Sounds like a solid choice for them:
http://msn.foxsports.com/cbk/story/5539572
Northern Colorado B-Ball Coach
Moderators: rtb, kmax, SonomaCat
- LTown Cat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 5677
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:26 pm
- Location: Lewistown, MT
-
mslacat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6157
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:12 am
- Contact:
Re: Northern Colorado B-Ball Coach
I think it will be a solid choice down the line, but it happening so late it will kill them for next year. The thing that hurt them was I think they were only offering about 60% of the $$$$$$$$ what Montana State and Montana offer their head coach. And we are considered the bottom of the barrel D-1 salary wise.
You elected a ****** RAPIST to be our President
-
mslacat
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 6157
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 11:12 am
- Contact:
- twentythreeOh4
- BobcatNation Letterman
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2004 8:08 pm
Mslacat was the conference really better back then? I started following Big Sky basketball in the mid '80's, so I remember Idaho, Boise and Nevada. I also remember that the Big Sky had more than it's fair share of weak sisters back then. NAU, EWU, and ISU were really bad programs. They consistently racked up 20 loss seasons. But even Big Sky powers like Idaho and Weber St had several really bad years in the 80's. As I recall, the conference had 2 or 3 horrible teams every year. Was the league really better when it had so many cupcakes?mslacat wrote:Agreed, it would be nice to get back to the RPI's the Conference had when we had Idaho, Boise and Nevada in the conference.LTown Cat wrote:Hopefully it works out in the long run. We need the Big Sky's RPI to go up.
NAU and EWU are LIGHT YEARS ahead of where they used to be. Even ISU is much more competative now. The last few years, there hasn't been anybody in the league that I consider a pushover. This year the Big Sky was 17th in RPI rating. So you may recall the good old days and think things have gone sour, but I enjoy the hell out of Big Sky basketball now and think things are pretty good now.
-
Cat Grad
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:05 am
twentythreeOh4 wrote:Mslacat was the conference really better back then? I started following Big Sky basketball in the mid '80's, so I remember Idaho, Boise and Nevada. I also remember that the Big Sky had more than it's fair share of weak sisters back then. NAU, EWU, and ISU were really bad programs. They consistently racked up 20 loss seasons. But even Big Sky powers like Idaho and Weber St had several really bad years in the 80's. As I recall, the conference had 2 or 3 horrible teams every year. Was the league really better when it had so many cupcakes?mslacat wrote:Agreed, it would be nice to get back to the RPI's the Conference had when we had Idaho, Boise and Nevada in the conference.LTown Cat wrote:Hopefully it works out in the long run. We need the Big Sky's RPI to go up.
NAU and EWU are LIGHT YEARS ahead of where they used to be. Even ISU is much more competative now. The last few years, there hasn't been anybody in the league that I consider a pushover. This year the Big Sky was 17th in RPI rating. So you may recall the good old days and think things have gone sour, but I enjoy the hell out of Big Sky basketball now and think things are pretty good now.
-
Cat Grad
- Golden Bobcat
- Posts: 7463
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:05 am
And there was even a school that Jud Heathcoate coached when he was between jobs in WAZZU and Michigan State that won a game in the tournament that played UCLA when UCLA was the NCAA tournament close. Had a pretty tall Canadian center, Don Wetzel from Cut Bank, some girl's coach and Glendive's coach from the big town of Outlook on those teams. Few other Montana kids that couldn't do much besides shoot and play defense, pound the boards, play team basketball...kind of like what Krysko has that same team doing now.