Defenseless Grizzlies

[BR GRIZ]

I think this picture sums up the last 15 years of Griz football.

http://www.i-aa.org/

........griz players standing around. Yay. What a great way to remember the last 15 years.

Over the last 15 years there have been a LOT of pictures of Griz players standing around. Holding trophies aloft.

While Cat players were sitting around. Holding the remote aloft

[UMclassof2002]

Welcome to last week.

Yeah, you can mutter 1995 and 2001 in the same breath as that statement too.

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

[GrizinWashington]

I think this picture sums up the last 15 years of Griz football.

http://www.i-aa.org/

........griz players standing around. Yay. What a great way to remember the last 15 years.

Over the last 15 years there have been a LOT of pictures of Griz players standing around. Holding trophies aloft.

I don't see trophies in that pic.

They're already in the trophy case. There's a cat grad janitor dusting them as we speak.

[lifeloyalsigmsu]

Welcome to last week.

Yeah, you can mutter 1995 and 2001 in the same breath as that statement too.

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past? It's ok, you can ignore that aspect of the thread.

Mutterances/irrelevant posts describe someone who posts pictures of jizzlie stars of yesteryear on the BN.com board.

Guess it's time you get yourself together and rethink your next approach for humor.

[UMclassof2002]

Welcome to last week.

Yeah, you can mutter 1995 and 2001 in the same breath as that statement too.

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past?

Consider yourself corrected. And you should probably stop now. You're getting clobbered.



Everytime time I post, I can feel the collective blood pressure of BM.com go up about 50 points. You guys really make it far too easy.





Have a Nice Day!

[lifeloyalsigmsu]

Welcome to last week.

Yeah, you can mutter 1995 and 2001 in the same breath as that statement too.

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past?

Consider yourself corrected. And you should probably stop now. You're getting clobbered.



Everytime time I post, I can feel the collective blood pressure of BM.com go up about 50 points. You guys really make it far too easy.





Have a Nice Day!

Nice deflection.

As I said, regather your thoughts and regarding the collective health of posters on this site, you shouldn't think you have an effect on that. Delusional comes to mind.

[lifeloyalsigmsu]

Loyal is once again "Whiner of the weak"

Cro-Mag,

You are the perfect example for why Roe vs Wade should never be overturned.

[UMclassof2002]

Welcome to last week.

Yeah, you can mutter 1995 and 2001 in the same breath as that statement too.

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past?

Consider yourself corrected. And you should probably stop now. You're getting clobbered.



Everytime time I post, I can feel the collective blood pressure of BM.com go up about 50 points. You guys really make it far too easy.





Have a Nice Day!

Nice deflection.

As I said, regather your thoughts and regarding the collective health of posters on this site, you shouldn't think you have an effect on that. Delusional comes to mind.

Normally you are better at this, but today clearly isn't your day. Bottom line: You brought up the "1995 and 2001" non-sequitur which had nothing to do with my comment and had no relevance to this thread. It is all right there for everyone to see and read. You've been going down in flames ever since. I suspect you know this but you don't want to admit defeat. I'll help you: quit now. Prescribe yourself some beta-blockers and live to fight another day.



The term "slaughter rule" comes to mind.

[lifeloyalsigmsu]

Welcome to last week.

Yeah, you can mutter 1995 and 2001 in the same breath as that statement too.

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past?

Consider yourself corrected. And you should probably stop now. You're getting clobbered.



Everytime time I post, I can feel the collective blood pressure of BM.com go up about 50 points. You guys really make it far too easy.





Have a Nice Day!

Nice deflection.

As I said, regather your thoughts and regarding the collective health of posters on this site, you shouldn't think you have an effect on that. Delusional comes to mind.

Normally you are better at this, but today clearly isn't your day. Bottom line: You brought up the "1995 and 2001" non-sequitur which had nothing to do with my comment and had no relevance to this thread. It is all right there for everyone to see and read. You've been going down in flames ever since. I suspect you know this but you don't want to admit defeat. I'll help you: quit now. Prescribe yourself some beta-blockers and live to fight another day.



