be darker now.

O'REILLY: It's pretty rough, you know, but they're not my friends in the Bush administration. I mean, they're not kicking the door down to be on my show.

In fact, you have an easier time getting President Bush to come on here than I have in getting him on "“The Factor”." But I think that the Iraq thing has been full of unintended consequences.

The simplistic stuff about it, hating Bush or he lied and all this stuff does the country no good at all. Our philosophy is we call it as we see it. Sometimes you agree. Sometimes you don't. Robust debate is good.

But we believe that the United States, particularly the military, are doing a noble thing.

LETTERMAN: Mm-hmm.

O'REILLY: A noble thing. The soldiers and Marines are noble. They're not terrorists. And when people call them that, like Cindy Sheehan called the insurgents freedom fighters, we don't like that.

It is a vitally important time in American history. And we should all take it very seriously, and be very careful with what we say.

LETTERMAN: Well, and you should be very careful with what you say also.

O'REILLY: Exactly.

LETTERMAN: Have you lost family members in armed conflict?

O'REILLY: No, I have not.

LETTERMAN: Well, then you can hardly speak for her, can you?

O'REILLY: Well, I'm not speaking for her.

(APPLAUSE)

All right, let me ask you this question.

LETTERMAN: Let's go back to your little red and green story.

O'REILLY: Wait, wait, wait, this is important. This is important. Cindy Sheehan lost a son, a professional soldier in Iraq, correct? She has a right to grieve any way she wants. She has a right to say whatever she wants.

When she says to the public that the insurgents and terrorists are freedom fighters, how do you think, David Letterman, that makes people who lost loved ones by these people blowing the hell out of them, how do you think they feel? What about their feelings, sir?

LETTERMAN: So why are we there in the first place? I agree to you — with you that we have to support the troops. They are there. They are the best and the brightest of this country.

(APPLAUSE)

There's no doubt about that.

And I also agree that now we're in it, it's going to take a long, long time. People don't expect it to be solved and wrapped up in a couple of years. Unrealistic. It's not going to happen.

I'm very concerned about people like yourself who don't have nothing but endless sympathy for a woman like Cindy Sheehan, honest to Christ.

O'REILLY: No, I'm sorry. No way a terrorist who blows up women and children is going to be called a freedom fighter on my program.

(APPLAUSE)

LETTERMAN: I'm not smart enough to debate you point to point on this, but I have the feeling — I have the feeling about.

O'REILLY: You (INAUDIBLE).

LETTERMAN: I have the feeling about 60 percent of what you say is crap, but I don't know that for a fact.

O'REILLY: Sixty?

LETTERMAN: Did I 60 percent? 60 percent, that's just — I'm just spit balling here now.

O'REILLY: Listen, I respect your opinion. You should respect mine.

LETTERMAN: Well, I — I - yes, OK.

(APPLAUSE)

But I think you're.

O'REILLY: Our analysis is based on the best evidence we can get.

LETTERMAN: Yes, but I think there's something — this fair and balanced, I'm not sure that it's — I don't think that you represent an objective viewpoint.

O'REILLY: But you have to give me an example if you're going to make those statements.

LETTERMAN: Well, I don't watch your show, so that would be impossible.

(LAUGHTER)

O'REILLY: Then why would you come to that conclusion if you don't watch the program?

LETTERMAN: Because of things that I have read, things that I know.

O'REILLY: Oh, come on, you're going to take things that you've read? You know what they say about you? Come on.

(LAUGHTER)

Watch it for a couple — look, watch it for a half an hour. You'll get addicted. You'll be a "Factor" fan. We'll send you a hat.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

O'REILLY: All right, so you saw most of that 10 minute chat, but if you want to see the entire thing unedited, billoreilly.com has it right now


Rebecca
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
Please donate to PEDS cancer research-
a cure is just around the bend

support mastiff rescue
www.mastiff.org

User avatar
urcrackinmeup
BobcatNation Team Captain
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 12:27 pm
Location: bozo

Re: letterman/O'Reilly spar

Post by urcrackinmeup » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:03 pm

I didn't see this but heard it was interesting. I went to a different website and saw the transcript. I think it's interesting where they put the applause in according to the slant. It changes the feel of the whole thing. Here's a little snippet (first from the left, then from the right).....

