street and smith has the kittens at......

Cat Grad · Post by **Cat Grad** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 1:20 am

Swilly3224 wrote:Wheres my explaination?

...what a dumb ******...

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Tue Jun 27, 2006 7:55 am

Here you go Swilly......16-6 refers to the beating the frizzlies took at the hands of the bobcats last November. How quickly you forget.

Thats all the explanation you get from me...you'll have to go to your parents to find out where babies come from.

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:09 pm

MM7CAT wrote:Here you go Swilly......16-6 refers to the beating the frizzlies took at the hands of the bobcats last November. How quickly you forget. Thats all the explanation you get from me...you'll have to go to your parents to find out where babies come from.

Thanks buddy, but that isnt what I asked. If you are so sick of us using the same line over and over then why do you keep using 16-6?

DriftCat · Post by **DriftCat** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 7:42 am

Swilly3224 wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:Here you go Swilly......16-6 refers to the beating the frizzlies took at the hands of the bobcats last November. How quickly you forget. Thats all the explanation you get from me...you'll have to go to your parents to find out where babies come from.
Thanks buddy, but that isnt what I asked. If you are so sick of us using the same line over and over then why do you keep using 16-6?

The reason people are sick of you using the same line over and over is.........................YOU LOST THE GAME! You cant really talk smack about a team that owned you. Can you? So in answer to your question "16-6" is much like when you are beating an opponent badly and they talk smack...you point to the scoreboard. An example of this logic would be you dont see me on a Cal Poly board talking smack to their fans although you probably do Swillinator.

Billings_Griz · Post by **Billings_Griz** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 8:32 am

MM7CAT wrote:
Swilly3224 wrote:
MM7CAT wrote:Here you go Swilly......16-6 refers to the beating the frizzlies took at the hands of the bobcats last November. How quickly you forget. Thats all the explanation you get from me...you'll have to go to your parents to find out where babies come from.
Thanks buddy, but that isnt what I asked. If you are so sick of us using the same line over and over then why do you keep using 16-6?
The reason people are sick of you using the same line over and over is.........................YOU LOST THE GAME! You cant really talk smack about a team that owned you. Can you? So in answer to your question "16-6" is much like when you are beating an opponent badly and they talk smack...you point to the scoreboard. An example of this logic would be you dont see me on a Cal Poly board talking smack to their fans although you probably do Swillinator.

Ah yes, but more recently, 80-64 and 70-61.

$\:D/$ $\:D/$

GrizinWashington · Post by **GrizinWashington** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:14 am

And let us not forget 79-54 and 90-65 (ouch)!

Cat Grad · Post by **Cat Grad** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 10:49 am

bearBAC wrote:65-36-1
and heading for our 14th playoff in a ROW

Will the kittys always lose

4 or more? games a year?

or, do you only play one game a year
that matters to the average kitty fan?

are you just another average kitty fan?

Hey bubblehead! How many did the Fizzlies lose last year? How many have they lost in a row? Do you think you're actually going to be 1-1 going into your bye week again this year? Oh! We all know there'll be another "miracle" finish against the Coyotes

catamaran · Post by **catamaran** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 11:27 am

bearBAC wrote: Who's manboob coach was promising his fans a run DEEP into the playoffs!

At least "manboobs" as you call him can lose weight. Booby Huck will always look like Beavis

GrizinWashington · Post by **GrizinWashington** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:06 pm

catamaran wrote:
bearBAC wrote: Who's manboob coach was promising his fans a run DEEP into the playoffs!
At least "manboobs" as you call him can lose weight. Booby Huck will always look like Beavis

Bevis is gonna look awefully good holding that NC trophy aloft on ESPN. Not normally his network, I recognize, but he'll still look pretty sweet.

catamaran · Post by **catamaran** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:44 pm

GrizinWashington wrote:
catamaran wrote:
bearBAC wrote: Who's manboob coach was promising his fans a run DEEP into the playoffs!
At least "manboobs" as you call him can lose weight. Booby Huck will always look like Beavis
Bevis is gonna look awefully good holding that NC trophy aloft on ESPN. Not normally his network, I recognize, but he'll still look pretty sweet.

Like I said. The closest the Friz get to Chattanooga this season is on a tour bus on the way to Dollywood

tetoncat · Post by **tetoncat** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:07 pm

And once again the FRIZ ended the season on a two game losing streak. Any other team in the country with the questions they had last year would have been rated in the low teens, and by squeaking out wins at home would not have moved up. Then losing late in the year, when teams should be at their best would have fallen and not made the playoffs.

Once again this year you are rated high and get the early nod in the Big Sky. It was easy to talk smack when you had the streak. now you need to resort to issues other than if you beat us on the playing field. Get a grip. Head to head gets the bragging rights for the following year. YOU can talk about your playoff games if you must but don't confuse that with the fact that for 3 out of the last 4 years the Cats have been better than you.

GrizinWashington · Post by **GrizinWashington** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:25 pm

I guess Griz fans just think bigger than the Griz-cat game. I certainly don't agree that the outcome of that game determines who is "better". I'll argue the cats were better at the end of last year (and the Griz better during the middle part of the season). But if the cats go 1-10 with their one victory over the Griz, and the Griz go on a run deep into the playoffs, you'll have a hard time convincing anyone not wearing blue and gold that the cats were the better team.

Or vice versa for that matter.

catamaran · Post by **catamaran** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:32 pm

Luckily that hasn't happened for a long time

GrizinWashington · Post by **GrizinWashington** » Thu Jun 29, 2006 3:13 pm

catamaran wrote:Luckily that hasn't happened for a long time

You're right. The vice versa hasn't happened in a VERRRRRRYYYYYY long time.

Swilly3224 · Post by **Swilly3224** » Sun Jul 02, 2006 4:27 pm

Cats suck and will be lucky to win 6 games this season.

I dont even want to talk about basketball