The term "slaughter rule" comes to mind.

In case you've forgotten, this is the internet.

I can recommend a good shrink in Seattle for you.

Slow day selling Amway?

[UMclassof2002]

Welcome to last week.

Yeah, you can mutter 1995 and 2001 in the same breath as that statement too.

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past?

Consider yourself corrected. And you should probably stop now. You're getting clobbered.



Everytime time I post, I can feel the collective blood pressure of BM.com go up about 50 points. You guys really make it far too easy.





Have a Nice Day!

Nice deflection.

As I said, regather your thoughts and regarding the collective health of posters on this site, you shouldn't think you have an effect on that. Delusional comes to mind.

Normally you are better at this, but today clearly isn't your day. Bottom line: You brought up the "1995 and 2001" non-sequitur which had nothing to do with my comment and had no relevance to this thread. It is all right there for everyone to see and read. You've been going down in flames ever since. I suspect you know this but you don't want to admit defeat. I'll help you: quit now. Prescribe yourself some beta-blockers and live to fight another day.



The term "slaughter rule" comes to mind.

In case you've forgotten, this is the internet.

I can recommend a good shrink in Seattle for you.

Slow day selling Amway?

It's over, dude. Just stop.

[lifeloyalsigmsu]

loyal is :

How cute. Your sister got you real good there.

[lifeloyalsigmsu]

Yeah, you can mutter 1995 and 2001 in the same breath as that statement too.

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past?

Consider yourself corrected. And you should probably stop now. You're getting clobbered.



Everytime time I post, I can feel the collective blood pressure of BM.com go up about 50 points. You guys really make it far too easy.





Have a Nice Day!

Nice deflection.

As I said, regather your thoughts and regarding the collective health of posters on this site, you shouldn't think you have an effect on that. Delusional comes to mind.

Normally you are better at this, but today clearly isn't your day. Bottom line: You brought up the "1995 and 2001" non-sequitur which had nothing to do with my comment and had no relevance to this thread. It is all right there for everyone to see and read. You've been going down in flames ever since. I suspect you know this but you don't want to admit defeat. I'll help you: quit now. Prescribe yourself some beta-blockers and live to fight another day.



The term "slaughter rule" comes to mind.

In case you've forgotten, this is the internet.

I can recommend a good shrink in Seattle for you.

Slow day selling Amway?

It's over, dude. Just stop.

Did you win an internet battle?

The DSM IV will definitely shed some light on your affliction.

I'll give you a little hint here and let it rest. I'll even type slowly

You said something to the tune of "Welcome to last week".

I responded by saying that 1995 and 2001 can be muttered in the same breath. Are you following me?

Only a griz fan would lose all recollection that many of you throw those championships in those years in Cat fans' faces, hence the reason behind my post and also the fact that those NC's weren't exactly won "last night".

Still with me?

My comment had plenty of relevance to your term "Welcome to last week".

[UMclassof2002]

So this story wasn't posted last week?







No charge.

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past?

Consider yourself corrected. And you should probably stop now. You're getting clobbered.



Everytime time I post, I can feel the collective blood pressure of BM.com go up about 50 points. You guys really make it far too easy.





Have a Nice Day!

Nice deflection.

As I said, regather your thoughts and regarding the collective health of posters on this site, you shouldn't think you have an effect on that. Delusional comes to mind.

Normally you are better at this, but today clearly isn't your day. Bottom line: You brought up the "1995 and 2001" non-sequitur which had nothing to do with my comment and had no relevance to this thread. It is all right there for everyone to see and read. You've been going down in flames ever since. I suspect you know this but you don't want to admit defeat. I'll help you: quit now. Prescribe yourself some beta-blockers and live to fight another day.



The term "slaughter rule" comes to mind.

In case you've forgotten, this is the internet.

I can recommend a good shrink in Seattle for you.

Slow day selling Amway?