O'Reilly: It is a vitally important time in American history. And we should all take it very seriously. Be very careful with what we say.
Letterman: Well, and you should be very careful with what you say also.
[audience applause]
O'Reilly: Give me an example.
Letterman: How can you possibly take exception with the motivation and the position of someone like Cindy Sheehan?
O'Reilly: Because I think she's run by far-left elements in this country. I feel bad for the woman.
Letterman: Have you lost family members in armed conflict?
O'Reilly: No, I have not.
Letterman: Well, then you can hardly speak for her, can you?
[applause]
O'Reilly: I'm not speaking for her. Let me ask you this question.
Letterman: [referring back to O'Reilly's phony "War on Christmas"] Let's go back to your little red and green stories.

O'REILLY: It is a vitally important time in American history. And we should all take it very seriously, and be very careful with what we say.
LETTERMAN: Well, and you should be very careful with what you say also.
O'REILLY: Exactly.
LETTERMAN: Have you lost family members in armed conflict?
O'REILLY: No, I have not.
LETTERMAN: Well, then you can hardly speak for her, can you?
O'REILLY: Well, I'm not speaking for her.
(APPLAUSE)
All right, let me ask you this question.
LETTERMAN: Let's go back to your little red and green story.



User avatar
SonomaCat
Moderator
Posts: 24000
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 7:56 pm
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Contact:

Post by SonomaCat » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:09 pm

You noticed that too, huh? I think O'Reilly's transcript originally had him being carried out of the theater on the shoulders of crying and cheering audience members, but the editor thought that might be taking it a bit too far.



User avatar
HelenaCat95
Golden Bobcat
Posts: 6975
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 1:13 pm
Location: Helena, Montana

Post by HelenaCat95 » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:25 pm

I saw the video replay of the exchange.

While the O'Reilly transcript may have been too loose with putting in the "applause" pauses, in my mind Letterman acted like an idiot.

I have been a Letterman fan for a long time. Always appreciated his dry, and simple humor. Most of the time he can "best" just about any guest on his show - his verbal skills plus his wit is his strength.

However, in this case, while his viewpoints and opinions may have merit, he could not articulate why they had merit. Thus, in my opinion, he simply came off as uninformed - yet opinionated.

Letterman should leave the uninformed posturing to those of us on the anonymous internet. :wink:



User avatar
catamaran
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3802
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 1:31 pm

Post by catamaran » Fri Jan 06, 2006 2:38 pm

You can see the clip on BillOReilly.com. It's a pretty interesting exchange


if you're keeping score, France gave us Burgundy wine, cigarettes, berets, B.O., brie and the Napoleon complex-Bill Simmons

User avatar
BWahlberg
2nd Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1375
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 5:13 pm
Location: Missoula
Contact:

Post by BWahlberg » Fri Jan 06, 2006 3:46 pm

=D^ To Dave, Bill O'lielly annoys me.



User avatar
Ponycat
1st Team All-BobcatNation
Posts: 1885
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 3:52 pm

Post by Ponycat » Fri Jan 06, 2006 5:34 pm

Re/Max Griz wrote:=D^ To Dave, Bill O'lielly annoys me.
I love O'Rielly, but find myself enjoying the program more when Kasich is on there. I also love Letterman but think he came off a little bad here. I think he has been hanging out with his buddy Stuart Smalley a little to much.


The devil made me do it the first time... the second time I done it on my own.

whitetrashgriz
BobcatNation Hall of Famer
Posts: 3381
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 7:00 pm

Post by whitetrashgriz » Fri Jan 06, 2006 6:58 pm

how much say does letterman have in who is on his show? you would think he has a lot of pull on who is on. yet, what i dont get is that he seemed annoyed with oreilly from the beginning. if you dislike a guy so much, dont have him on. although, i guess it obviously made for some good tv or we wouldn't be talking about it!



Post Reply