Lulay totally overrated

Go Scats Go · Post by **Go Scats Go** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:02 pm

The Big Meowski wrote:I think this quote from Billy Madison sums it up for our challenged Lulay bashers! Replace Mr. Madison with the offenders names of course.

"Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

I guess Mr Madison did not stat any truth or facts, if this is your best shot you are LAME

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:25 pm

Truth and facts eh? It is said by Cat fans that Lulay is the best QB in our programs history. He is. The stats will back that up. Career leader in passing yards, as Gato already referred to, he is one of four QBs in NCAA History with 10k passing yards and 1k rushing. He is rated ninth out of all QBs invited to the NFL combine. So by saying he is the best QB in MSU history how is that overrating him? Now STFU and have a nice day!

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:25 pm

Talk about overrated! Swoggers career record as a starter is 5-4. I believe that is 56%. Thats worse than Lulays and we all know Lulays playoff record so how do you figure that Swogger will take you to a NC? Just curious.

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:47 pm

Must be naptime at the ol' daycare.

catamaran · Post by **catamaran** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 2:58 pm

Wakey, Wakey, hand off the snakey BB

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:09 pm

MM7CAT wrote:Talk about overrated! Swoggers career record as a starter is 5-4. I believe that is 56%. Thats worse than Lulays and we all know Lulays playoff record so how do you figure that Swogger will take you to a NC? Just curious.

Thats in the pac 10, I there is a little difference between Big Sky ball and Pac 10 ball.....agreed?

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:11 pm

That would mean you are using LOGIC. Something that BearBac cannot understand. I try to keep it simple.

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:19 pm

MM7CAT wrote:That would mean you are using LOGIC. Something that BearBac cannot understand. I try to keep it simple.

Um......after you are done "keeping it simple" then answer my question

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:31 pm

I think the first sentence of my post answered your question. Try to keep up Screech.

catamaran · Post by **catamaran** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:37 pm

Swilly3224 wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:Talk about overrated! Swoggers career record as a starter is 5-4. I believe that is 56%. Thats worse than Lulays and we all know Lulays playoff record so how do you figure that Swogger will take you to a NC? Just curious.
Thats in the pac 10, I there is a little difference between Big Sky ball and Pac 10 ball.....agreed?

There's a big difference between being a Golden domer and a Griz, how'd Rodamer do?

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:38 pm

Acutally I asked if Pac 10 football was different than Big Sky football, not if I was using logic or not. Now answer the question....

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:42 pm

catamaran wrote:
Swilly3224 wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:Talk about overrated! Swoggers career record as a starter is 5-4. I believe that is 56%. Thats worse than Lulays and we all know Lulays playoff record so how do you figure that Swogger will take you to a NC? Just curious.
Thats in the pac 10, I there is a little difference between Big Sky ball and Pac 10 ball.....agreed?
There's a big difference between being a Golden domer and a Griz, how'd Rodamer do?

But did Rodamar start at ND and win 5 games?

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:43 pm

Swilly3224 wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:Talk about overrated! Swoggers career record as a starter is 5-4. I believe that is 56%. Thats worse than Lulays and we all know Lulays playoff record so how do you figure that Swogger will take you to a NC? Just curious.
Thats in the pac 10, I there is a little difference between Big Sky ball and Pac 10 ball.....agreed?

LOGIC would say that there is a difference between Pac-10 and Big Sky football. So just for you to finally understand....YES there is a difference! My point is that you have to fight mindless posts with mindless posts. Hopefully I explained this in a way that you can understand.

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 3:48 pm

MM7CAT wrote:
Swilly3224 wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:Talk about overrated! Swoggers career record as a starter is 5-4. I believe that is 56%. Thats worse than Lulays and we all know Lulays playoff record so how do you figure that Swogger will take you to a NC? Just curious.
Thats in the pac 10, I there is a little difference between Big Sky ball and Pac 10 ball.....agreed?
LOGIC would say that there is a difference between Pac-10 and Big Sky football. So just for you to finally understand....YES there is a difference! My point is that you have to fight mindless posts with mindless posts. Hopefully I explained this in a way that you can understand.

Why didnt you just say that at the beginning? And logic is also that Lulays' winning percentage cant compare to Swoggers winning percentage.

Not Smack-just facts

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:02 pm

You're right, you cant compare them, Swogger has nine career starts, Lulay has over fifty. All I was saying was that if Lulay is overrated you have to say the same about Swogger since he hasn't proven anything to anyone since high school.

lifeloyalsigmsu · Post by **lifeloyalsigmsu** » Fri Feb 03, 2006 4:55 pm

bearBAC wrote:OK kOolaid was wonderful, but now he's gone!

Now that the kittens can no long hang on kOolaid the cum-back kid, is a normal 6-5 season, OK with you?

I'm enamored with your habit of capitalizing the second letter of both kOolaid and kRames.

Pray tell, oh village idiot, what you're trying to prove by doing that.