Housewright to Akron

[Hi-Line Bobcat]

https://406mtsports.com/college/big-sky ... c9a69.html

Story states: "...ultimately found guilty of..." in regards to House being charged with a DUI. When was that official?

I wouldn’t put money on it even being resolved, but I don’t know. I just read a story about how true journalism is dead and it has turned into who can break news first regardless of if it has been verified. The jest of the article stated how social media is the driver, so more clicks is the bar now, not true journalism. I believe that’s true, but I’m not a journalist or a social media user other than on here.

[RickRund]

https://406mtsports.com/college/big-sky ... c9a69.html

Story states: "...ultimately found guilty of..." in regards to House being charged with a DUI. When was that official?

I wouldn’t put money on it even being resolved, but I don’t know. I just read a story about how true journalism is dead and it has turned into who can break news first regardless of if it has been verified. The jest of the article stated how social media is the driver, so more clicks is the bar now, not true journalism. I believe that’s true, but I’m not a journalist or a social media user other than on here.

And with the media involved, you used the correct word. JEST...

[nanacat]

https://406mtsports.com/college/big-sky ... c9a69.html

Story states: "...ultimately found guilty of..." in regards to House being charged with a DUI. When was that official?

I wouldn’t put money on it even being resolved, but I don’t know. I just read a story about how true journalism is dead and it has turned into who can break news first regardless of if it has been verified. The jest of the article stated how social media is the driver, so more clicks is the bar now, not true journalism. I believe that’s true, but I’m not a journalist or a social media user other than on here.

The way it was written makes it sound factual. Perhaps because he left the program before the verdict nothing was made public?

[Hawks86]

There is no need to blame the media or go down a rabbit hole to figure this one out.

[TomCat88]

https://406mtsports.com/college/big-sky ... c9a69.html

Story states: "...ultimately found guilty of..." in regards to House being charged with a DUI. When was that official?

I wouldn’t put money on it even being resolved, but I don’t know. I just read a story about how true journalism is dead and it has turned into who can break news first regardless of if it has been verified. The jest of the article stated how social media is the driver, so more clicks is the bar now, not true journalism. I believe that’s true, but I’m not a journalist or a social media user other than on here.

Victor Flores wrote the article and I believe that his email address is attached to the article. If not, it’s probably easy to find. You could email him and ask him how he knows or call the courts. (If you click on his byline it will take you to his email).

I know Victor from working MSU football games. He certainly doesn’t strike me as someone who would make up something for clicks.

[Hawks86]

[Bobcat4Ever]

It is significant news because it says there has been a disposition, and that disposition is not “not guilty.” Now we know.

[Justwinbaby]

It is significant news because it says there has been a disposition, and that disposition is not “not guilty.” Now we know.

There was never a time when we didn't know...

[AFCAT]

It is significant news because it says there has been a disposition, and that disposition is not “not guilty.” Now we know.

There was never a time when we didn't know...

Except for that whole innocent before proven guilty thing.

[coloradocat]

It is significant news because it says there has been a disposition, and that disposition is not “not guilty.” Now we know.

There was never a time when we didn't know...

Except for that whole innocent before proven guilty thing.

This doesn't have anything to do with this particular case but having recently served on a jury I can share that this concept is applied about as well in the jury room as it is on the internet.

[AFCAT]

It is significant news because it says there has been a disposition, and that disposition is not “not guilty.” Now we know.

There was never a time when we didn't know...

Except for that whole innocent before proven guilty thing.

This doesn't have anything to do with this particular case but having recently served on a jury I can share that this concept is applied about as well in the jury room as it is on the internet.

Well, that's a bit scary.

[MSU01]

It is significant news because it says there has been a disposition, and that disposition is not “not guilty.” Now we know.

There was never a time when we didn't know...

Except for that whole innocent before proven guilty thing.

This doesn't have anything to do with this particular case but having recently served on a jury I can share that this concept is applied about as well in the jury room as it is on the internet.

Well, that's a bit scary.

Very scary. I once served as the foreman on a jury and had one juror who kept bringing up the defendant's constitutionally protected choice not to testify in his own defense as a reason why she thought he was guilty.

[BelligerentBobcat]

It is significant news because it says there has been a disposition, and that disposition is not “not guilty.” Now we know.

There was never a time when we didn't know...

Except for that whole innocent before proven guilty thing.

This doesn't have anything to do with this particular case but having recently served on a jury I can share that this concept is applied about as well in the jury room as it is on the internet.

Well, that's a bit scary.

Very scary. I once served as the foreman on a jury and had one juror who kept bringing up the defendant's constitutionally protected choice not to testify in his own defense as a reason why she thought he was guilty.

It’s a jury of our peers, and our peers are dumb as ******.

[coloradocat]

It is significant news because it says there has been a disposition, and that disposition is not “not guilty.” Now we know.

There was never a time when we didn't know...

Except for that whole innocent before proven guilty thing.

This doesn't have anything to do with this particular case but having recently served on a jury I can share that this concept is applied about as well in the jury room as it is on the internet.

Well, that's a bit scary.

Very scary. I once served as the foreman on a jury and had one juror who kept bringing up the defendant's constitutionally protected choice not to testify in his own defense as a reason why she thought he was guilty.

That exact thing happened in my jury room (I was also the foreman). They also thought she was guilty because her lawyers weren't any good, which of course was the case because they were either PDs or the cheapest ones out there.

The Law and Order universe and most of the non-comedy programming on CBS have a direct influence on how many people are in jail.

[Hawks86]