It's over, dude. Just stop.

Did you win an internet battle?

The DSM IV will definitely shed some light on your affliction.

I'll give you a little hint here and let it rest. I'll even type slowly

You said something to the tune of "Welcome to last week".

I responded by saying that 1995 and 2001 can be muttered in the same breath. Are you following me?

Only a griz fan would lose all recollection that many of you throw those championships in those years in Cat fans' faces, hence the reason behind my post and also the fact that those NC's weren't exactly won "last night".

Still with me?

My comment had plenty of relevance to your term "Welcome to last week".

Seriously STFU. And I love your standard "this is the internet" response. As if it doesn't matter to you at all (yet, like a trained ape, you are conditioned - nay, almost compelled - to respond to my posts). Yeah, we can tell you let it roll off your back. Congrats, your banana is in the mail.

Funny how you only choose to downplay the medium and/or the value of engaging the argument AFTER you get your ass handed to you on a maroon and silver platter. Textbook white flag bullisht. I expect nothing less from a Montana Light grad and you did not disappoint.





Next!

[MaZooLaGriz]

One game wonders.

[lifeloyalsigmsu]

Not sure about that, but you didn't address what I actually said.

How convenient.

Did I mention 1995 & 2001? No, you did.

Your mutterances are/were irrelevant to anything in my post or CARDIAC's.






You may go now.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but is this not another thread that focuses on the past?

Consider yourself corrected. And you should probably stop now. You're getting clobbered.



Everytime time I post, I can feel the collective blood pressure of BM.com go up about 50 points. You guys really make it far too easy.





Have a Nice Day!

Nice deflection.

As I said, regather your thoughts and regarding the collective health of posters on this site, you shouldn't think you have an effect on that. Delusional comes to mind.

Normally you are better at this, but today clearly isn't your day. Bottom line: You brought up the "1995 and 2001" non-sequitur which had nothing to do with my comment and had no relevance to this thread. It is all right there for everyone to see and read. You've been going down in flames ever since. I suspect you know this but you don't want to admit defeat. I'll help you: quit now. Prescribe yourself some beta-blockers and live to fight another day.



The term "slaughter rule" comes to mind.

In case you've forgotten, this is the internet.

I can recommend a good shrink in Seattle for you.

Slow day selling Amway?

It's over, dude. Just stop.

Did you win an internet battle?

The DSM IV will definitely shed some light on your affliction.

I'll give you a little hint here and let it rest. I'll even type slowly

You said something to the tune of "Welcome to last week".

I responded by saying that 1995 and 2001 can be muttered in the same breath. Are you following me?

Only a griz fan would lose all recollection that many of you throw those championships in those years in Cat fans' faces, hence the reason behind my post and also the fact that those NC's weren't exactly won "last night".

Still with me?

My comment had plenty of relevance to your term "Welcome to last week".

Seriously STFU. And I love your standard "this is the internet" response. As if it doesn't matter to you at all (yet, like a trained ape, you are conditioned - nay, almost compelled - to respond to my posts). Yeah, we can tell you let it roll off your back. Congrats, your banana is in the mail.

Funny how you only choose to downplay the medium and/or the value of engaging the argument AFTER you get your ass handed to you on a maroon and silver platter. Textbook white flag bullisht. I expect nothing less from a Montana Light grad and you did not disappoint.





Next!

To quote you, you hit a dribbler that didn't even reach the pitcher's mound. Oh yeah......you also get a D- for your efforts.

Is this not the internet?

Are you not the person who talks of handing someone's ass to them on a maroon and silver platter? You have some real problems that need to be addressed. Step away from your monitor and go check yourself in somewhere.

Let's see.....you're responding back to me as well so why are you excluding yourself from such conjecture as you address towards me? Are you that dUMb? Keep your banana; I guess it's just as much yours as it is mine since you'll mostly likely respond back right?

I downplayed no medium. I understand your comprehension skills lack since you were formally "educated" at the flagship JUCO of the state of Montana.